ASB/ABJ 4115 Management Research Assignment Sample 2024
Introduction
Sustainability of Supply Chain Management (SCM) indicates the efforts of the company that can consider the human influences and environmental factors associated with the products through the application of the supply chain. Supply chain management can link with the sourcing of the raw materials, manufacturing process, storage, delivery procedures of products, and methods of transportation that attach to the business progression.
The chosen journal articles are useful for identifying appropriate methodologies and methods to serve as a conception for continuing the assignments. The concepts of SCM can be effective for a business organization to develop efficiencies and save expenses that can be critically evaluated through the ideal methods, which have already been used in previous times. The information is taken from reliable sources to avoid complications in research.
Discussion
Methodology
Research Methods
The main function of this section of methodology is to provide a systematical analysis of a sustainable supply chain through the identification of key elements. In order to do this mixed methodology is used in various Supply Chain management studies. According to Koberg and Longoni, (2019) various articles used the qualitative and quantitative method because it has the most reliability. In mixed-method research, the comparative weakness of a company is reduced with the use of comparative strength.
The mixed-method helped to collect different data on the same subject which increased the credibility of the research results. In order to increase the theoretical and material rigor and to search for a positive direction in the research mixed methodology can be used (Carter et al. 2019).
However, Zimon et al. (2020), boasts the use of only “qualitative data collection” will help to develop and implement Sustainable supply chain management. It is according to this journal it is also expressed that it will help to better understand the topic and help to better answer the issues that are found in the supply chains. In the qualitative research method, this article used the strategic framework to fulfil the requirements of sustainability.
The proper choice of methodology plays a vital role while answering the research questions. According to Cooper et al. (2006), the management questions are of three categories. It can be based on the objective or the purpose of the research, the requirements and solution of the research and on controlling the research situation.
It is seen that quantitative research methodology is based on scientific processes. According to Jia et al. (2018), the quantitative method is built on the survey and experiment. The data that that is collected through the experiment and survey is applied to the statistical process.
According to Jia et al. (2018), the most beneficial factor of quantitative methodology is that its outcomes can be reflected in the overall supply chain. It is also seen that according to this journal the quantitative method has the ability to deduce the resulting state.
According to Seuring (2013), Qualitative method is the best methodology to analyze the supply chain environments and the company actions. It also helps the research study to better understand supply chain development. The qualitative method is very much helpful in analyzing the information that is related to non-numerical.
According to Seuring (2013), unlike the quantitative methods the qualitative methods do not have a rigid procedure or rule the qualitative method is built on the dependency of data itself. The most important benefit that the qualitative method provides is that it provides a huge experience in supply chain management. The reason behind this is the dependency on various data.
In the case of the mixed method of supply chain management is useful in the supply chain. It is only because of the inclusion of both quantitative and qualitative management. According to Carter and Rogers (2008), mixed method of research is has both the “methods of enquiry” and “philosophical assumptions”.
It is seen that it includes mixed-method research is based on philosophical assumptions it helps in the data collection and analysis process of the gathered data. It is seen that it is the mixture of both the qualitative and quantitative it has the capability to solve the research problem separately. According Zailani et al. (2012), the mixed nature of this methodology is helpful in keeping the consistency of the research.
It is also seen that this article it is described the beneficial quality of the mixed research methodology in applying different data source or approach each time. It is among the various research methods the mixing method is considered superior while analyzing the various articles.
According to Craig et al. 2019, the focus has been provided on the factors of supply chain management and its future directions. Supply chain management and its evolution for the future have also been described in this article. The authors have used the systematic research method in this article in which they have used a set of peer-reviewed journals and articles to analyse the growth of the supply china management.
With the help of the systematic literature review, the author has prominently described the issues and causes of the issue that are being faced in supply chain management.
Differences and gap
The all resources are displayed the qualitative methods and a few articles can show the quantitative methods. It is one of the significant difference among the research methods so that makes a gap that reflects for proceeding the whole procedures of the research study. The most of the quantitative methods are not able to provide the particular outcomes so that the study can successful properly.
Research Strategy
According to Zimon et al. (2020), the strategy used in qualitative data management is liked by the company stakeholder. In research, Zimon et al. (2020) use the descriptive method for its design. It is only because the descriptive method is totally dependent on the data collection of the various sources.
Jia et al. (2018), also gives the same importance to the primary data collection method like surveys and interviews. It is only because it goes with the descriptive design of the research method. It is seen that the descriptive method is based on various theories. It is because of its theories the systemic process is followed in this case. In the case of data collection both Zimon et al. (2020) and Jia et al. (2018), uses data collection instrument like public comment, documentary and newspaper. One of the major benefits is that the descriptive method can go with all three types of methods.
However, in this case, the data collection strategies are created in relation to the explanatory method are very useful in research strategies. According to them, this research design is totally based on the research itself than the other form of external factors.
It is with the help of explanatory design various new ideas and beliefs can be built-in supply chain management. It is also seen that this research strategy will help to build the outcome based on self-judgment. However, in this case, it is seen that this article is based on the
According to Craig et al. 2019, the strategy that has been used in this article is related to the primary quantitative method. According to this method, it can be said that the issues of various organizations in different countries have been assessed thoroughly in this research.
Differences and gap
The quantitative research strategies are considered for proceeding the research study however, the qualitative research strategies are also required to get the accurate information to satisfy the whole research process. The differences are visible in the research strategies that effects to successful pathway of the particular research strategies.
As a result, the gap are transparently visible that creates barriers also the gap is shown from the authenticity of the data, and resources. It can delay the whole research study time that impacts negatively to complete the whole research study.
Research Design
According to Keskinocak and Tayur (2004), quantitative research methodology has used “non-experimental design” in its research study. It is seen that this kind of research design in the qualitative method includes various elements like numerical data and surveys. However, it is seen that it does not include the artificial scenario in its research study.
Keskinocak and Tayur (2004), stated that the measurement of various supply chain elements like the efficiency of the supply chain, the time is taken to process the materials in the supply chain, the demand of the supply chain, the elasticity of price in the supply chain can be measured with this research methodology.
It is seen that the traditional model of the supply chain is not possible to measure because of the lack of use of this model. However, in the case of internet-based management of the supply chain has the scope to apply the quantitative method.
According to Jia et al. (2018), the properly structured questions that are asked in the privacy data collection like an interview have the ability to maintain the consistency of the research. However, it is seen that because of its consistent nature it helps to reduce the biased decisions in the research method. It is also seen in this article.
In the case of primary data collection, the survey helps to get such data that is helpful in making the possible calculator in statistics. According to Jia et al. (2018), stated that the statistical data is helpful in making overall results in the longer term. In the case of data collection instruments, the four data collection instruments have used by Jia et al. (2018), in their study.
The four data collection methods are interview, structured observation, structured records based on the review and structured questionnaires. According to Jia et al. (2018), have put the survey results beyond the expectation of sustainable supply chain management research However, the negative consequence of these instruments is seen based on the reliability of these instruments on specific individuals. It is seen that the instrument that is used is measured on the basis of the intended results.
According to Zimon et al. (2020), the research design that is used in this article used three types of research design. The three research designs are data collection, data evolution, descriptive analysis and category selection. In the descriptive analysis, Zimon et al. (2020) used previous research results from various publications.
The backgrounds and the theoretical analysis have come under descriptive analysis. In the case of the data collection design, various data collection criteria are used based on inclusion and exclusion. In the case of category selection, various analytical dimensions and cateries are used. In the case of data evolution, various primary data are analyzed and sorted to get the best outcome for sustainable supply chain management.
According to Cooper et al. (2006), the best research design that goes with a supply chain management system is explorative research design. It is only because the explorative research design helps to focus on the various research problem. It is seen that at various times the research process is prevented by its problems.
The explorative research design can reduce the risks of the research. It is seen that in this article Cooper et al. (2006), mentioned that the explorative research design has been able to investigate in the research in the later period also. In order to gain knowledge about the problems, this knowledge is very much useful in the research.
According to Seuring (2013), the descriptive research design is the best research design. It is seen in this article Seuring (2013), give the importance of theory-based design. In the theory-based design, it is seen that the research design is based on the various experience of the researchers.
Therefore, there is a greater chance of success with the help of this design. According to Carter and Rogers (2008), the other article has given importance to descriptive research design. It is only because of the same beneficial qualities mentioned by Seuring (2013).
Differences and gap
Most of the collected resources are gathered the information based on the nin-experimental research design that can use for evaluating the data security area. On another side, the explorative research design is also visible in multiple resources that create a difference in the research study.
Moreover, the different kinds of opinions can establish a gap among the whole procedures of the research. The security regarding the data is one of the biggest gaps that delays the whole process and is highly time-consuming.
Sampling techniques
The sampling technique is one of the essential features of the research that enhances the authenticity of the research. In this case, completing the quantitative research a group is being selected from which the essential company data and opinions through open-ended questions are asked.
According to Cooper et al. (2006), the primary sampling techniques the researchers used the simple random sampling techniques for completing the research. According to Seuring (2013), the provided primary sampling techniques find the proper results in the research for the supply chain management.
According to Carter and Rogers (2008), the gathered information can easily be assembled in supply chain management, the sampling techniques provide the most accurate results in supply chain management. According Zailani et al. (2012), the research gets an equal chance to select the whole population in the world.
According to Keskinocak and Tayur (2004), the research considers the survey and interview as the primary data collection method. According to Koberg and Longoni (2019), the thematics and article review are selected as the secondary data collection method that is also considered in the study. According to Carter et al. (2019), the research conducts with the two types of sampling methods used in the research.
According to Zimon et al. (2020), another part of the sampling technique is the non-probability method that accumulates the research topic in supply chain management. According to Zimon et al. (2019), probability sampling techniques refer to the methods for every respondent in the research. According to Jia et al. (2018), the study considers the development of supply chain management through survey and interviews.
Differences and gap
The primary sampling techniques are mostly shown in the identified resources which is not appropriate to proceed with the whole study successfully. The differences make a potential gap that delays the whole research process.
Data collection method
According to Cooper et al. (2006), in the case of the data collection method, the primary mode is the best method of data collection. The primary mode of data collection enables to avoid misunderstanding of various concepts in supply chain management.
It is seen that in the second method of data collection there is a chance of clashing the various concepts. In the primary data collection method, Cooper et al. (2006) use interviews and surveys as the instrument of the data collection method.
According to Seuring (2013), sustainable supply chain management needs both the primary and secondary data collection methods. According to Seuring (2013), states that the use of both the materials helps to gain the overall view of the sustainable supply chain management.
According to Carter and Rogers (2008), the primary data collection method is the best way of collectinmg the data related to supply chain management. According to these writers supply, chain management requires experience strategically hand. It does not build on the theoretical knowledge of the supply chain. Therefore, the experiences management acn better able to provide data related to the supply chain.
According Zailani et al. (2012), the supply chain needs the primary data collection method because of the unavailability of data in th esecondary method. According to Keskinocak and Tayur (2004), both the data collection method is useful in the supply chain. It is because of these two methods that experience and practical knowledge are combined.
According to Koberg and Longoni (2019), the primary data collection method is the proper way of data collection in the supply chain management system. The experience of the managers has the better knowledge in this case.
Differences and gap
There have an equal ratio of both primary and secondary data analysis methods that are quite essential to achieve both the relevant facts after doing the whole research process. As a result, the gap is clearly notified that impacts the study to gain the satisfactory outcomes.
Themes of the articles
According to Carter and Rogers (2008), the theme of sustainable supply chain management and its framework has been mentioned in this article. According to the study of Carter et al. (2019), the future direction of supply chain management has been emphasized.
According to the study by Cooper et al. (2006), the theme of business research and its relation to supply chain management has been included in this study. According to the study by Jia et al. (2018), the theme that has been emphasized is related to the supply chain and its impact on different countries. According to the study by Keskinocak and Tayur (2004), the theme of data collection in the supply chain has been performed.
According to the article by Koberg and Longoni (2019), the thematic system literature review of supply chain management has been mentioned.
According to the study by Seuring (2013), the theme of the modelling approach of supply chain management has been elaborated. Zailani et al. (2012) stated about supply chain management and emphasized the context of Malaysia. According to the article of Zimon et al. (2019), the theme of implementation of supply chain management and the result has been included.
According to the article of Zimon et al. (2020), the drivers of supply chain management and its effect and impact on the business have been properly emphasized.
Quality of methodology and Recommendations for improvement
The multiple resources are shown the different kinds of conception and depending on that the assignments are going forward. Moreover, it can capable to serve as a final outline regarding the strategies, designs, and methods in methodologies regarding the topics.
The application of the SCM increases the ratio of sustainability in business that influences global business procedures. As a result, researching multiple facts there have derived several methods like mixed methods and it defines both the qualitative and quantitative methods for collecting information regarding the sustainability of supply chain management. After judging the all chosen articles that are related to the concepts of SCM, it indicates to improve the procedures.
According to the opinion authors Koberg and Longoni, (2019), have shown descriptive analyses where all of the individual factors that relate to the global supply chain are measured.
The material collection procedures, evaluations, and category identification are highly crucial to secure the whole business process. Therefore, it can suggest that, introducing the support of the technology to develop the whole pattern so that multiple companies are gained confidence regarding security.
On another side, most of the articles highly focused on the three types of sustainability of SCM that influences the business enough. Depending on that, it can suggest that the concept of SCM is to be responsible for developing the inventory, and efficiencies of the company. Similarly, it can maintain a distribution network and relationship with a stakeholder that comes out after analyzing the concepts of SCM.
Conclusion
In concluding note, the chosen articles journals are capable to serve an idea regarding the concepts of the SCM with the collaboration of the methods, strategies, and designs of the methodologies. As a result, the study achieves a vision to process the rest of the parts to apply the appropriate methodologies. Therefore, the multiple resources are served different kinds of opinions that make a complication and differences.
The complexity is to be responsible for creating the gaps among the similar concepts of methodologies sections. The chosen methods, strategies, and design are effective that serve the appropriate vision. Therefore, it can be possible for delivering an accurate idea after improving or changing some facts. The discussion parts are useful to reach the part and serve the outcomes as respective of the particular study.
References
Carter, C.R. and Rogers, D.S., 2008. A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management.
Carter, C.R., Hatton, M.R., Wu, C. and Chen, X., 2019. Sustainable supply chain management: continuing evolution and future directions. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.
Cooper, D.R., Schindler, P.S. and Sun, J., 2006. Business research methods (Vol. 9, pp. 1-744). New York: Sustainable supply chain management Mcgraw-hill.
Jia, F., Zuluaga-Cardona, L., Bailey, A. and Rueda, X., 2018. Sustainable supply chain management in developing countries: An analysis of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, pp.263-278.
Keskinocak, P. and Tayur, S., 2004. Due date management policies. In Handbook of quantitative supply chain analysis (pp. 485-554). Springer, Boston, MA.
Koberg, E. and Longoni, A., 2019. A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management in global supply chains. Journal of cleaner production, 207, pp.1084-1098.
Seuring, S., 2013. A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management. Decision support systems, 54(4), pp.1513-1520.
Zailani, S., Jeyaraman, K., Vengadasan, G. and Premkumar, R., 2012. Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) in Malaysia: A survey. International journal of production economics, 140(1), pp.330-340.
Zimon, D., Tyan, J. and Sroufe, R., 2019. Implementing sustainable supply chain management: Reactive, cooperative, and dynamic models. Sustainability, 11(24), p.7227.
Zimon, D., Tyan, J. and Sroufe, R., 2020. Drivers of sustainable supply chain management: Practices to alignment with un sustainable development goals. International Journal for Quality Research, 14(1).
Know more about UniqueSubmission’s other writing services:
