A Comparative Analysis of Health and Social Care System Sample

Introduction

Over the course of the past decade, discussions pertaining to global health have increasingly concentrated on various healthcare systems. These systems include the institutions, organisations, and resources (physical, financial, and human) that have been gathered in order to provide health care services to the public in a way that satisfies their requirements. The provision of health care services that are sufficient to fulfil the requirements of the population has been the major emphasis of this effort. Because of the large amounts of foreign aid given to disease-specific programmes, particularly for drugs and medical supplies, and the relatively inadequate funding of the more general health care infrastructures in low- and middle-income countries, it has become increasingly important to place an emphasis on health care systems in these regions(Rowe,2018).

Main body

This is especially true given the fact that disease-specific programmes have received the majority of the foreign aid. This is especially true when considering the fact that the majority of financial assistance from international sources has gone toward disease-specific programmes. This is especially true when taking into consideration the significant amounts of foreign aid offered to disease-specific programmes, in particular for the procurement of pharmaceuticals and other medical supplies. Recently, the topic of establishing universal coverage for health care has been the focus of discussions among advocacy groups and other organisations based in a variety of countries and regions across the world. In the year 2012, a declaration was issued by the United Nations on the subject of universal coverage. This declaration was the subject of the proclamation.

Recent research has shown that health care systems in countries with low and medium incomes have a variety of problems that need to be rectified. These problems include the following: Because of the evidence that demonstrates how critical these issues are, they require attention immediately. In the 75 countries that account for more than 95% of maternal and child fatalities, the median percentage of births that are attended by a qualified health professional is only 62% (range: 10 to 100%). This is despite the fact that the percentage of births that are attended by a qualified health professional is higher in some of these countries. In addition, the likelihood of obtaining this treatment is substantially lower for women who do not have the resources necessary to pay for it or be covered by it, such as money or insurance. In these 75 nations, the percentage of births that are attended by a certified health professional ranges from 10 to 100 percent, although the average is just 62 percent. Only 62% of births in the 75 countries that account for more than 95% of the world’s maternal and child mortality are witnessed by a trained medical practitioner. These countries account for the vast majority of the world’s deaths. This is the percentage of births that are attended by a medical practitioner who has the appropriate training. Over one hundred million people fall below the federal poverty line each and every year as a direct and immediate result of the expenses that are connected with medical care. This is a direct and immediate consequence of the costs associated with medical care. Many more people may decide against receiving treatment completely owing to a lack of cash since they do not have sufficient financial security to cover the costs associated with receiving medical care. It’s possible that this is the situation due to the high expenditures of receiving medical treatment(Wang,2019).

In the recent past, a number of countries in UK and their development partners have developed novel approaches to paying for, organising, and providing medical treatment in an effort to overcome the sorts of structural faults described earlier in the context of the health care delivery system. This article provides a concise summary of the primary challenges confronting the health care systems in low- and middle-income countries, a rundown of the most common approaches to addressing these challenges, and a more in-depth examination of three of these approaches(Rosengren,2018). Additionally, the article provides a rundown of the most common approaches to addressing these challenges. In addition, the article provides a summary of the key difficulties that are now being faced by the health care systems in low-income nations and middle-income countries. There has been a significant amount of discussion regarding the potential solutions to these issues. This discussion has included the question of whether or not monetary incentives ought to be utilised to increase the utilisation of health care and improve the quality of health care, as well as the question of whether or not private entities ought to be employed to expand the reach of the health care system(Kruk,2019).

Throughout the course of this inquiry, we have been consulting a database called as Health Systems. evidence in addition to the rapidly expanding amount of research that focuses on the shortcomings of healthcare systems. Because the information that is now accessible is of poor quality and uneven coverage, the evidence that the problems with the health care system exist is more persuasive than the evidence that the suggested remedies for the problems with the health care system do so. In addition, the specific characteristics of the various nations have a significant impact on the assessments conducted to determine whether or not particular methodologies may be applicable, as well as the level of success achieved by those evaluations. Because of this, any generalisations that are formed from research that are done on the health systems in individual countries need to be submitted to meticulous scrutiny before they can be adopted. There is not likely to be a single best practise for how a health care system ought to be organised, nor is there likely to be a silver bullet that can solve all of the issues that come up within the system. Similarly, there is not likely to be a magic solution that can fix all of the issues that come up within the system. In addition, it is quite unlikely that a single solution will ever be developed that is capable of resolving all of the issues that crop up. It is essential to acknowledge that the process of enhancing the medical infrastructure of emerging nations is a continual endeavour. In 2001, the World Health Organization’s Commission on Macroeconomics and Health gave the go-ahead for the World Health Organization to establish a framework that would identify the constraints that are placed on health care systems. Since that time, a significant amount of attention has been paid to this idea. It is essential to acknowledge that efforts to enhance the health care systems of emerging nations are a continuing process. One of the most powerful advantages of this framework is that it can analyse systems from both a horizontal and a vertical perspective at the same time, which is one of its greatest strengths. Another one of this framework’s strengths is that it can analyse systems from both a top-down and a bottom-up perspective (e.g., accounting for the support functions of the higher levels in a system)( Kola,2019).

As a result of this, the fundamental challenge that low- and middle-income countries have in terms of their monetary systems is increasing the level of financial stability that is available to families. It is not beyond the realm of possibility for social insurance programmes to offer protection to the segment of the population that is gainfully employed in the formal economy and has taxes withheld from their wages. The term “taxpaying working population” refers to this subset of the total population. In addition, the overwhelming majority of people believe that people who make the lowest income should receive some sort of health care subsidy from general taxes, and that this is something that everyone need. This is something that the great majority of people believe. This is a must. The three most important concerns are whether or not those who are jobless or underemployed should be required to pay general taxes, whether or not contributory insurance systems should encourage people to join, and whether or not people who are extremely poor should even be covered at all.

A study that looked at 16 different pieces of systematic research concluded that incentives that target the achievement of specific, clearly stated behavioural goals associated with the provision and use of relatively fundamental services appear to have some effectiveness in the near term. This conclusion was reached as a result of the study’s analysis of the research. Incentives of this kind are typically connected to the delivery of fundamental services as well as their use. There has been a rise in the number of births that take place in hospitals as well as the number of preventative care visits made by young children as a direct result of the establishment of a performance-based payment system for primary care practitioners in Malwani. Conditional cash transfers have been linked to an increase in the use of preventive services in Latin America, and in Malwani, this has led to an increase in the number of preventive care visits among young children. In addition, this has been linked to an increase in the use of preventive services in Latin America. In addition, studies conducted in Latin America have found a correlation between the provision of conditional cash transfers and an increase in the utilisation of preventative services(Geldsetzer,2018).  Due to the limited amount of research that has been carried out on the topic, it is difficult to come to any definitive conclusions regarding the degree of success that similar programmes may or may not have in other countries. This makes it difficult to determine whether or not such programmes should be implemented. There is a possibility that governments in low-income nations might not possess the requisite people, experience, or infrastructure to appropriately supervise and monitor services, payments, and performance. This fact raises questions about the programmes’ ability to be put into effect, which raises other questions. Women who were deemed as being “less destitute” in Malwani were given a bigger portion of the maternity incentive payment than those who were seen as being really needy. This was done in order to encourage them to have children. This was done in an effort to urge them to have additional children and boost their family size. It is also uncertain whether incentives are beneficial for services that are more sophisticated, nor is it known whether the current shift will be sustained over the course of time. Both of these questions remain unanswered. At this juncture, neither of these questions can be answered with complete conviction by any means possible.

On the other hand, Hurst and Jee-Hughes (2021) highlighted some of the difficulties that come up when attempting to put this theory into practise. The fact that the framework merely assessed a variety of potential indicators that might be gathered across all dimensions rather than truly analysing the effectiveness of the health system is one of these issues. A further obstacle is that the framework only evaluated a range of potential indicators that might be gathered across all dimensions. This makes data collection more difficult. This increase in health status, which can be attributed to the operations of the health care system but not to broader variables, is of importance to the OECD framework, which is interested in evaluating this improvement. Improvements in a person’s health state that may be attributed to the activities of the health care system are referred to as health outcomes. Process measures, in which utilisation of care is believed to be related to positive outcomes, are examples of proxy indicators of outcomes. Health status measures, in which there is reason to assume that mortality or morbidity is amenable to appropriate and timely medical care, are also examples of proxy indicators of outcomes. Other examples of proxy indicators of outcomes include: The authors agree that it is difficult to separate the effects of health care from those of other factors that determine outcomes. When it comes to indicators of responsiveness, the OECD emphasises the fact that there is still a significant amount of difference between countries and international organisations in terms of the concepts that are included in the responsiveness component. This is true both in terms of the indicators themselves as well as the concepts themselves.

When the health care systems of two countries are compared, the results may have a significant impact on the decision-makers who work in the individual’s own nation as a result of the comparison. It offers the opportunity to analyse both the overall performance of the nation as a whole and the policies that govern it, as well as a means through which to enhance accountability and public engagement in decision-making processes.

The response to the World Health Report 2000 (WHR2000) provided some indication of the potential usefulness of such comparisons, but it was also noticed that there are significant methodological impediments in the way of making them practical (WHO, 2000). In this chapter, we will compare and contrast the many healthcare systems that are practised in various regions of the world in an effort to synthesise all of the knowledge that we have obtained up to this point. Comparing the healthcare systems of other countries is the primary focus of our study, and we only go deeper into international comparisons when doing so may throw light on the relative efficiency of different healthcare systems.

Insightful data on the performance of national health systems may be gleaned through worldwide performance evaluation as well as health system benchmarking. However, neither method is without its share of obstacles to overcome. There are still major data gaps in the field of health performance, in addition to limitations in the approaches that are presently being employed. This is the case despite the fact that great advancements have been made in the collecting and analysis of data.

There is a limited amount of data that is capable of being directly compared because of variations in vocabulary, codes, and cultures. This limits the quantity of data that can be compared. In summing up, the health care system is famously difficult to comprehend owing to the intrinsic complexity of the system as a whole and the variety of components that comprise it.

Whether or not volume-variable, ‘fixed,’ amortisation, or investment costs are included; whether or not available subsidies, such as those from local authorities, are explicitly stated; these are just some of the variables that can affect the final cost estimate, even for services that are otherwise identical. Whether or not volume-variable, ‘fixed,’ amortisation, or investment costs are included; whether or not volume-variable, ‘fixed,’ or investment costs are included; whether or How overheads are handled, whether or not volume-variable, ‘fixed,’ amortisation, or investment costs are included; how overheads are handled, whether or not volume-variable, ‘fixed,’ or investment costs are included; whether or not volume-variable, ‘fixed,’ or investment costs are included. The practises of accounting may be separated into a great many subcategories, and each of these subcategories has its own standards that are obligatory to follow. In conclusion, the vast international differences in the cost of inputs, most notably the remuneration of labour (for example, the time that doctors and nurses spend on their work), are responsible for a significant portion of the observed range in European prices. This is especially the case when it comes to the cost of healthcare services. The objective of the investigation is to discover a mechanism to make all of these data freely accessible in order to investigate the underlying issues that are the basis for the discrepancies in service and cost. In spite of the fact that it was not a part of this particular research, the overriding purpose is to identify whether or not different inputs and methods lead to different outcomes.

As a consequence of this, deciding what the individual who is the focus of the investigation is liable for is one of the most important judgments that must be made. For instance, a health care system needs to address the preexisting epidemiological trends and potentially harmful practises that have already been established over a relatively short period of time. These must be addressed because they have already been established. Adjustment for risk is a component that is incredibly crucial to take into consideration when making comparisons between various healthcare systems.

It is reasonable to hold the health care system accountable for having an influence on positive changes in both epidemiological trends and individual behaviours that promote health over the course of a long period of time. As a consequence of this, the significance of risk adjustment is diminished as a significant number of the factors contributing to the outcomes that are the focus of the current research ought to be held accountable by the health care system.

It is possible to see a considerable role for the private sector, in particular with regard to the provision of services, within the health care systems in countries with low and moderate incomes. The private sector is home to a diverse range of service providers, including pharmacies, mobile clinics, and permanent medical institutions like clinics and hospitals. In addition, the private sector is home to a number of different mobile clinics. Both an increase in the amount of discretionary spending and a widespread dissatisfaction with the level of service offered by the state have contributed to an increase in the number of private providers. In addition, an increase in the amount of discretionary spending has contributed to an increase in the amount of discretionary spending. A pragmatic argument has been made that, given the availability of these commercial providers, those providers ought to be used to remedy the physical inaccessibility of services, the lack of personnel, and the improper distribution of that personnel, in addition to the inadequate stockpiles of pharmaceuticals and supplies. Another pragmatic argument has been made that these providers ought to be used to remedy the lack of personnel and the improper distribution of that personnel(Haldane,2017). This argument is predicated on the notion that the most effective approach to handle these difficulties is to do so through the utilisation of commercial providers, and that this notion serves as the argument’s foundation.

On the basis of the evidence that has been presented up until this point, there are very few judgments that can be made with absolute certainty about the most effective strategies to improve the existing national health care systems. This is due to the fact that there is a significant amount of potential for advancement. What works well in one country might not work well in another, and not all methods are acceptable to all governments or their many constituents within each nation’s multiple political systems(Chowdhury,2020). This is because each country has its own unique political system. This is due to the fact that every nation has its very own distinct political system. There is no one solution that can be integrated into the existing healthcare system that will immediately result in increased levels of both efficiency and effectiveness simultaneously. This is because there is no single response that can simultaneously improve both. This is due to the fact that there is no one answer that can be applied to the problem. Given the complexity of healthcare systems as social systems and the necessity of cultural compatibility for the development of successful medicines, the fact that this is the case should not come as a surprise to anybody(Ferronato,2019).

Certain characteristics of effective health care systems were uncovered in the course of a recent historical investigation on the contribution that the health care system has made to better health in five different countries. The following characteristics fall under this category: These networks steadily improved their capacity to select the strategies that turned out to be the most successful and to incorporate into their deliberations both the results of their own testing and the lessons learned from the work done in other countries. In addition, their ability to choose the strategies that turned out to be the most successful steadily improved. It is just as important to cultivate an environment that is innovative in order to construct a health care system as it is to put particular strategies into effect, such as those that have been detailed in the paragraphs that came before this one. In other words, the two things are equally as important. In other words, the two activities absolutely have to be done together.

Conclusion

As a consequence of this, it is necessary to consider the process of bettering medical treatment to be an ongoing one. This process must be recognised as one that requires the incorporation of complex systems and asks for continual work across a wide variety of fronts. In addition, this process must be completed in a timely manner. The international community may be able to lend a helping hand by providing support to reform efforts that are being led by specific states and by building a more robust body of evidence that assists in the sharing of best practises amongst countries. Both of these could be considered ways in which the international community could lend a helping hand. Both of these may be construed as potential avenues via which the global community might be able to provide a helping hand.

References

Chowdhury, R., Heng, K., Shawon, M. S. R., Goh, G., Okonofua, D., Ochoa-Rosales, C., … & Franco, O. H. (2020). Dynamic interventions to control COVID-19 pandemic: a multivariate prediction modelling study comparing 16 worldwide countries. European journal of epidemiology, 35(5), 389-399. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10654-020-00649-w

Ferronato, N., Rada, E. C., Portillo, M. A. G., Cioca, L. I., Ragazzi, M., & Torretta, V. (2019). Introduction of the circular economy within developing regions: A comparative analysis of advantages and opportunities for waste valorization. Journal of environmental management, 230, 366-378. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479718311058

Geldsetzer, P., Manne-Goehler, J., Marcus, M. E., Ebert, C., Zhumadilov, Z., Wesseh, C. S., … & Jaacks, L. M. (2019). The state of hypertension care in 44 low-income and middle-income countries: a cross-sectional study of nationally representative individual-level data from 1· 1 million adults. The Lancet, 394(10199), 652-662. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673619309559

Haldane, V., De Foo, C., Abdalla, S. M., Jung, A. S., Tan, M., Wu, S., … & Legido-Quigley, H. (2021). Health systems resilience in managing the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from 28 countries. Nature Medicine, 27(6), 964-980. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01381-y

Kola, L., Kohrt, B. A., Hanlon, C., Naslund, J. A., Sikander, S., Balaji, M., … & Patel, V. (2021). COVID-19 mental health impact and responses in low-income and middle-income countries: reimagining global mental health. The Lancet Psychiatry, 8(6), 535-550. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215036621000250

Kruk, M. E., Gage, A. D., Joseph, N. T., Danaei, G., García-Saisó, S., & Salomon, J. A. (2018). Mortality due to low-quality health systems in the universal health coverage era: a systematic analysis of amenable deaths in 137 countries. The Lancet, 392(10160), 2203-2212. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673618316684

Rosengren, A., Smyth, A., Rangarajan, S., Ramasundarahettige, C., Bangdiwala, S. I., AlHabib, K. F., … & Yusuf, S. (2019). Socioeconomic status and risk of cardiovascular disease in 20 low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries: the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiologic (PURE) study. The Lancet Global Health, 7(6), e748-e760. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X19300452

Rowe, A. K., Rowe, S. Y., Peters, D. H., Holloway, K. A., Chalker, J., & Ross-Degnan, D. (2018). Effectiveness of strategies to improve health-care provider practices in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. The Lancet Global Health, 6(11), e1163-e1175. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X1830398X

Wang, C., Ghadimi, P., Lim, M. K., & Tseng, M. L. (2019). A literature review of sustainable consumption and production: A comparative analysis in developed and developing economies. Journal of cleaner production, 206, 741-754. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652618329019

Know more about UniqueSubmission’s other writing services:

Assignment Writing Help

Essay Writing Help

Dissertation Writing Help

Case Studies Writing Help

MYOB Perdisco Assignment Help

Presentation Assignment Help

Proofreading & Editing Help