53187 and 53190 International Business in Practice Assignment Sample 2024
Introduction
The aim of this report is to develop concepts regarding the “Hofstede Cultural Dimensions Model” with respect to cross-cultural interaction. This report has critically examined the different kinds of cultural identities as well as established the way to influence the entire management practice by this significant model.
Due to comparing six dimensions mentioned by Hofstede, it becomes helpful to forecast the UK and Colombia here can identify the remarkable difference as well as potential issues. This report is going to deliver a few positive recommendations to mitigate all these potential issues.
Section 1
Analyze the Hofstede Cultural Dimensions Model
Hofstede defines culture as a collective kind of programme in respect to the stable mind that can distinguish influential members of one category or one group of people from others. Based on the concept of theory by Hofstede, the cultural dimensions are highly important as the international business is effectively concerned with the cultural dimensions forming the important facet.
As argued by Zerfass and Viertmann (2017), a remarkable framework can usually be used for analyzing the cultural differences across the countries. The process of acknowledging this model can help to discern the several ways to promote the business is usually done in different countries worldwide.
The practical theory in respect to the cross-cultural interaction is eventually identified that the presences of six different dimensions critically help to determine several steps of business approach. As suggested by Xie (2020), individualism-collectivism acts as the most significant dimension that can help to separate the business cultures.
It can help to define effective knowledge in respect to the manner in which several business features are alternatively viewed in the suspect of various cultures.
Way of using this effective theory for preparing both two seniors to stay in Bogota
The cultural dimensions theory can help to make a significant conceptual approach to stay the production director and MD at Bogota. Hofstede developed primarily this effective cultural model based on the significant difference in beliefs and values in respect to mitigating the work-related business goal.
As opioid by Dihl et al. (2017), the concept of this model has a critical impact on the valuable business practices in the generation of negotiation, transparent communications as well as design making. Based on the case background, there have formed several kinds of complications with Brussels, which is potentially impacting the supplier network.
More extended reliance on the recommended suppliers has faced several complications to smoothly progress the entire leather footwear business operation. As opposed by Nagy and Konyha (2018), analyzing the concept of this cultural interaction business model can help to gather effective business knowledge to promote a new fact.
It can help to apply for taking information regarding the systematic and proper planning as well as determine the process to consume the time management skills.
Section 2
Comparison of the UK and Colombia regarding six dimensions
Indulgence or restraint, Masculinity, Individualism, Long term orientation, Uncertainty Avoidance index and Power distance index are marked as the remarkable six effective dimensions of this theory. Based on the analyzing skill of this knowledgeable theory can define the people who have worked for IBM across nearly 50 different countries, along with the UK, Colombia and Bogota.
In order to the earlier stage of promising this theory, Hofstede proposed four dimensions that can help to distinguish one business culture from another one (Andrijauskienė and Dumčiuvienė, 2017).
Power-Distance Index (PDI)
The above-mentioned dimension of the cultural model by Hofstede helps to manage the real fact that can suggest each person in the echo societies is not exactly equal. As mentioned by Marina (2019), this effective dimension can be represented as the possible standard attitude. The leather business-oriented organizations andsupplier within the country are moderately accepted and expect the ultimate power. This process is organizing as well as distributing the state unequally.
Based on the concept of this remarkable model insight of cultural interaction by Hofstede, it can be argued that Colombia is scoring high at near about 67 based on the standard scale of PDI. As suggested by Alapo (2019), it defines inequality is highly accepted in each layer of the society.
The respected leaders of the lather footwear business and the highest positions in the government of Colombia have a lot of influencing power. Besides that, most of the business organizations positively accept this case of power. Based on other countries such as the UK, concept of this theory at 36Britain gets the remarkably low score on the PDI.
Uncertainty Avoidance Index (UAI)
The uncertainty avoidance has to do with the specific way that it deals with society, accepting the real fact that reveals the future cannot be presumed. According to Marina (2019), the comparison status of Colombia and the UK, it can be said that Colombia gets a high score at 80 on the uncertainty avoidance.
It is marked as a remarkable nation through seeking several mechanisms to avoid the concern of ambiguity. Besides that, here also state that only emotions can be openly expressed as well as there are extensive rules for anything.
Individualism (IDV)
The individualism dimension is marked as the standard degree in respect to interdependence the society has maintained among its several members in the business. It can specialize to beware of those persons at the time of exchanging the business context for loyalty (Miller et al. 2018).
The significant comparison between Colombia and the UK states that Colombia scored near about 13. It is marked as one of the lower Individualist scores that mean Colombia is the most collectivistic culture among the entire globe. According to Miller et al. (2018), this remarkable score for Colombians mostly belongs to the lower group as well as agree with the same opinion of the group, as it is highly important.
According to the individualism dimension of the UK, this country gets the highest score such as 89 as it is belonging from the highest individualism scores. Besides this significant score value, British are the most private and Individualist people among the entire globe (Dihl et al. 2017).
Masculinity (MAS)
The high masculine score on this specific dimension is highly indicated to the society for going to be smoothly driven by success, accomplishment as well as competition. As suggested by Hermoza et al. (2018), the low feminine score shows the ultimate dominant values in the global society that are carried in respect to the others and maintain a standard quality of life. .
Based on the comparison of the two respected countries such as Colombia and the UK, it can reveal that Colombia is targeted to the score of 64 in respect to the Masculine society. Besides that, British is a kind of Masculine society at this county has score at 66 on the PDI scale. The majority of the UK population lived to work as well as standardise themselves indulging by the help of self-performance ambition.
Long-term Orientation (LTO)
The specific dimension positively describes the way each society has to follow few links with its own past due to deal with the several challenges in respect to both present and future. Consequent society in respect to both Colombia and the UK priorities the two existential objectives differently combined with each other (Chang et al. 2017).
The comparison between Colombia and the UK is suspect that Colombia is alternatively at 13 score as it marks the low score. The Colombian culture is highly classified as the state of normative. Most of the Colombian people think about the effective truth.
Indulgence/restraint (IND)
Indulgence acts as the extent to that people who are eagerly trying to control their ultimate impulse as well as desires. According to the concept of Hofstede insights that paternally weak kind of control is called the term of indulgence and relatively strong control refers to the state of restraint. Most of the UK population usually want to acknowledge the desires and impulses.
It can help to enjoy the entire life as well as give a chance to have fun, those persons have stated the positive attitude, and they are optimizing this (Yegyan, 2019). In order to the UK population think that leisure time is effectively important as well as to spend money per wish.
Section 3
Differences and Potential issues
The global economy is globalized and centralized most of the companies, especially the leather footwear business company. As mentioned by Kristjánsdóttir (2017), all the respective business cultural dimensions additionally represent the independent kind of preferences each for the one affairs state. Therefore, it can count as the serious suspect of challenge to overcome by the current complex business context (Kąkol et al. 2018).
- Integration across multicultural teams as it can be a little bit different due to face of the prejudice or the negative aspect of the cultural stereotypes in Colombia and the UK. Negative kinds of cultural stereotypes are acted to be seriously detrimental to the company morale and its impact on productivity (Vollero et al. 2020).
- Professional communication is to be misinterpreted as well as difficult for acknowledging across the culture and languages. Due to several countries, comprehending the accents range as well as examining the native speaker’s use in terms of idioms creates numerous difficulties (Andrijauskiene and Dumčiuvienė, 2017).
- Conflict kind of working style across the multicultural team acts as little bit difficult as it reflects the cultural values with compounding several differences (Huang and Crotts, 2019).
The major weakness of the model of Hofstede in respect to the cultural dimension is associated with the inconclusive aspect of research. This possible weakness can be determined due to comparing the six significant dimensions originated from the country of Colombia and the UK (Nagy and Konyha, 2018).
Collectivism versus individualism, low power distance versus high power distance, low uncertainty avoidance versus high uncertainty avoidance critically marks as complex consequences. As suggested by PuchetaMartínez et al. (2021), this respected model is usually based on the concept of answer in respect to the one selective company. It makes the collected sample size biased and small through creating low accuracy and validity.
Recommendations
Several ways have been presented as these are suggested for coping up with the discussing issues that are faced by the cross-cultural teams of leather footwear business companies in the UK.
- Respect and acknowledge the cultural differences
- Built trust and rapport can solve the conflict issue
- Transparent communication process can help to mitigate all the remarkable misunderstanding (Dingil et al. 2019)
- Establish the standard norms for the multicultural team
- Overcome the cultural and language barriers that can help to consider the various kind of cultural communication styles (Alapo, 2019)
- Take some mitigating action to avoid the stage of stereotypes
- Organize several training based on the cross-culture
- Appoint a clearly ideal, designated manager or the leader to lead the entire leather footwear business in different country, worldwide (de Mooij, 2017)
- Promote the open workable environment based on the internal communication site
Conclusion
The entire report concludes about the usual concept of “Hofstede Cultural Dimensions Model” and this remarkable theory can help to examine the process of cross-cultural interaction. Various cultural identities as well as its specific way can highly influence the practice of higher management post of leather footwear business.
This present report standard facilitates the six different dimensional approaches and delivers a comparison between Colombia and the UK. A specific option based on this cultural dimensions theory is delivered through this report as it can be used for preparing the two high post managers to stay in Bogota.
This report stabilizes the state of major differences that can be identified during comparison. The majority of the potential issues are classified in this above section as well as deliver some recommended options to mitigate those issues.
Reference list
Alamo, O., 2019. National Culture and Influences on Leadership Practices [Power Distance Index–PDI]. Available at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1308&context=yc_pubs
Andrijauskienė, M. and Dumčiuvienė, D., 2017, October. Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and national innovation level. In DIEM: Dubrovnik International Economic Meeting (Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 189-205). Sveučilište u Dubrovniku. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/276270
Beugelsdijk, S. and Welzel, C., 2018. Dimensions and dynamics of national culture: Synthesizing Hofstede with Inglehart. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(10), pp.1469-1505. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0022022118798505
Chang, T.H., Tucker, A.R., Norton, C.L., Gass, M.A. and Jaworski, S.E., 2017. Cultural issues in adventure programming: Applying Hofstede’s five dimensions to assessment and practice. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 17(4), pp.307-320. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michael_Gass/publication/311274302_Cultural_issues_in_adventure_programming_Applying_Hofstede’s_five_dimensions_to_assessment_and_practice/links/5b689f41299bf14c6d94f433/Cultural-issues-in-adventure-programming-Applying-Hofstede’s-five-dimensions-to-assessment-and-practice.pdf
de Mooij, M., 2017. Comparing dimensions of national culture for secondary analysis of consumer behavior data of different countries. International Marketing Review. Available at: http://www.mariekedemooij.com/articles/demooij_2017_int_marketing_review.pdf
Dihl, L., Testa, E.S., Knob, P., da Silva, G.L., Favaretto, R.M., de Alcântara, M.F. and Musse, S.R., 2017, March. Generating cultural characters based on Hofstede dimensions. In 2017 IEEE Virtual Humans and Crowds for Immersive Environments (VHCIE) (pp. 1-5). IEEE. Available at: https://repositorio.pucrs.br/dspace/bitstream/10923/14143/2/Generating_Cultural_Characters_based_on_Hofstede_Dimensions.pdf
Dingil, A.E., Rupi, F., Schweizer, J., Stasiskiene, Z. and Aalipour, K., 2019. The role of culture in urban travel patterns: Quantitative analyses of urban areas based on Hofstede’s culture dimensions. Social sciences, 8(8), p.227. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/8/8/227/pdf
Hermoza, S.A., Kosuri, R., Hattox, N., McCluskey, K., Nasser, A., Tran, K.K., Elesawi, M., Zuberi, A., Lewis, C.D. and Kraman, S., 2018. HOFSTEDE & ETHICS IN COLOMBIA & THE USA. Copyright 2018 by Institute for Global Business Research, Nashville, TN, USA, p.213. Available at: https://www.igbr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/2018-October-Conference-Proceedings.pdf#page=214
Huang, S.S. and Crotts, J., 2019. Relationships between Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and tourist satisfaction: A cross-country cross-sample examination. Tourism Management, 72, pp.232-241. Available at: https://123project.ir/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Relationships-between-Hofstedes-cultural-dimensions-and-tourist-satisfaction-A-cross-country-cross-sample-examination.pdf
Kąkol, U., Kisilowski, M., Kunikowski, G. and Uklańska, A., 2018. ADAPTATION OF CIVIL PLANNING AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT PRACTICES BASED ON HOFSTEDE’S CULTURAL DIMENSIONS MODEL. Management Research & Practice, 10. Available at: http://www.mrp.ase.ro/no104/f5.pdf
Kristjánsdóttir, H., Guðlaugsson, Þ.Ö., Guðmundsdóttir, S. and Aðalsteinsson, G.D., 2017. Hofstede national culture and international trade. Applied Economics, 49(57), pp.5792-5801. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/download/62052173/2017_Kristjansdottir_et-al-Applied-Economics20200210-85121-11555t0.pdf
Marina, A.G., 2019. ACCOUNTING AND CULTURAL DIMENSIONS IN EUROPE AND CIS COUNTRIES REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF IFRS FOR SMEs. Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 21(2), pp.22-31. Available at: http://oeconomica.uab.ro/upload/lucrari/2120192/02.pdf
Miller, J., Snyder, G., Antoniou, D., Bitar, E., Garrett, C., Alcocer-Loredo, F., Qutub, A. and Norman, G., 2018. HOFSTEDE’S 6 DIMENSION COMPARISON OF THE UNITED KINGDOM, CHINA, COLUMBIA, CHILE, CANADA & THE UAE. Copyright 2018 by Institute for Global Business Research, Nashville, TN, USA, p.149. Available at: https://www.igbr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/2018-Internet-Conference-Proceedings.pdf#page=150
Minkov, M., 2018. A revision of Hofstede’s model of national culture: Old evidence and new data from 56 countries. Cross-Cultural & Strategic Management. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a643/672ba1189b07c6ae649119aec574fc00a582.pdf
Nagy, S. and Konyha, C., 2018. The Effects of Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions on Pro-Environmental Behaviour: How Culture Influences Environmentally Conscious Behaviour. Club of Economics in Miskolc TMP, 14(1), pp.27-36. Available at: http://real.mtak.hu/83149/1/TMP_2018_01_03.pdf
Pucheta‐Martínez, M.C., Gallego‐Álvarez, I. and Bel‐Oms, I., 2021. Cultural environments and the appointment of female directors on boards: An analysis from a global perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), pp.555-569. Available at: http://repositori.uji.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10234/191702/72201.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Vollero, A., Siano, A., Palazzo, M. and Amabile, S., 2020. Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and corporate social responsibility in online communication: Are they independent constructs?. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), pp.53-64. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/csr.1773
Xie, J., 2020, November. Discussion on the Theoretical and Practical Studies of Campus Culture. In 2020 Conference on Education, Language and Inter-cultural Communication (ELIC 2020) (pp. 87-92). Atlantis Press. Available at: https://download.atlantis-press.com/article/125946810.pdf
Yagya, N., 2018. Cultural dimensions of Armenians based on Hofstede’s theory and their subsequent implications of doing business in Armenia (Doctoral dissertation). Available at: https://dspace.aua.am/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/1553/Nshan%20Yegyan_Thesis.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Zerfass, A. and Viertmann, C., 2017. Creating business value through corporate communication: A theory-based framework and its practical application. Journal of Communication Management. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Neha_Sharma148/publication/303966690_Internalizing_Citizenship_Behaviour_through_Internal_Communication_among_Indian_Public_Services_Employees/links/5760b73608ae227f4a3f2c72.pdf#page=64
Know more about UniqueSubmission’s other writing services:
