Application for Research Ethics Sample
Introduction
“Green supply chain management” is one of the suitable processes to enhance logistics through green processing to recycle the trash and utilise it as product clarification. In this current scenario, the business proposal will be prepared in terms of “reduce, reuse, recycle, reclaim and degradable”as well. On the other hand, it has been focusing on green management to increase business sustainability and CSR for increasing awareness among consumers. Apart from that, the majority of the study discussion will discuss the business objectives associated with theoretical approaches onwards. Hence, it will provide knowledge related to sustainability and the process of enhancing CSR onwards.
Aim and Objectives
Aim of the context is to describe the level of sustainability and CSR increment through enhancing the green supply chain management.
Objectives are;
- To identify the issues related to the conventional supply chain system for recycling the products properly
- To evaluate the context of actions related to the supply chain processing for making the trash recycled and reclaimed
- To analyse the advantageous factors and outcomes by installing green supply chain management system within the organisation
- To discuss the CSR level and increasing sustainability after implementing green supply chain management within the business sectors
Literature review
“Green supply chain management” is one of the potential parts of the conventional supply chain system where the organisation is depicting their process outsourcing. Suryanto et al. (2018) have argued on the context of the supply chain system and the way it has been making the business sustainable for a longer time. Gong et al. (2019) have justified the ideas related to the conventional supply chain and have mentioned the necessity of recycling trash. Apart from that, it has been showing the necessity of maintaining the trash and controlling their mismanagement by recycling the degradable for making the ecosystem sustainable. Several theoretical approaches will be appropriate to discuss green supply chain management whereas “triple bottom line theory” will be the particular one as well.
“Triple bottom line theory” has three specific sections such as planet, profits and people which will justify the clarity within the business. Bui et al. (2021) have mentioned the quality of the system where people matter along with the environmental processing for understanding the equilibrium. People have been denoted as the potential consumer within the organisations who are able to justify the quality of work and the bonding with the organisation. Allaoui et al. (2019) have mentioned the incorporation associated with the environment where it has mentioned the necessity of ecosystem protection. Therefore, it will define the process of making connections with the degradable and the way it will reduce contamination.
Profit will identify the process of enhancing the financial infrastructure and the way it will enhance revenue growth positively. Schinckus et al. (2019) have included ideas and knowledge to justify the process of making the economic structure stronger. Current scenario will justify the process of making changes within the business strategies where green supply chain management will enhance the process of business development. However, the business plan can assume the profit increment of almost up to 30% within the next 5 years and the way it will make the study justifiable.
Planet will identify the process of making the environment secure and healthier that can enrich the business process positively. Kholaif and Ming (2022) have mentioned the process of understanding business management through environmental management pervasively. Hence, green supply chain management will justify the process of recycling the degradable and the process of reusing for making the environment clean and least contaminated. Chen et al. (2018) have identified the process of making changes within business planning for understanding environmental sustainability.
Hence, the current scenario will incorporate the business processing and the environmental sustainability to make the supply system viable to the potential consumers. On the contrary, the theoretical approaches have also encountered the necessity of reducing the air contamination and the process of making the ecosystem healthiest as well. Eventually, the preliminary argument and study have given clear ideas associated with business planning and the conventional supply chain system. On the other hand, it will discuss the implications of the green supply chain system and the process of incorporating the recycling system and its application.
Proposed methods
This business proposal will follow the proper level of methodology to imply the plan accurately by meeting all the requirements onwards. Abdel-Baset et al. (2019) have mentioned identifying the accurate method for processing the business plan along with its implications for betterment in the future. Current business plan will incorporate “interpretivism” as the philosophical approach along with “inductive research approach” for clarifying the observation in the practical assessments. On the contrary, the present business plan will mention the business strategy with “qualitative” for quality analysis along with “descriptive research design” to highlight the business planning as well. Notteboom et al. (2020) have included the criteria related to the business methodology and the flexibility to utilise the planning as well. Current scenario will incorporate the “thematic analysis” for data interpretation and data extraction so that it will make the plan successful on CSR and sustainability increment.
The current business plan will highlight the collection of data from reliable resources from “Google Scholar, and ProQuest” and the books, journals and articles related to green supply chain management. Kumar et al. (2019) have included the ideas and knowledge indicated the business planning where it incorporates the business strategies in their integrated management. Hence, the business plan will have the retinol clarification on the betterment of CSR so that potential consumers will understand the importance of green supply chain management. The collected information will be “secondary qualitative” within this context and it will focus only on the non-numeric values so that it can identify the factors associated with product quality. However, this current scenario will describe the necessity of customer bonding and the process of increasing faith and belief to make them understandable regarding the business growth.
Timeline
Figure 1: Activity planning
Reference list
Abdel-Baset, M., Chang, V. and Gamal, A., 2019. Evaluation of the green supply chain management practices: A novel neutrosophic approach. Computers in Industry, 108, pp.210-220.
Allaoui, H., Guo, Y. and Sarkis, J., 2019. Decision support for collaboration planning in sustainable supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, pp.761-774.
Bui, T.D., Tsai, F.M., Tseng, M.L., Tan, R.R., Yu, K.D.S. and Lim, M.K., 2021. Sustainable supply chain management towards disruption and organizational ambidexterity: A data driven analysis. Sustainable production and consumption, 26, pp.373-410.
Chen, Y., Wang, S., Yao, J., Li, Y. and Yang, S., 2018. Socially responsible supplier selection and sustainable supply chain development: A combined approach of total interpretive structural modeling and fuzzy analytic network process. Business strategy and the environment, 27(8), pp.1708-1719.
Gong, R., Xue, J., Zhao, L., Zolotova, O., Ji, X. and Xu, Y., 2019. A bibliometric analysis of green supply chain management based on the Web of Science (WOS) platform. Sustainability, 11(12), p.3459.
Kholaif, M.M.N.H.K. and Ming, X., 2022. COVID-19’s fear-uncertainty effect on green supply chain management and sustainability performances: the moderate effect of corporate social responsibility. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, pp.1-22.
Kumar, A., Mangla, S.K., Luthra, S. and Ishizaka, A., 2019. Evaluating the human resource related soft dimensions in green supply chain management implementation. Production Planning & Co
Notteboom, T., van der Lugt, L., van Saase, N., Sel, S. and Neyens, K., 2020. The role of seaports in green supply chain management: Initiatives, attitudes, and perspectives in Rotterdam, Antwerp, North Sea Port, and Zeebrugge. Sustainability, 12(4), p.1688.
Schinckus, C., Akbari, M. and Clarke, S., 2019. Corporate social responsibility in sustainable supply chain management: an econo-bibliometric perspective. Theoretical Economics Letters, 9(01), p.247.
Suryanto, T., Haseeb, M. and Hartani, N.H., 2018. The correlates of developing green supply chain management practices: Firms level analysis in Malaysia. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 7(5), p.316.
Know more about UniqueSubmission’s other writing services:
