Inter Professional Working In Health and Social Care Assignment Sample
ASSIGNMENT 2: THE CASE STUDY ANALYSIS OF INTER-PROFESSIONAL WORKING ON “BABY L’S CIRCUMSTANCES”
Introduction
The main focus of this task is on the “Inter-Professional working” process within “health and social care” to provide a suitable working environment to the patients. This task is compressed with a case study of a baby’s hospitalisation where the entire hospital authority has followed the interprofessional working principles and disciplines by maintaining a team collaborative approach. In this section, there is eventual knowledge about the key concepts and aspects of inter-professional working with the presence of collaborative culture. Related issues and practices of interprofessional working within a context of “health and social care” are also critically discussed in this section to enhance the in-depth understanding of the interprofessional working approaches.
Main body
The inter-professional working approach indicates the maintenance of a collaborative attitude within a professional workplace to manage the working circumstances by providing similar respect for each other. This can be mentioned as an influential role in the professional workplace while it influences directly to the workers. Hence, it can be said that the maintenance of interprofessional working disciplines and principles is an effective factor in the place of “health and social care”. As per the views of Betancourt et al. (2005), the interprofessional working approach is used to maintain the collaborative performance in the team working environment to enhance the quality of managerial operations. In this case, it is necessary to say that the involvement of collaborative inter-professional working approaches influences the health sectors directly. Since, the workers of a health sector mainly focused on their patient’s well being rather than any kinds of critical barriers as it has a great impact on the patient’s well being performance.
According to the case study of a baby L, it has been noticed that the entire authority of the health sector where the child was admitted became focused on the child safety and health improving operations by considering the collaborative attitude. The three-month aged child was admitted to a hospital due to serious health injuries while both legs were fractured with having around 5 rib fractures. During this critical situation, the family members of the child have provided ultimate support and care as well as the hospital authority that has helped the child to recover fully from the injuries. As per the studies of Opeleet al. (2020), the lack of proper support in a child’s health improvement process is capable of reducing the health by affecting their mental as well as physical stability.
From the findings of the case study, it has been understood that the relationship among the family members was not quite good as the father of the child had two children in his previous marital relationship apart from the injured children. In addition, there is a presence of a traumatic history of the parents of baby L while the parents had multiple relationships in pre-birth and post birth situation of baby L. This kind of issue can be mentioned as a major effective factor in the well being of a child as the presence of multiple relationships with having half siblings is capable of breaking down the required concern for the newborn baby. According to the discussion of Guraya and Barr (2018), there is a high influence of lacking proper systematic support in the health sector while there is a high chance of facing unexpected accidental cases due to lack of proper supervision.
The lack of proper supervision can be mentioned as an effective issue in the case of baby L while there is no proper supervision and analysis on the background of the child’s family. The presence of multiple marital relationships increases the mental instability that has happened with the father of baby L as he was in mental trauma due to instability in his mental condition. This situation has happened in the pre-birth condition of baby L when the father was admitted in a “Mental health Assessment”. In addition, both father and mother of baby L had a history of experiencing different legal activities such as ICPC or “Initial Child Protection Conference” and CPP or “Child Protection Plan”. Since, baby L belongs to a critical family background that increases the requirement of proper child protection legal activity.
Apart from baby L, the father had two children in his previous marital relationship where both children had been taken from his shadow by the local authority. During this situation, the father was also legally instructed not to make any contact with his children as there is a presence of domestic abusive incidents with “parental mental health issues”. Hence, it can be said that there was a high chance of facing a huge lack of inter-professional approach while the child was not able to get the opportunity of having comfortable support from the parents. Since, the mental condition and the legal involvement have reduced the possibility of collaborative attitude in both father and mother. According to the explanation of Schotet al. (2020), interprofessional principles indicate the attitude of working together by maintaining similar respect for each other.
In the case of baby l’s parents, there is no possibility of having a collaborative mentality by respecting each other while the mental condition of both was not as well as needed for their child’s health improvement. As per the view of Conroy (2019), the presence of stereotypes in responsibility can be mentioned as a major barrier or issue to achieving interprofessional competencies. Since, it reduces the mental capacity of maintaining a collaborative and suitable working environment. In place of baby L’s parents, this kind of issue has been noticed while they were facing a typical situation of stereotypes due to having several illegal contacts with their previous relations including husband, wife and children. Having some legal restrictions can also be considered as a lack of proper interprofessional approach while sometimes it is possible to face unexpected accidental cases such as baby L’s injury.
