AURTTA3018 Diagnostic Procedure Assignment Sample
Here’s the best sample of AURTTA3018 Diagnostic Procedure Assignment, written by the expert.
Introduction
This study includes the WHS regulations and requirement in the diagnostic test process. It provides the detail on different equipments and guideline for defining the results of diagnostic test.
Diagnostic procedure
Work health and safety (WHS) legislation is important for preventing the any accidents and injuries possible to organizational people at workplace. The WHS regulations should be used during diagnostic testing process that requires different equipments and processes like first-aid box, protective and security cloths, health and safety training, define organizational hazards, etc. (Gallagher and Underhill, 2012).
There are several PPE and equipments that are required during the diagnostic testing:
- Eye safety goggle
- Laboratory coats
- Chemical resistant gloves and apron
- Face shields or face masks
- Body safety gowns
- Safety glasses
In order to localize the fault, different diagnostic methods can be used by the organization to remove the health and safety problems. The removal and replacement, dismantling, and adjusting are the methods of eliminating and finding the fault (Johnstone and Tooma, 2012). Additionally, the visual and aural identification method can also be utilized in the diagnostic testing of the fault. The diagnosis can also be on & off-site, indoor & outdoor and on & off-shore according to the situation of the testing.
In order to remove the problem, the organization can use an effective method that can remove or narrow down the system. The removal and replacement, dismantling, and adjusting is an effective process of diagnostic. This method defines the faults and provides effective way to remove it by the use of replacement and adjustment. In the organization, WHS regulations can be applied by making employees understand about different benefits and profits. This process is planned after discussion with the management team to define its benefits for the organization and employees (Moons et al., 2012). In this plan, a test is organized in the company that defines the specific fault which is creating the problem in success. This fault can be spread out in the overall organization if no solution is provided. In this test, different diagnostic equipments are required for successfully implementing the strategy.
All employees and workers are invited in the diagnostic test and define its benefits. During the test, it is also analyzed that all the employees helped in this diagnostic test. The other faults are excluded in this test by defining their possible impacts and reasons in an effective manner (Zhang et al., 2014). The reasons of other faults are also clarified to get the original results of the test. The diagnostic test provided the cause of the problem but it is also ensured by the organization that it is main cause of the fault by the organizational analysis. The cause finding analysis is very helpful to define the original fault in the organization.
The symptoms and causes are also differentiated by the use of appropriate methods and tools. The cause defines the problem but the symptoms shows the results of the problems. The diagnostic of the fault requires the identification card and employee card as a document. The organization has a responsibility to provide the solution of the fault (Barr and Welch, 2012). The quality level of the diagnostic test should be maintained to provide effective solution of the problem. The quality procedure should fulfill the requirement of the standards and company policy.
Conclusion
From the above study, it is concluded that the diagnostic test helps the organization to find out the faults. It is also concluded that a proper diagnosis of fault can be effective to identify the root cause and provide better solution.
References
Barr, J. and Welch, A., 2012. Keeping nurse researchers safe: workplace health and safety issues. Journal of advanced nursing, 68(7), pp.1538-1545.
Gallagher, C. and Underhill, E., 2012. Managing work health and safety: recent developments and future directions. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), pp.227-244.
Moons, K.G., de Groot, J.A., Linnet, K., Reitsma, J.B. and Bossuyt, P.M., 2012. Quantifying the added value of a diagnostic test or marker. Clinical chemistry, 58(10), pp.1408-1417.
Zhang, P., Lingard, H., Blismas, N., Wakefield, R. and Kleiner, B., 2014. Work-health and safety-risk perceptions of construction-industry stakeholders using photograph-based Q methodology. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(5), p.04014093.
________________________________________________________________________________
Know more about UniqueSubmission’s other writing services:
