BSS057-6 Corporate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Assignment Sample
Module code and Title: BSS057-6 Corporate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Assignment Sample
Introduction
Patching is considered as a strategic process through which corporate executives tend to routinely remap overall business in terms of changing the opportunities of the market. It can aid in taking the form of splitting, adding, exiting, transferring as well as exiting. This acts as an efficient measure of management technique which includes key aspects such as acquiring, identifying, testing as well as installing the code changes in TUI. The purpose of this study is to focus upon the context of patching in the dimension of corporate entrepreneurship and role of patching so as to address a crisis situation in a prominent manner in TUI.
Introduction to the company
TUI group is identified as a German leisure, travel as well as tourism frm which is headquartered in Hanover, Germany. The wide portfolio being gathered under this particular group signified strong tour operators, 1600 travel agencies as well as a leading online portal of around five airlines comprising 150 aircraft, 400 hotels, 16 cruise lines along with numerous incoming agencies in the global interface (TUI GROUP, 2021).
The predominant feature of TUI group is that the corporate culture is accosted as the global responsibility in terms of economic, social as well as environmental responsibility. This in turn reflects a broad array towards the key aspect of sustainable tourism which is being considered its objective.
Patch 1 Critical analysis of entrepreneurial architecture process
The predominant essence of a particular patchwork is that it comprises predominant characteristics of small sections and the sections are being finalised in a retrospective manner and stitched together. In terms of the process of entrepreneurial architecture, it depends upon the routines, norms, structures as well as key channels that aids in influencing the behaviour of an individual within a strategic mould (Arshi and Burns, 2018).
It also aims to enable a prominent flow of knowledge as well as innovation for the society. According to Houman Andersen and Laursen (2021), patch management also helps in keeping the computers as well as networks secure, up to date and reliable with key features and seek functionality where the business considers it significant.
This is also regarded as an integral tool to determine and document compliance with regards to policies of securities and privacies. For instance, in the case of TUI group, it would play an inevitable role in improving the performance through the help of software upgradation.
Given pressure upon the changes, complexities as well as competitions leaders are found to proclaim significance of innovation. Despite this, organisational innovation needs proper management of creativity. According to the Amabile climate theory, it can be stated that creativity is considered as the making as well as communication of new insights and connection where innovation is considered as the implementation of the same dimensions.
For the purpose of addressing innovation challenges in the case of TUI, it is essential for leaders and the business owners to manage both creativity and innovation in a similar sphere. Incorporation of this facet specific approach can help in the promotion of a predominant deal of progress.
However, in some cases diverse aspects as well as findings are found to make synthetic integration challenging. In order to make the dimensions more complex, the climate for creativity is stated as a multi level construct. It can be evaluated as well as assessed that at the “individual psychological level it is a group or team evaluation.
Figure 1: Amabile climate-centric model for organisational creativity (Source: As Inspired by Hoßbach et al. 2019)
The framework here is found to outline certain relevant antecedents which aids in having an impact on the individual psychological, team as well as organisational climate. The variables mentioned in the figure can state that leadership levers are significant venues for certain climatic creation. Other than this, the elements of the external environment are more transformable.
Application of Amabile climate-centric model for organisational creativity with respect to TUI, can help leaders in having a direct influence on the key aspects of climate which focuses upon both creativity as well as innovation (Arunachalam et al. 2018). Here, with respect to the case of TUI within a networked environment, it can try to seek proper maintenance of software version consistency and at the same time conduct a centralised patch management. The climate in such cases tends to have a dynamic as well as inspiring quality and individuals in such cases are found to be both joyful and meaningful.
A centralised patch management further automates the degree of control in terms of the process of patch management. For instance, in the case of TUI, if a particular patch is being determined to be challenging, the business can aid in configuring proper patch management software for the purpose of patch prevention thereby being deployed the same.
Centralised patch management within TUI also helps in conserving the internet bandwidth which allows the computer to download the same. The patch management server can download the same once and distribute it to the computers designated in receiving the same. In today’s scenario, it has been found that security is accounted as a predominant concern for the business regardless of the sizes within TUI.
Software manufacturers are found to consistently adopt in upgrading the securities within the software as well as hardware for the purpose of staying one step ahead of the cybercriminals (Wasowskaet al. 2018). In addition to this, a patch is considered as a key change to a program which is being designed to fix, improve as well as update the same for TUI.
Apart from this, it can be stated that entrepreneurial architecture helps in merging between the IT as well as business world for the purpose of expanding the portfolio of a particular business. Howbere, the management of data EA enables firms such as TUI in predicting the future frameworks that can help in building high return on investment. It would also help TUI in expanding its operation in a cost effective as well as agile way.
The role of entrepreneurial architecture in terms of promoting innovation within the large firms is found to receive considerable and empirical attention (Arshi and Burns, 2019). This in turn would help TUI to properly conceptualise the aspect of innovation and its output factors. The output measures aid in reflecting the primary form of goods and services.
The factors of innovation are further represented within the scale of innovation and also act as a valid measure. It can also help in constructing progressive mindsets along with skills thereby benefiting the community along with the markets.
Leaders within the TUI can ensure influence of involvement through the active involvement of others in the goal as well as direction setting instead of the goal development. It can be also attained by demonstration of interest in developing careers of the individual and offering praise as well as recognition for key achievement along with productive performance.
Patch 2: Change process
Patchwork management is considered as an effective measure of resolving issues occurring in software and applications which are generally used by corporate entrepreneurs. Several issues occur while managing important business information through improved software. Several cyber-attacks can take place which delay the process of proper execution of data management by help of this software.
As opined by Haydock, (2019), patchwork management seems to be an effective measure to resolve issues like this. This mentioned software can be accessed by multiple users and they are given authority to create required modifications in this software. Patchwork brings about integration among all these modifications so that data can be managed in a proper way through this.
As per given case study, this whole discussion on patchwork management pivots around a renowned tourism group named “Tourism Union International (TUI)”, situated in Germany. This group is run by proficient corporate entrepreneurs and they operate across the whole world.
A huge amount of information and data are managed by this organisation for which they need to make use of an improved technology like Patchwork management. There are several processes which can facilitate proper functioning of patchwork management, such as “Force field analysis” and “Kaleidoscope”.
Figure 2: Force field analysis (Source: As inspired by Mak and Chang, 2019)
These measures are effective in processing change in order to evaluate management of the “change process” implemented by the TUI organisation. As per the opinion of Mak and Chang, (2019), “Force Field Analysis” refers to several tools which are effective to identify root causes and provide ways to resolve those causes after identification. Main idea of this model is any issue occurring is the result of multiple forces.
It might be opposite to the present situation, or it can also be complementary to it. This model is a popular “Change Management Model” and hugely used by corporate entrepreneurs. This also helps make important decisions and decision making is an important factor of running an international business.
As attitude by Xu, (2018), there are several; important steps involved in this mentioned model, such as, “Assessing present situation”, “Defining objectives of that change”, “Identification of important driving forces”, “Identification of restraining forces”, “Evaluating those forces” and finally “Developing an action plan”.
Through this, TUI would be able to critically analyse issues prevalent within their business planning. Patch management is considered significant fixing vulnerabilities on the software and application which are further being susceptible to certain cyber-attacks which help the business in seeking reduction of security challenges. Software updates are further considered significant as they comprise critical patches to certain security holes.
For instance, many harmful malware attacks are found to seek advantage of the software vulnerabilities in common applications such as operating systems as well as browsers. A comprehensive IT patch management policy is accounted as a prominent insurance against network software as well as hardware which is prone to bugs and vulnerabilities which might disrupt critical business processes (Manolovaet al. 2019).
Patch management fixes vulnerabilities on the software as well as applications which are susceptible to the cyber-attacks and helps firms in reduction of security risks. After that, though the second step, they would be defining their objectives for which that change are required. After completing that step, important driving forces and restraining forces are to be identified by managers of this organisation.
Critical evaluation of those forces is to be done after proper execution of former steps. Finally, an action plan is to be developed based on the requirements of this organisation. Therefore, it can be said that, “Force field analysis” is quite appropriate to facilitate change in organisations like TUI by which they can resolve several issues to improve their business performance.
Patch management is considered significant for the key aspects such as security, system uptime, compliance and feature enhancements. It helps in fixing up certain vulnerabilities on the software as well as applications which are susceptible to certain cyber-attacks which help the firms in seeking reduction of security risks.
Patch management determines the software and key applications which are kept up to date and run in a seamless manner which supports system uptime (de Los Reyes Jr, 2019). Other than this, with a consistent rise in the cyber attacks, the business firms are found to be needed by regulatory bodies in seeking maintenance of predominant level of compliances.
It is considered as an essential piece to adhere to several compliance standards. In addition to this, patch management is considered as a predominant piece to adhere to the compliance standards in a significant manner. It can further go beyond fixing software bugs which comprises the features as well as functionality updates taken into account.
Figure 3: Kaleidoscope (Source: As inspired by Kubeš and Kovacs, 2020)
Another effective model which deserves to be mentioned in this context is the “Kaleidoscope” model. As per opinion of Kubeš and Kovacs, (2020), the model of “Kaleidoscope” was developed by Balogun and Hope Hailey in 2002 which helps to facilitate change within an organisation. This model is illustrated in a round form in which the outer ring is concerned with several highlights of change measures which have enough potential to empower change.
Inner ring of this model is concerned with an effective list of “Usage choices” open to authorities bearing responsibility of implementing change. As mentioned by Haggblade and Resnick, (2018), there are several steps to undertake proper execution of “Kaleidoscope” model which are, “Proper assessment of constraints and contextual enablers”, “Making a plan for process of change” and “Proper selection of other options regarding those changes”. First step of this model would enable TUI to assess present constraints in that organisation.
By the help of the second step, an effective plan to implement required change is to be formulated by authorities of this mentioned organisation. In the final step, a process of selecting other options regarding those changes is to be initiated. Through these steps, TUI would be able to identify issues prevalent in their organisation and would be provided with effective measures to resolve those problems by implementing effective changes.
Therefore, it can be said that these above-mentioned models of change are very essential for international organisations to bring about necessary changes and thus improve their performance.
Patches can be accounted integral in determining which have a prominent aspect in offering the product. For instance, it takes hackers around 1-4 days to release an exploit attacking a particular hole and automate ways in fixing the windows Pcs along with servers. Patching turns out to be integral in testing the non production system before being loaded on the production system unless being documented in an approved “patch management procedure”.
Patching management can seek maintenance of proper network system integrity and data by application of the latest operating system as well as application of security updates and patches in a timely way (Khan et al. 2020). It also seeks establishment of a baseline methodology as well as a designated timeframe for the purpose of patching as well as confirming compliance of patch management.
Desktops, laptops, servers, applications along with network devices representing access points to certain sensitive as well as confidential company data along with access to the technology services and resources. Determining key updates as well as patches are being distributed which is necessary in maintaining proper systems with regards to stability and seek mitigation of malware exploitation along with security threats.
It also informs campus technical administrators when the new patches tend to be available. Other than this, coordination of the reviews of new patches with the campus patches test group and the patch severe administrators. The patch of integrities which are required to be verified through as comparisons of cryptographic hashes in ensuring acquisition of patch. Furthermore, the patches are required to be tested as well as evaluated prior to application in the production atmosphere determining that there are no adverse impacts as an outcome which is needed to be taken into consideration (Park and Park, 2021).
Furthermore, patchers are needed to seek development of corporate strategies and ensure overall set of the key business opportunities and then strategies tend to emerge from the individual businesses. By dynamically adjusting to changing market opportunities, the managers are found to focus upon high potential businesses in uncovering the level of profit and drive efficient strategy in the businesses.
It also creates a prominent economic value for the corporation thereby letting strategies emerge from certain individual businesses. Managers at patching firms pay extraordinary attention to the relevant size of the business units which might be small enough in determining agility and is enough for effectiveness. Patching is an integral in the corporate level strategic course of action which can develop extraordinary values by seeking dynamic stitching of the business quilt within the corporation.
Challenges related to patch management in the corporate entrepreneurship
Lack of improved IT management
Advanced information technology management is required for using patch management techniques. As mentioned by Song et al. (2020), IT professionals with knowledge of advanced IT management systems bear the responsibility of dealing with patchwork management systems. In TUI High level corporate entrepreneurs hire IT professionals to execute patch management systems for managing their business information in a secure way. If IT professionals are not much expert in this field, it would be problematic to conduct this type of advanced software tracking procedure.
Absence of high-quality technological infrastructure
High quality technological infrastructure is needed to incorporate patch management systems by corporate entrepreneurs. In context of TUI, Patch management is an advanced system of executing processes like reinstalling software, identifying bugs and resolving those errors. Through this way, important business information of TUI is managed in a secure measure. Lack of advanced technology can be considered as a hindrance for proper implementation of this mentioned measure by entrepreneurs at corporate level.
Patch management failures
Software updation is done in a secured measure through this patchwork management. As part of activities done by TUI, several types of computer software need to be updated once a week in context of corporate businesses. Errors or problems sometimes occur within this process. As suggested by Keso, (2018), computer programmes or software used by corporate entrepreneurs to manage their important information about business.
Updating software, fixing bugs and improving usability of that software are done by proper process of patchwork. If IT experts install a patch and mistakenly forget to reboot that system, patch failure occurs. By this, the whole process gets lagged and it results in delay of patch management system which hinders success of TUI.
Prolonged time consuming process
Process of patch management seems to be very time consuming as in this process, entrepreneurs first identify issues within their business data, after that they test and monitor those patches and finally, they deploy those patches to get resolved by security professionals. As per suggestion of Tan et al. (2022), a huge time is spent by IT professionals for identifying patches and resolving those.
It is sometimes difficult for TUI to find if any patch has occurred as it does not show notification to IT experts. As a result, whole process of identifying and resolving issues is delayed for professionals. Corporate entrepreneurs have to deal with huge amounts of data and delay in this process seems problematic for them to formulate further business planning.
Additional risks related to patchwork management
There are several risks associated with patch management systems which need to be taken into consideration by IT professionals while executing patchwork management systems. As stated by Haydock, (2019), there are several additional risks related to patchwork management like if it is not tackled in a right way, it might cause crashes of systems.
Several challenges are faced by TUI such as, hardware devices can be damaged in this way which is not desirable to happen at time of incorporating patch management systems. This problem can waste money and time and both of these are important for improving business performance of corporate entrepreneurs.
Recommendations
Figure 1: Steps of Patch Management System (Source: As inspired by Porcedda, 2018)
Improve IT performance
IT professionals sometimes make errors which cause delay in completion of patch management procedure to solve this issue, IT experts can consider use of a detailed “asset list” through which they would be able to prevent errors from happening and would get an overall idea of infrastructure. In this way, assets can be prioritized by them and a fast patch management procedure can be done.
As opined by Kavallieratos et al. (2019), in this context, improved software like “Microsoft Threat and vulnerability management tool” can be used. This mentioned software can be used to prevent vulnerability of this process and faulty configurations are identified.
Adopting high quality technology
Advanced technology is required to undertake developed measures to manage international and national business management. As per concept of Gentile and Serio, (2019), without technology, businesses cannot survive in competitive market of today’s world. IT experts need to have a clear idea about their technical devices, version of software, detail of their operating system and third party softwares and applications. Using multiple versions of single software in different systems can cause errors and it increases risks.
Consolidating multiple software can be a good option to prevent this issue from happening. Using different parts of single software is not right way to undertake proper patchwork management. Instead, IT experts are required to consider adhering with single performance of a software. Investing in technological gadgets and adopting developed technology is an effective way to improve business performance for corporate entrepreneurs.
Undertaking developed measures
Patch management techniques sometimes failed due to lack of knowledge about how to handle this process efficiently. This failure results in loss of money and time which is challenging for corporate entrepreneurs while dealing with business information. Software used in this context is required to be updated multiple times in a month.
As per suggestion of Mylrea and Gourisetti, (2018), in order to resolve this issue, IT experts need to check update notifications at first, assess requirement of those notifications and then deploy that process. In this way, patch management would be done on basis of real requirements and less time would be spent executing this procedure.
Fast going software
Patch management system is used by tech professionals to secure important information of corporate entrepreneurs. This whole process needs to be completed in less time as a huge amount of data is dealt by corporate entrepreneurs and business owners. Unfortunately, this entire process takes a prolonged time to be completed which is considered as a problem in this regard.
As conceptualized by Chu and Astillero, (2022), patches need to be applied as fast as possible immediately after those are identified by tech experts. In this way, this whole process can be done within a given time frame and there would be less chance of being attacked by software bugs. This is an effective way to solve issue of time-consuming nature of patch management systems.
Risk mitigation techniques
Risks need to be mitigated by IT professionals in process of undertaking patchwork management. Notification about patches comes first which gets noticed by tech experts. After that they are required to use proper configuration to mitigate issues shown by those patches. High quality techniques of risk mitigation can be adopted in this context through which several issues are resolved in less time.
Conclusion
This study highlights several important factors related to patchwork techniques in context of corporate business activities. Role of this mentioned process in risk mitigation has been explained in detail. Several challenges while implementing patchwork in corporate business activities are focused along with potential strategies in this study. Several theories regarding this context are mentioned here. Therefore, from this study a clear idea about patchwork management in corporate level can be derived.
Arunachalam, S., Ramaswami, S.N., Herrmann, P. and Walker, D., (2018). Innovation pathway to profitability: The role of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing capabilities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(4), pp.744-766.
Chu, Y. and Astillero, M.R., (2022). Research on the Impact of Entrepreneurial Learning on the Business Model Innovation of Startups. Proceedings of Business and Economic Studies, 5(3), pp.75-80.
de Los Reyes Jr, G., (2019). Institutional entrepreneurship for digital public health promotion: Challenges and opportunities. Health Education &Behavior, 46(2_suppl), pp.30S-36S.
Gentile, U. and Serio, L., (2019). Survey on international standards and best practices for patch management of complex industrial control systems: the critical infrastructure of particle accelerators case study. International Journal of Critical Computer-Based Systems, 9(1-2), pp.115-132.
Haggblade, S. and Resnick, D., (2018). Conceptualizing Key Drivers of Policy Change: An Introduction to the Kaleidoscope Model (No. 1878-2020-481). Haydock, W., (2019). A threadbare patchwork of support. Psychologist, 32, pp.48-51.
Haydock, W., (2019). A threadbare patchwork of support. Psychologist, 32, pp.48-51.
Hoßbach, C., Hoßbach, B. and Berg, (2019). Organizational Climate for Creativity. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Houman Andersen, P. and Laursen, L.N., (2021). Entrepreneurial strategies for MNCs: A typology. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 22(3), pp.191-202.
Hussain, S.T., Lei, S., Akram, T., Haider, M.J., Hussain, S.H. and Ali, M., (2018). Kurt Lewin’s change model: A critical review of the role of leadership and employee involvement in organizational change. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(3), pp.123-127.
Javed, A., Yasir, M. and Majid, A., (2018). Psychological factors and entrepreneurial orientation: could education and supportive environment moderate this relationship?.Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), 12(2), pp.571-597.
Kang, X. and Zeng, Y., (2022). Entrepreneurial Bricolage Based on Big Data and Artificial Intelligence Decision-Making. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, (2022).
Kavallieratos, G., Gkioulos, V. and Katsikas, S.K., (2019), May. Threat analysis in dynamic environments: The case of the smart home. In 2019 15th international conference on distributed computing in sensor systems (DCOSS) (pp. 234-240). IEEE.
Keso, T., (2018). Unidirectional patch management solution to isolated network.
Khan, S.H., Majid, A. and Yasir, M., (2020). Strategic renewal of SMEs: the impact of social capital, strategic agility and absorptive capacity. Management Decision.
Kubeš, J. and Kovacs, Z., (2020). The kaleidoscope of gentrification in post-socialist cities. Urban Studies, 57(13), pp.2591-2611.
Leonidou, E., Christofi, M., Vrontis, D. and Thrassou, A., (2020). An integrative framework of stakeholder engagement for innovation management and entrepreneurship development. Journal of Business Research, 11(9), pp.245-258.
Mak, A.H. and Chang, R.C., (2019). The driving and restraining forces for environmental strategy adoption in the hotel industry: A force field analysis approach. Tourism Management, 73, pp.48-60.
Manolova, T.S., Edelman, L.F., Shirokova, G. and Tsukanova, T., (2019). Youth entrepreneurship in emerging economies: can family support help navigate institutional voids?.Journal of East-West Business, 25(4), pp.363-395.
Mylrea, M. and Gourisetti, S.N.G., (2018), August. Blockchain for supply chain cybersecurity, optimization and compliance. In 2018 Resilience Week (RWS) (pp. 70-76). IEEE.
Park, Y.W. and Park, Y.J., (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility and Entrepreneurship for Sustainability. Springer Singapore.
Porcedda, M.G., (2018). Patching the patchwork: appraising the EU regulatory framework on cyber security breaches. Computer law & security review, 34(5), pp.1077-1098.
Qiu, H.S., Li, Y.L., Padala, S., Sarma, A. and Vasilescu, B., (2019). The signals that potential contributors look for when choosing open-source projects. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), pp.1-29.
Rennick, C. and McKay, K., (2018). Componential theories of creativity: A case study of teaching creative problem solving. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association, 3(2), pp.8-12.
Song, K.T., Kim, S.I. and Kim, S.H., (2020). A design for a hyperledger fabric blockchain-based patch-management system. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 16(2), pp.301-317.
Tan, X., Zhang, Y., Cao, J., Sun, K., Zhang, M. and Yang, M., (2022), April. Understanding the Practice of Security Patch Management across Multiple Branches in OSS Projects. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022 (pp. 767-777).
Villares-Varela, M., Ram, M. and Jones, T., (2018). Bricolage as survival, growth and transformation: the role of patch-working in the social agency of migrant entrepreneurs. Work, Employment and Society, 32(5), pp.942-962.
Wasowska, A., Obloj, K. and Ciszewska-Mlinaric, M., (2018). When does formalization contribute to entrepreneurial orientation? The moderating role of industry life cycle. Journal of East European Management Studies, 23(3), pp.377-403.
Xu, X., (2018), June. Force Field Analysis on the Transformation of Archival Management. In 2018 2nd International Conference on Education, Economics and Management Research (ICEEMR 2018) (pp. 274-276). Atlantis Press.
Zhang, F. and Li, Q., (2018), May. Security vulnerability and patch management in electric utilities: A data-driven analysis. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Radical and Experiential Security (pp. 65-68).
Know more about UniqueSubmission’s other writing services:
