Communication issues in Organisation Introduction

Introduction

A good communication plan establishes a strong relationship between the organisation, its employees and also the consumers. The organization is based on good communication to deliver its messages, innovation in the industry and every other information to enhance the organisation’s capabilities. Both the internal and external communication systems form an essential part of the organization and help create a communication channel. Various problems within the organisation are solved as a definite communication channel is introduced and established. This helps the organization have a hierarchy in place and better implementation and generation of plans and strategies.

Organisational communication

The implementation of new ideas or solving existing problems are based on a good communication plan. In my opinion, the plan is the core of establishing a strong relationship with the customers. A good plan will ensure that the company can communicate with customers and form a good relationship with them. In the modern era, the most potential channel for this is the social media platform (Graham, Dust and Ziegert, 2018). This will help the organisation communicate and even understand the needs and of its customers.

Importance of organisational communication

Communication is very important for the purpose and execution of the presented business plan. To make the communication system completely successful, it is very important to make the communication plan tactful. For the effective success of the communicative plan, it is important to organize joint discussion sessions for all organisations that are part of the scheme and the communication plan (Hu and Judge, 2017). It will help all the bodies to invent a sound plan that is highly imperative for the effective success of the communication plan. Communication is prime to the organisation’s development and in making the whole organisation’s structure come into action.

Issues of communication to work with stakeholders from different culture

The initial three issues that are looked at by the exiled chief will be founded on Hofstede’s Cultural measurements:

Power Distance Index

The main social measurement is the Power Distance Index. The force-distance list contrasts in each country. The premise of force-distance is the comprehension of the level of the disparity. There is a chain of importance of force in each country, and their adaptations of force are appropriated unexpectedly. For instance, nations, for example, Canada, will be more tolerant of force dissemination that is equivalent and ensure that everybody in the group is equivalent (Travaglino and Moon, 2020). Nations like Japan, then again ensure that their force chain of command is unblemished and everybody comprehends their part in the progressive system.

Administrators may have issues overseeing groups that have diverse force-distance indexes. Especially in multifaceted groups with a blend of individuals, some colleagues may anticipate a more synergistic exertion. Other colleagues will anticipate that the manager should apportion all around characterized jobs to everybody and hand them out many undertakings they need to finish. This could cause an irregularity in how the group capacities. The chiefs should be cautious and clear on the force lopsidedness they intend to execute. This will assist the group with understanding what force-distance is in the group and help them work better.

Individualism versus Collectivism

The second social measurement is Individualism versus Collectivism. Independence is the idea of putting their interests and prosperity over the gathering. Cooperation, then again, is the idea of putting the gathering before one’s requirements. Nations like the US and UK will, in general, be individualistic, and nations like Japan and China will, in general, be collectivistic. This is likewise a significant issue when the chief is rousing the group. Typically in individualistic nations, supervisors will persuade representatives by speaking to their necessities (Mandala and Astika, 2019). Collectivistic Countries administrators will pressure the gathering objectives and the appreciation that would come in finishing the objectives.

The present circumstance of individuals from blended foundations and alternate points of view will, in general, be troublesome. Another issue is in individualistic points of view; workers will need to participate in errands that would feature their qualities. They would prefer not to participate in assignments done by the entire gathering that may not feature their abilities and commitments. Then again, individuals from collectivistic foundations might be more open to bunch undertakings and may not participate in errands that will make them sparkle as a person.

Masculinity versus Femininity

The third social measurement is Masculinity Versus Femininity. This measurement investigation the route parts in a group are disseminated among guys and females. This measurement is that people are generalizations into specific qualities. Guys will, in general, act decisively, and females will, in general, be more discreet. Men aren’t viewed as great with connections and participation as ladies. The social parts of the manner in which sexual orientation varies in each country (De Clercq et al., 2019). In individualistic social orders like America, ladies will generally be dealt with similarly to men and will not consider the administration to treat them unexpectedly. They additionally take on different characteristically male characteristics, for example, being decisive. Yet, in nations like India, ladies will, in general, be more compliant. In any case, ladies in India will, in general, be similarly serious as well. Managers should take this into thought and attempt to see how to adjust the sexes in a group and how to ensure they are dealt with similarly. This is the main concern issue as it is significant for all individuals to be dealt with similarly and have an equivalent measure of jobs in the organization.

Effects of the communication issues

External issues of communication in an organization

The above issues are more founded on mentalities that one has dependent on one way of life. Another difficulty that can be featured is language obstruction. In many nations, colleagues will talk in their local language (Mahmud et al., 2020). This change can be hard for some who may not be as familiar with English or the basic language utilized. This may take some becoming acclimated to for workers to have the option to convey in a similar language. It likewise may mess up colleagues to communicate with one another. This may prompt gatherings inside the gathering and have groups cooperate with individuals from a similar social foundation.

Another issue is specialized strategies. Various societies will, in general, unexpectedly decipher tones. Various societies additionally have fluctuating methods of correspondence. Individuals from different societies may not comprehend certain discourse styles (Mihai, 2017). For example, in nations like the USA, supervisors will, in general, be more forceful and direct. This may not be acknowledged well by workers who hail from eastern nations. As they are not used to these direct, forceful tones, they may feel assaulted and like the director might be attempting to offend them. They may likewise be available to mockery, and different types of discourse utilized consistently in the climate.

Internal issues of communication in an organization

The last issue that will be illustrated is to guarantee that nobody culture overwhelms the gathering and how the gathering acts. As referenced already, various societies will have various perspectives thus regularly when the gathering has most of one culture. This prompts their way of life is the overwhelming element in the gathering. Directors should ensure that this doesn’t happen as it will make individuals from the gathering who are from different societies isolated and irritate them (Rathee et al., 2019). This will make them confront an unharmonious bunch of elements. Directors should strive to guarantee that different social contrasts in the gathering don’t turn into a conflict for the representatives. The ruling society may direct the work style of the gathering. This may not permit the variety of the to decidedly affect the work and the association culture. This decreases the nature of the work, and the commitment of every individual is lost.

Role of communication training providers to address communication issues

The first skill that managers need to have is observation. When dealing with cross-cultural teams, the manager should observe how each member is and how they operate. This allows the manager to be able to get to know members of the team. This allows the managers to also understand what cultural backgrounds they come from (Kero, 2018). It gives clarity to how the person’s beliefs, attitude and perspectives are shaped. It will also let managers understand the logic behind their decisions and how culture affects them. It will also give insight into how culture makes the employees vary in their work styles and ethics. Managers need to have active listening skills, empathy and curiosity. To best understand the cultural backgrounds of the employees.

The second skill that managers need to have is adaptability. They need to be able to gauge various situations and think on their feet on how to handle them. They should also be able to change their managerial style based on the new employees. Managers should not be rigid and expect team members to adapt to their culture. Instead, they should guide the team culture to fit all the employees and includes their perspectives (Wilczynski, 2021). The manager should balance maintaining their perspective while also adapting the perspectives of the employees in the team. The manager should gauge what parts of the culture should be adapted and what parts of the culture can the team do without.

The third skill that managers need to have is self-awareness. Everyone has internalised biases and opinions on various cultures. The managers need to be self-aware of their biases to ensure that their cultural biases do not affect the treatment of the employees. In cross-cultural teams, these biases could lead to an aggressive environment and antagonised employees. The manager should be calm and reflective when a certain employee does not act according to their bias of a culture (Ruck, Welch and Menara, 2017). Managers should listen and pay attention to their employees instead of making judgments about them based on their cultural background. An example of a cultural bias would be assuming Asian people are good with numbers and technology. These biases may interfere in assigning roles to people where they excel and not fully let them tap their potential.

The fourth skill that managers need is communication skills. Communication is very important when managing a cross-cultural team as not everyone knows the same language or is well versed in English. The manager should be able to communicate with their team effectively. This requires the ability to word sentences properly to make sure that the team members can grasp what the managers expect from them. It also entails that the manager doesn’t use words such as slang or words that are too complicated for the employees to comprehend. They should effectively use their communication skills to build relationships with the employees (Karczewski and Karczewska, 2018). The employees should understand and form a rapport with the manager for the team to be effective. Managers can build this by understanding how to communicate with the employees to strengthen the relationship between them.

Conclusion

The manager often acts as the glue of the team. This is why they need to be able to make the team work effectively together. They should be able to coordinate the various roles of the team between the members and make sure that each member has a well-defined role and can work together like a well-oiled machine. This ensures that I have to make employees understand that they are available to them in case of any problems. They should be prompt in solving conflicts and resolving any issues within the team (Hu and Judge, 2017). They should be effective in making the various cultures come together and not allow anyone culture to dominate. They should be mindful of the cultural differences of the employees and make sure their strategies incorporate all the cultures to the best of their abilities. Incorporate simple activities such as team lunch, monthly team outings and birthday parties to ensure team bond and their relationship strengthen and grow.

References

Karczewski, L. and Karczewska, K., 2018. Intrapersonal Communication as a Basis of Communication in Organisation. Przegląd Nauk StoSowaNych Nr 18, p.9.
Ruck, K., Welch, M. and Menara, B., 2017. Employee voice: an antecedent to organisational engagement?. Public Relations Review, 43(5), pp.904-914.
Wilczynski, P., 2021. Prizing the Role of the Board of a non-profit organisation. A Managerial Approach.
Kero, A., 2018. Fostering Corporate Reputation and Corporate Brand of a Non-profit Organisation by Developing Communication.
Rathee, G., Sharma, A., Kumar, R. and Iqbal, R., 2019. A secure communicating things network framework for Industrial IoT using blockchain technology. Ad Hoc Networks, 94, p.101933.
Mihai, R., 2017. Corporate communication management. A management approach. Valerian Journal of Economic Studies, 8(2), pp.103-110.
Mahmud, N., Zulfikri, N.K.M., Ismail, I. and Miskam, Z., 2020. BARRIERS TO EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION IN AN ORGANISATION: A CASE OF SELECTED MULTINATIONAL COMPANY IN MALAYSIA. e-Academia Journal, 9(1).
De Clercq, K., Dietrich, A., Núñez Velasco, J.P., De Winter, J. and Happee, R., 2019. External human-machine interfaces on automated vehicles: effects on pedestrian crossing decisions. Human factors, 61(8), pp.1353-1370.
Mandala, I.G.N.A.K. and Astika, I.B.P., 2019. Effect of work environment, quality of system and work culture on the satisfaction of accounting information system user. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 6(4), pp.37-43.
Travaglino, G.A. and Moon, C., 2020. Power distance orientation is an antecedent of individuals’ intentions to engage in radical political action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.
Hu, J. and Judge, T.A., 2017. Leader–team complementarity: Exploring the interactive effects of leader personality traits and team power distance values on team processes and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(6), p.935.
Graham, K.A., Dust, S.B. and Ziegert, J.C., 2018. Supervisor-employee power distance incompatibility, gender similarity, and relationship conflict: A test of interpersonal interaction theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(3), p.334.