In this case, it is important to say that baby L’s health injury is the result of the lack of a proper collaborative approach in parents that reduced their concern for their newborn baby. Furthermore, the impact of the “Local Mental Health Unit ” can also be mentioned as an example of an inter-professional working as it has provided high concern to the protection of baby L rather than thinking about any situational criticality. However, there is a lack of proper supervision and similar concern to the child’s physical and mental well being while the management plan of this unit was only focused on the mental instability of the father instead of thinking about the result of his absence. In this place, the managers of this unit become quite irresponsible for the child’s future wellbeing by being influenced by socialisation. This kind of activity indicates the lack of interprofessional working while it can be mentioned as a socialisation issue of the interprofessional working approach.
The presence of a complex system sometimes affects the stability of the interprofessional working process while it is involved with cultural and social boundaries. In the context of health services, the management system of the LMHU has faced these kinds of barriers during child care services. According to the explanation of Moncataret al. (2021), the lack of interprofessional collaboration can be recognised as a barrier for social workers to serve and handle their social responsibility adequately. Therefore, it can be said that the lack of interprofessional practises in the legal system is capable of negatively impacting children’s protection activities.
Apart from the above incidents, it also has been found that there is a high requirement of involving multi agencies for ensuring a proper child safety and protection plan by considering the child’s ultimate well being. In this case, the maintenance of proper interprofessional acts and rules in “health and safety” management for children is highly required while there is a similar relationship among all participants of a CPP process. In this case, it is necessary to maintain a collaborative culture in child’s protection plan related operations as the lack of this operation progress is quite harmful to the children’s future wellbeing (Skinner et al. 2021).
Furthermore, the involvement of every participant with the presence of similar productivity is important while it helps to achieve great success in children’s protection and safety progress. According to the discussion of Reeves et al. (2018), distinguishing between different types of interprofessional practises has high demand in this current changing environment. Since, the lack of proper practises in the interprofessional working process is capable of reducing the effectiveness of high operational performance levels. In the context of “health and social care” in the case study, there is a high impact of interprofessional collaboration. Since, the involvement of CPP, ICPC and other legal authorities play an effective role in children’s ultimate protection system as an interprofessional collaboration.
The involvement of any kind of social services by considering the legal facts such as maintenance of children’s projection and safety plan requires high concern of maintaining suitable interprofessional collaboration. Since, the lack of proper knowledge and skills regarding interprofessional collaboration is capable of negatively impacting the achievement of any targeted goals (Zechariah et al. 2019). Instead of any proper enquiries, the CSC policy has decided to arrest the parents of baby L due to the reason of unexpected health injuries of baby L. However, this approach of CSC or “Children’s Social Care” has introduced a lack of required interprofessional collaboration. Since, the principles of interprofessional collaboration suggest verifying the original incident without depending on any circumstances as there is a high possibility of having different perspectives of cultural differences (Conrad and Barker, 2020).
Moreover, the pending bail application for the parents of baby L is also capable of harming the future protection stability of baby L and other siblings. Due to this kind of unnecessary legal activities, the children including baby L have been removed from the shadow of their parents which is not suitable for their mental stability. In this case, it is important to understand that the involvement of unnecessary legal actions can harm the future growth of the children instead of protecting them from unethical accidental cases. Social care related authorities are responsible for the maintenance of life-improving processes to ensure a suitable future growth by considering “best knowledge and evidence about what works in practice” (Scie.org.uk, 2021). Protection and improvisation of the justified approach are considered as effective in maintaining sustainable policies in accordance with the protectional analysis and sustainable development in the collaboration teamwork. However, the decision for the children’s parents was not suitable for the future growth of baby L and other siblings as they are too small to understand the actual facts.
In order to produce ultimate support to the children’s protection and safety plan, all involved professionals have been invited for the accomplishment of “Initial Child Protection Conferences” by considering those people who are deeply knowledgeable about the case background circumstances. In addition, the entire child care services have been provided with a presence of high time limitation and possible challenging coincidence. According to Donnelly et al. (2021), the involvement of interprofessional collaboration requires a quality exploration of the actual study before taking any decisions. The maintenance of children’s ultimate protection has been followed by the CSC and CPRS or “Child Protection Reviewing Services” to ensure the management of social service responsibilities.
Conclusion
The above critical analysis of the case study indicates the in-depth concept of interprofessional collaboration which is an important factor in the maintenance of “health and social care” services. In the above section, there is eventual knowledge about the background of the case study by representing the examples and related issues with interprofessional collaboration. Moreover, it can be said that the purpose of this task has been met successfully while the understanding of policies and plan implementation processes regarding the children’s care as a social service has been properly discussed. Furthermore, the progress of ensuring children’s ultimate protection has been described in the above section with a presence of critical analysis in the context of providing a case study.
Reference list
Betancourt, J.R., Green, A.R., Carrillo, J.E., Park, E.R. (2005) Cultural Competence and Health Care Disparities: Key Perspectives and Trends. Health Affairs VOL. 24, NO. 2: RACIAL & ETHNIC DISPARITIES
Bissett, S.M., Preshaw, P.M., Presseau, J. and Rapley, T., (2020). A qualitative study exploring strategies to improve the inter-professional management of diabetes and periodontitis. Primary Care Diabetes, 14(2), pp.126-132.
Conroy, C., (2019). Stereotyping as a major barrier to achievement of Interprofessional education competencies: a narrative literature review. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 17(3), p.8.
Donnelly, S., Ó Coimín, D., O’Donnell, D., NíShé, É., Davies, C., Christophers, L., Mc Donald, S. and Kroll, T., (2021). Assisted decision-making and interprofessional collaboration in the care of older people: a qualitative study exploring perceptions of barriers and facilitators in the acute hospital setting. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 35(6), pp.852-862.
Homeyer, S., Hoffmann, W., Hingst, P., Oppermann, R.F. and Dreier-Wolfgramm, A., (2018). Effects of interprofessional education for medical and nursing students: enablers, barriers and expectations for optimizing future interprofessional collaboration–a qualitative study. BMC nursing, 17(1), pp.1-10.
Moncatar, T.J., Nakamura, K., Siongco, K.L.L., Seino, K., Carlson, R., Canila, C.C., Javier, R.S. and Lorenzo, F.M.E., (2021). Interprofessional collaboration and barriers among health and social workers caring for older adults: a Philippine case study. Human resources for health, 19(1), pp.1-14.
Munro, S., Kornelsen, J. and Grzybowski, S., (2018). Models of maternity care in rural environments: Barriers and attributes of interprofessional collaboration with midwives. Midwifery, 29(6), pp.646-652.
Opele, J.K., Adepoju, K.O. and Adegbite, W.M., (2020). Barriers to Knowledge Management Practices, Interprofessional Collaboration and Information Technology Application in Federal Tertiary Hospitals in Nigeria. Canadian Social Science, 16(12), pp.35-41.
Pecukonis, E., Doyle, O. and Bliss, D.L., (2018). Reducing barriers to interprofessional training: Promoting interprofessional cultural competence. Journal of interprofessional care, 22(4), pp.417-428.
Reeves, S., Xyrichis, A. and Zwarenstein, M., (2018). Teamwork, collaboration, coordination, and networking: Why we need to distinguish between different types of interprofessional practice. Journal of interprofessional care, 32(1), pp.1-3.
Schot, E., Tummers, L. and Noordegraaf, M., (2020). Working on working together. A systematic review on how healthcare professionals contribute to interprofessional collaboration. Journal of interprofessional care, 34(3), pp.332-342.
Scie.org.uk, (2021) About the Social Care Institute for Excellence, Available at: https://www.scie.org.uk/about [Accessed 9th February 2022]
Skinner, K., Simpson, M., Patton, N. and Robson, K., (2021). Enablers and Barriers to Interprofessional Work-Integrated Learning Placements: A Qualitative Study of Rural and Regional Allied Health Supervisors’ Perceptions. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 22(1), pp.83-96.
Xyrichis, A., Reeves, S. and Zwarenstein, M., (2018). Examining the nature of interprofessional practice: An initial framework validation and creation of the InterProfessional Activity Classification Tool (InterPACT). Journal of interprofessional care, 32(4), pp.416-425.
Zechariah, S., Ansa, B.E., Johnson, S.W., Gates, A.M. and Leo, G.D., 2019, December. Interprofessional education and collaboration in healthcare: an exploratory study of the perspectives of medical students in the United States. In Healthcare (Vol. 7, No. 4, p. 117). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Know more about UniqueSubmission’s other writing services:
