BMG871 International Business Research Skills Assignment Sample 2023
Option 1: Qualitative Research Task
Introduction
Qualitative research task is a methodological approach using which individual information from non-numerical data sources (Sawatsky et al. 2019). This study is going to highlight the actions of interviewers and segregate their positive and negative essence from them in an appropriate manner.
- Report Segregating Mistakes
Introduction of Interviewer and Research Topic
In case of an interview and while conducting it, an interviewer has to maintain certain decorum. Hence, the approach of interview has developed based on which increased effectiveness is witnessed. An interviewer while conducting an interview has to start the session with greeting interviewee and following that by telling their name. However, in case of the subjective interview, it is witnessed that the interviewer was unable to maintain her sitting position and was quite informal (Lyu et al. 2018). It is also observed that though she introduced herself it seemed to be quite questionable while asking questions to the interviewee. According to the observation of Ivanova and Light (2018), curiosity plays a crucial factor while taking an interview. Due to this aspect, an interviewer is able to acquire knowledge from a scenario.
Speed of Speech
Speed of speech plays an important role in conducting an interview based on which quality of information depends on. Maintaining a positive speed of speech lays a positive impact on the interviewee due to which they are able to provide effective answers to questions. In general cases slower speed speech that includes pauses assists an interviewee in processing questions of an interviewer in an effective manner. As per the observation of Janse and Andringa (2021), it is opined that speed of speech directly influences the memory, knowledge, and sensitivity of interviewee. In a contradiction, while conducting research in this subjective approach, it is witnessed that the pace and speed of speech of the interviewer was not up to the mark (Charoenruk and Olson, 2018). It is witnessed that while taking the interview, the interviewer showed a quiet impulsive attitude and the constructed sentences were not short. Owing to this aspect, it can be stated that due to this aspect it might not provide her with effective information regarding her targeted subject.
Behaviour of Interviewer
General Behaviour
In an overall aspect, it can be opined that the interviewer was very casual while taking the interview and based on which the quality got disrupted. In addition, in case of body language, the interviewer while asking questions did not establish any kind of eye contact. In addition it is also witnessed that she while conducting this process was moving her hands much more while elaborating a question. Hence, it can be stated that this attitude was highly unprofessional.
Body Language
It can be stated that as the interviewer was not making an effective eye contact and was very much informal while taking the interview, she was unable to establish an affinity with her subject affecting quality of interviewer.
Approach of Developing Rapport
After asking questions, it is witnessed that she was not providing her interviewee efficient time to respond to her questions and hence it is seen that the interviewee was getting confused. Hence, it was affecting the quality of her provided answers in an effective manner.
Listening Skill
As while commencing the interview, this interviewer was not paying attention as she has being engaged in making use of her external devices.
Respectfulness
Hence, it can be marked as a faulty process due to which the researcher was unable to maintain her stand in an effective manner.
Questioning Pattern of Interviewer
Objectively Asked Questions
During the session, it is witnessed that the interviewer was leading her interviewee based that can be remarked as a very much negative approach for an interviewer. Moreover, apart from asking subjective questions, this interviewer often was asking irrelevant questions to the interviewee. Hence, it was creating discomfort for her due to which quality of her provided answers was getting affected.
Question Leading Approach
While conducting this informative interview it was also witnessed that the interviewer was leading her interviewee and owing to which she was also criticizing the answers provided by the interviewee.
Appropriateness Interview Concluding Process
No, the way the interviewer ended the interview was not appropriate owing to which quality of the interview was hampered. In case of a subjective interview, the interviewer by stating a thanking note should end a session. However, in case of this interview process, it is observed that the interviewer even after thanking the interviewee was quite confused and asked her about if she is intending to answer some more areas or not. This gesture is very much inappropriate and was not up to the mark.
b. Report Outlining Positive Points
Introduction of Research Topic and Interviewer
In case of qualitative training evaluation interview, it is observed that the interviewer while addressing the interviewee was very generous. In addition, it is also witnessed that before starting, the interview stated the detailed concern of the purpose of this interview and after that, she started asking questions. In addition, it is also witnessed that she also swung her kind gestures and selective words developed a comfortable atmosphere by asking name of the interviewee (Banco and Kobakova, 2018). According to the observation of Hilton (2017), it is observed that owing to the approach of interview quality and structure is maintained based on which the interviewee is able to acquire depth while answering the concerned questions.
Speed of Speech
Throughout the whole interview process, it has witnessed that the interviewer was quite patient and was asking questions by taking time. In case of her speed of speech, this interviewer was concerned about. She has framed her questions in small divisions due to which the speed of her speech was quite decent and providing efficient reaction time towards the interviewee. In the qualitative session, it has also witnessed that after asking the questions she also politely was describing the agenda of the objectives of the questions so that can provide assistance towards the interviewee. According to the observation of O’Neil et al. (2021), it is witnessed that decently asked questions itself depicts the intention or objectives behind them. Hence, in case of this interview session it is witnessed that by reducing the tempo of addressed questions she was able to clarify the intention towards the interviewee and was able to acquire qualitative answers.
Approach of Interviewer
General Behaviour
Throughout the interview session, it has witnessed that the interviewer maintained a very generous behaviour owing to which she was able to conduct this interview process. In addition, it is also witnessed that this researcher was while asking questions towards the interviewee as also taking and providing time of response. Hence, interviewing quality and integrity has maintained in an effective manner.
Body Language
The interviewer was sighted in a calm and composed manner and effectively was maintaining a positive eye contact with the interviewee. Hence, she was able to acquire positive feedback from her.
Approaches for Rapport
The interviewer before jumping into the context first focused on the process of establishing a positive relationship with the interviewee. Asking name and introducing her to the interviewee she established a positive and progressive atmosphere based on which she was able to develop a positive rapport.
Listening Skills
In case of this interview session, it has observed that as the interviewer was calm and composed she was totally providing space to the interviewee and was listening to every aspect of her words in a positive manner.
Respectfulness
After evaluating the overall aspect, it can be stated that the interviewer was genuinely respectful throughout her process and was respecting every word provided by the interviewee.
Questioning Pattern of Interviewer
Interviewers Objective Linking
The interviewer throughout the interview process was up to the mark and while asking questions was straightforward. She while asking questions to the interviewee was much attentive and focused towards maintaining her grounds. However, it has also witnessed that she also has asked some questions that were directly not linked with objectives but at the same time were very much subjective. Hence, it can be stated that the interviewer was very attentive based on which from the middle of the process she was able to detect additional questions.
Question Leading
In case of leading interviewee, this interviewer was patient with her and not leading her or her thoughts. Hence, it can be stated that this interview process was much progressive and evaluative while conducting.
Appropriateness of Interview Conclusion Process
Concluding an interview is important based on which a complete evaluation can be conducted in an effective manner. In case of this interview process, it has observed that the interviewer thanked her interviewee and asked her for feedback about the process and programme. Hence, it can be stated that owing to this process, both the interviewee and interviewer were able to express their concerns regarding the situation and at the same time the interviewer was able to acquire qualitative data regarding.
c. Detailed Evaluation of Participants Observation
Participants Observation
Participant’s observation can be elaborated as a methodological approach that foregrounds the daily activities of participants in an effective manner. In other words it can also be stated that because of participants’ observation process, researchers by being a part of participants’ daily life observes their legitimate conditions (Kirikçilar and Yildiz, 2018). The advantage of this aspect is that due to participant’s observation a researcher cannot affect behaviour of groups. Hence, conducted activities are developed and maintained in a flaw full manner. Furthermore, because of this aspect a researcher is also able to acquire detailed information about groups. In contrast to these advantages, it is also witnessed that there are some limitations of this methodological approach. Owing to this scenario, developing openness with a group has disrupted in a negative manner and hence researchers have to obtain information just by witnessing an event.
Overt and Covert Participant Observation
As per the observation of Roulet et al. (2017), overt participant observation using which an individual researcher by becoming a part of a group is able to conduct a research process. Obtaining an understanding from this ground it can be stated that making use of overt observation method researchers by developing an interconnectivity platform interacts and blends in with a group. Implementation of this method is loud and while making use of this approach, researchers let the society know about the research process. In a contradiction to overt observation, process Roulet et al. (2017) has stated that covert observation process is more of a secret approach. Obtaining information, it is witnessed that making use of this process as a researcher without letting a society know secretly carries out their process of research in an effective manner.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Overt and Covert Observation
Making use of overt observation methods it assists an analyst in developing a positive relationship with participants while acquiring effective answers. In order to do so, researchers here before starting any kind of initiation establishes honesty with the participants while operating. In contradiction to these areas Cillessen and Marks (2017) has stated that this method of gathering information is aggressive. It has witnessed that for gathering information researchers’ swipe through vast amounts of data. In addition, this process is time consuming and affects research quality.
However, in case of covert observation process it is confidential and owing to these aspect researchers without disturbing participants gathers quality data. It can also be stated that these data are very much valuable and valedictory while operating. On the contrary, it can be stated that acquiring effective information through this method is much more difficult, affecting researchers’ processes in a negative manner.
Examples for Using Participant Observation Method
It can be stated that a very common example of this method is researchers being engaged with their respondents. Due to this process, researchers are able to gather qualitative data and can synchronize them effectively with their research process. Hence, researchers are able to acquire effective results and answers of their raised questions.
Conclusion
It can be concluded that international business research skill is very important while conducting a detailed research process. In case of this scenario of a qualitative research task, it focuses on the interview process and the positive and negative aspects within. Evaluating a video presentation, it has observed that there were certain problems due to which often interviewers are able to attain effective information from interviewees in an effective manner. However, making use of this study an individual can improve skills and bring in development while undergoing the process.
References
Cillessen, A.H. and Marks, P.E., (2017). Methodological choices in peer nomination research. New directions for child and adolescent development, 2017(157), pp.21-44.
Hilton, C.E., (2017). The importance of pretesting questionnaires: a field research example of cognitive pretesting the Exercise referral Quality of Life Scale (ER-QLS). International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(1), pp.21-34.
Ivanova, P. and Light, D., (2018). ‘It’s not that we like death or anything’: Exploring the motivations and experiences of visitors to a lighter dark tourism attraction. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 13(4), pp.356-369.
Janse, E. and Andringa, S.J., (2021). The roles of cognitive abilities and hearing acuity in older adults’ recognition of words taken from fast and spectrally reduced speech. Applied Psycholinguistics, 42(3), pp.763-790.
O’Neil, M., Muselli, L., Raissi, M. and Zacchiroli, S., (2021). ‘Open source has won and lost the war’: Legitimising commercial–communal hybridisation in a FOSS project. New Media & Society, 23(5), pp.1157-1180.
Roulet, T.J., Gill, M.J., Stenger, S. and Gill, D.J., (2017). Reconsidering the value of covert research: The role of ambiguous consent in participant observation. Organizational Research Methods, 20(3), pp.487-517.
Sawatsky, A.P., Ratelle, J.T. and Beckman, T.J., (2019). Qualitative research methods in medical education. Anesthesiology, 131(1), pp.14-22.
Lyu, J., Mao, Z. and Hu, L., (2018). Cruise experience and its contribution to subjective well‐being: A case of Chinese tourists. International Journal of Tourism Research, 20(2), pp.225-235.
Charoenruk, N. and Olson, K., (2018). Do Listeners Perceive Interviewers’ Attributes from their Voices and Do Perceptions Differ by Question Type?. Field Methods, 30(4), pp.312-328.
Kirikçilar, R.G. and Yildiz, A., (2018). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Craft: Utilization of the TPACK When Designing the GeoGebra Activities. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 11(1), pp.101-116.
Banco, M. and Kobakova, D., (2018). Turning a commodity into an experience: the “sweetest spot” in the coffee shop. Innovative Marketing, 14(4), pp.46-55.
Know more about UniqueSubmission’s other writing services:
