Introduction
In the current age of globalization in business, companies such as Kinbee Ltd. have to face the unique challenges and opportunities offered by cultural diversity. As an international company, Kinbee Ltd. is fully aware and appreciative of why and how intercultural business competencies can be a sync for it to derive success within a rapidly changing landscape.
Whether remote working or working from one country to another, the combination of members is often multicultural borrowing from varied people backgrounds. For this reason, according to records, 69% of the executive’s rate diversity and inclusion as an important issue. Besides, teams with different diverse cultural backgrounds have been found to be 35% more likely to outperform their non-diverse counterparts.
The report aims to conduct an in-depth analysis of intercultural dynamics within teams. Kinbee Ltd will be considered as a good case in point due to the very great attention this company focuses on the learning and development of its leaders. The “intercultural issues” that Kinbee Ltd is going to face first is proper management of cultural diversity in teams, which comprise challenges posed to leadership style, communication breakdown, conflicts from pluralism, and cultural sensitivity and understanding. Since Kinbee Ltd is a multicultural firm operating within the global market, it must manage the complexities to bring along cohesiveness, innovation, and prosperity.
Thus, Kinbee Limited should overcome the challenges through implementation strategies such as cultural sensitivity training, conflict resolution workshops, and inclusive team processes, to have profitability connected with the aspect of diversity for sustainable growth and competitiveness.
The following is the rational basis that makes this report emanate as a need by Kinbee Ltd to operate in the complex multicultural environment. As globalization digs its roots towards interconnectedness among people of different cultural standpoints, so should businesses change in paradigms to stay profitable. Understanding how culture may influence leadership style, and communication approaches to conflict in a way that fosters collaboration and attainment of organizational goals.
It finds the unique model of leadership followed by Kinbee Ltd, more or less adapted to continuous learning strategies. The other found aspects like culture shocks affecting human behaviour and intercultural problems are analyzed with the help of relevant theories. Furthermore, the team is going to dig more into the culturally diverse behaviour within the team and the implications revealed by the conflicting values, beliefs, and behaviours.
The final section provides the recommendations of the reports on acculturation strategies based on the needs at Kinbee Ltd, how cultural synergy can be fostered in the organization, how leadership can be advanced, stereotypes deconstructed, and how power managed. Such recommendations are bound to the theoretical framework and have empirical evidence and hence suggest possible action toward increased collaboration and improved performance at Kinbee Ltd. By paying further attention to the dynamics of interculturalism and effective strategies, Kinbee Ltd will manage to nurture a culture of non-exclusion, respect, and innovation to tap into its potential for long-term growth and competitiveness in the global market.
3. Findings
Kinbee Ltd is a multicultural company to be discussed in this report are various aspects of intercultural business competencies touching on leadership, culture shock, intercultural theories, culturally diverse behaviour, conflicting values, beliefs, behaviours, and acculturation strategies (Ward et al. 2020).
Kinbee Ltd is a company currently dealing with trading activities and is registered under the incorporation date of 24 February 2017. The registered office, along with its active office, is based in “Cardiff, South Glamorgan”, 7 Restways Close, Cardiff, CF5 2SB (Kinbee.co.uk, 2024).
Figure 1: Net Assets
(Source: Kinbee.co.uk, 2024)
Here are some key details about Kinbee Ltd:
Company Number: 10637763
Company Type: “Private Limited Company with Share Capital”
Size: Micro (“Less than 10 employees or under £2 million turnover”)
Classification: “Other business support service activities n.e.c.” (82990)
Status: Active
Last Accounts Submitted: “For the period ending on February 28, 2023” (Endole.co.uk, 2024)
Next Accounts Due: November 30, 2024
Last “Confirmation Statement Submitted”: February 28, 2023
“Next Confirmation Statement Due”: March 13, 2024
The company focuses on leadership learning and development strategies. It offers a variety of courses, programs and one-to-one training for the possibility to add more impact and develop an effective strategy.
The last accounts of the company are made up to 28 February 2023 and the next is due by 30 November 2024 (Gov.uk, 2024). The company has no previous names and also it does not have any mortgage charges, outstanding or satisfied.
Kinbee Ltd’s Leadership Method
Kinbee Ltd is not any other company, but rather one that stands out distinctively to display a unique model of leadership related to learning and development strategies (Sobkowiak, 2021).
Learning and Development Strategies
Kinbee Ltd helps to ensure that its leaders face continuous learning and development. A cascade of courses, programs, and one-on-one training will allow the leader to fulfil more impact and be successful in tactics (Vasyl Taras et al. 2021). They are really committed to ensuring that their leaders gain professional competence, and resilience, and practice best practices.
Co-Production of Aspirational Strategies
Kinbee Ltd works in coproduction with clients, shaping learning and development strategies that are simply aspirational (Pratiwi, & Sari, 2022). The mechanisms for co-production serve to shape both the quality and practice standards that will become more sensitive and responsive to individual needs and ambitions.
Empowering Talent Development
Kinbee Ltd is committed to the unlocking of talent development for success and growth. The company identified the most valuable commodities and competitive advantages for its clients as knowledge, insight, and expertise. Kinbee Ltd works together with its clients so that they can implement excellence and explore what a culture of learning will look like for them.
“Excellence and Elevation Framework”
Kinbee Ltd has developed an “Excellence and Elevation framework” for these varied concepts. A structured approach by professional improvement of teams in organizations provides a ladder of high-value inspired learning activities which assist in building skills, resilience, and excellence (Agha, & Tayşir, 2021).
3.1 Culture Shock and Its Impact on Human Behaviour
“Culture shock” is a sense of disorientation and distress due to adaptation to a new culture or the one people relocate to. This can be perplexing, anxious, and even frustrating due to having to adjust to new forms of patterns of thought and expression. That affects “human behaviour” in that it causes human beings to question their appropriateness and to change their behaviour to embrace the given culture. This can also result in friction between people as they deal with differences in speech, social customs, and expectations (Shang, 2022).
Figure 2: 5 Stages of Cultural Shock
(Source: Shang, 2022)
“Culture shock” can significantly impact human behaviour in various ways:
Communication Breakdown: Differences in styles of communication from non-verbal signals to language barriers can create confusion and wrong communication.
Emotional distress: Isolation, frustration, anxiety, and homesickness are some of the emotional distresses experienced when experiencing culture shock. In return, this affects an individual’s mental health and productivity.
Adjustment challenges: Adjusting to new cultural values, social customs, and work procedures is among the hardest challenges.
Ethnocentrism and Stereotyping: The culture shock should not agitate the already existing ethnocentric attitudes and stereotypes that are in the minds of people thereby contributing to bias, prejudice and discrimination based on certain grounds such as race These drops in performance happen directly because of cultural shock, it influences job performance and interpersonal relations (Shang, 2022). As a result of culture shock, an expatriate loses motivation, confidence, and job satisfaction.
Physical symptoms: The general illnesses of exhaustion, headaches, and sleeping disorders erupt in a person due to culture shock, where potentially general health problems might follow.
3.2 Analyzing Intercultural Problems Through Relevant Theories
In order for this analysis to be successful, it is pertinent to invest in diverse dimensions of strategies and resources with the touch of relevant theories for an intensive, effective bid to handle intercultural problems at hand (Ashikali et al. 2021). This will entail such things as diverse cultural leadership styles, deconstruction of stereotypes, and attribution and poor power skills. Here is how such aspect should be used:
“Leadership Styles and Cultural Variations”:
Leadership has various dimensions and cultures from autocratic to participative forms of leadership, from lordship to servant leadership. For example, leadership among the “Japanese leadership” characteristics such as humility and a spirit of service to subordinates, overturn the conventional norms of hierarchy (Gerlach, & Eriksson, 2021). Understanding these differences would help one succeed in issues to do with leadership in cases of multicultural settings.
“Stereotyping and Attribution”:
An alert thought towards exorcising uncalled stereotypes and attributions is important to overcome one’s biases and prejudices (Cioarță, 2020). The realization that stereotypes usually stand on oversimplified and judgmental assumptions at best assures one of better placement in challenging his preconceived notions. The difference between internal and external attributions will help them to clear out their doubts in regard to action attributions and hence, nurture empathic and collaborative cross-cultural relations.
“Types of Power in Organizations”:
This knowledge of the variant of power forms and their operation – that is, legitimate, expert, coercive, and referent – offers insight into the working out of influence in an organization. As such, effective leaders will be in a position to figure out appropriate forms of power they would exert in their distinctive leadership style and the context of the organization to motivate and lead people effectively (Kleinewiese, 2022). It will also be a mitigating factor to know that power can be exercised without formal authority, therefore reducing the misleading factor underpinning leadership dynamics in multicultural settings.
“Cultural Worldviews and Belief Systems”:
Embedded in such heritage and belief systems, such as those associated with Hinduism, are very important pieces that serve as critical insights toward basic values and norms of behaviour and decision-making (Gamsakhurdia, 2022). As beliefs, attitudes, and behaviour are all connected within the various folds of culture, individuals get to negotiate intercultural interaction better and more sensitively.
In summary, highlighting the analysis of intercultural problems through relevant theories narrows to actual leadership styles, stereotypes, power imbalances, and cultural worldviews. A strategy that integrates the many theories may give individuals better insight into the cross-cultural dynamic and thus allow the devising of better, more clearly culturally sensitive solutions for complex problems.
3.3 Analysis of Culturally Diverse Behavior within the Team Context
Taking into account all at stake, in this regard, for instance, a study into culturally diverse behaviour in a team context was indeed replete with complexity and channelled challenges. For example, from “Trompenaars and Hapden-Turner’s” work on the notion of managing people across cultures to Goncalves’s discussion of leadership styles and power relations as well as insights on stereotyping, attribution, and cultural intelligence.
“Cultural Dimensions and Behavior”: “Trompenaars and Hampden-Turner” discuss how cultural dimensions can influence behaviour in teams (Zimmermann et al. 2020). The differences in individualism-collectivism, power distance, and uncertainty avoidance show how members of a team will perceive their roles “face to face” and how they will interrelate with each other. Significant cultural influences are shown in different dimensions for communications, decision-making, and conflict resolution in teams.
“Leadership Styles Across Cultures”: This is tied up with how culture is expressed in leadership style. For instance, at the contextual level, two cultures might hypothetically have been found to respect or favour authoritative or participative leadership styles, respectively, each influencing group dynamics. Appreciating and working with this leaning toward cultural preference in leadership will improve team synergy and performance.
“Stereotyping and Attribution”: In connection to this, inclusion for diversity in a culturally diverse team is made possible through the addressing of unwarranted stereotypes and attributions, which characterizes challenging supposed stereotypes and making fine attributions from the perspective of individual behaviours instead of cultural generalizations. Such conformities accord with the focus by “Thomas and Inkson” to deconstruct stereotypes in an attempt to enhance cross-bound collaborations (Sue et al. 2022).
“Power Dynamics and Influence”: Power and influence in a team are also subject to team dynamics. The leader power-walks many sensitivities, from legitimate and expert power to referent and charismatic influence. By recognizing and using the various forms of power, these leaders can themselves back more of a team environment in which convicted dialogue is allowed and valued by the team members.
“Cultural Intelligence and Mindful Engagement”: The other way that could be functional in managing “cross-cultural teams” effectively is the development of cultural intelligence through mindful engagement. All these, like active listening, empathizing, and readiness to adapt in terms of cultural differences, surely help leaders in not only bridging a gap but also bringing about an inclusive culture in teams. This fits hand in glove with the theme of mindful monitoring and regulation of the lecture material.
Other skilful, culturally appropriate behaviours related to the team exhibited the play of the power dynamics, styles of leadership, and intercultural competence through which cultural dimensions have shown to be often very tricky. Therefore, culturally responsive behaviours in the challenging of stereotypes and use of cultural intelligence can be seen to follow the embracing of cultural diversity in all aspects of the differences of the people; hence, instrumental access towards a wealth of cultural differences for use in collaboration, innovation, and success in the present global workplace.
3.4 Understanding of Conflicting Values, Beliefs, and Behaviors
Different leadership styles exist, each with its own set of values, beliefs, and behaviours.
It is like “authoritarian leadership” itself, for most of the instances, runs with participative or transformational leadership for that matter since at the
“Conflicts” may continue to go on amongst the leaders of the organization having different styles or may try to impose their preferred style without taking into consideration the elements of culture or context.
Conflicting Values:
“Individualism vs. Collectivism”: Western culture calls for the independence of individuals with personal success, whereas Eastern culture places importance on harmony and concord within groups (Bonomi et al. 2021).
“Hierarchy vs. Egalitarianism”: In some cultural contents, the emphasis is a hierarchy, in which one respects authorities respectively and takes orders, while in others quite take egalitarian directions, in which power is quite evenly distributed between the people.
“Power Distance”: From culture to culture, the perceptions of the equal or unequal distribution of power differ. Even in some societies, it is expected, accepted, and, further, approved that power is unequally distributed. In other societies, people constantly strive for equalization between members.
Conflicting Beliefs:
“Stereotyping and Attribution”: This trait is internalized as the cause of individual behaviour in Western culture, while in other cultures, it is focused on social or situational causes.
“Sense of Humor”: An example by which cultural beliefs may be contradictory is the sense of humour, for example, what constitutes humour and the way humour should be expressed, such as the belief that Germans with no sense of humour against the universality belief in humour (Yoo, 2021).
“Spiritual Beliefs”: Spiritual beliefs can be diverse and cover many different arenas: monotheistic religions, pantheistic tendencies, or even animistic views have always distinguished the contrasts from one culture to another in the world. At many junctures, friction is developed due to the beliefs, for example, the belief in material success at the cost of spiritual guidance.
Conflicting Behaviors:
“Leadership Styles”: Different leadership styles may show conflicting behaviours between the authoritative style against the participative or servant leadership style. Some cultures will demand their leaders instantiate strength in their subordinates, while others would have a culture that expects leaders to allow for collaboration while empowering their subordinates.
“Expression of Power”: Conflicts may arise concerning the expression and perception of power. For example, some cultures may be more inclined towards the existence and dominance of coercive forms of power, so organizational members would be motivated purely out of fear, while other cultures may cherish referent or charismatic forms of power.
“Interpersonal Communication”: The behaviors related to what styles of communication are appropriate, and what is appropriate, can vary dramatically with cultural differences. Some cultures value direct communication, while others view indirect, or even using contextually sensitive communication, as quite critical to maintain harmony and not cause affront.
3.5 Acculturation Strategies
Here are some acculturation strategies that Kinbee Ltd could consider:
Cultural Synergy Building:
Encourage cooperation and collaboration among employees from different cultural backgrounds to foster synergy.
Promote understanding and appreciation of each other’s cultural perspectives and values.
Create opportunities for cross-cultural teamwork and problem-solving.
Leadership Development:
Offer training programs that focus on developing cultural intelligence and leadership skills across different cultural contexts.
Implement mentorship programs where leaders from diverse cultural backgrounds can guide and support each other.
Emphasize the importance of mindful attention, monitoring, and regulation in leadership practices across cultures.
Deconstructing Unwarranted Stereotypes:
Provide education and training sessions to help employees recognize and challenge stereotypes.
Encourage open dialogue and sharing of personal experiences to break down misconceptions and prejudices.
It will contribute to sponsoring a culture of respect and inclusion, in which each person is valued for his or her unique contribution, regardless of their cultural background.
Management Power and Influence:
Empower leaders with different ways and means to influence others in the desired manner, such as legitimate, expert, referent, and informational power.
Emphasize the importance of using power responsibly and ethically to build trust and collaboration (Yoo, 2021).
Encourage leaders to lead by example, demonstrating integrity, empathy, and cultural sensitivity in their interactions.
Promoting Cultural Understanding:
Offer cultural competency training to employees at all levels of the organization.
Language classes, Cultural workshops, Team building activities
Encourage the employees they consider learning more about the cultural backgrounds and practices of other people building mutual understanding and respect.
4. Conclusions
Assimilating the analysis conducted on Kinbee Ltd. in terms of intercultural business competencies was altogether a brilliant comprehension of the leadership strategies, cultural shock imparted by the aspect, intercultural theories, and value of conflict. The following are, therefore, recommended: cultural sensitivity training and conflict resolution workshops, inculcating in them leadership instruction and processes, inclusive team processes, ethical approaches, diversity policies, feedback mechanisms, fair mechanisms of hiring and team-building activities, and language training. These strategies will aim to create an environment of respect, understanding, and cooperation for employees of diversified cultural backgrounds, which eventually leads to team cooperation and performance. All these recommendations thus concerning whatever Kinbee Ltd needs to do to create an inclusive and productive working environment critical to the attainment of organizational growth and success.
5. Recommendations
Based on the foregoing analysis and conclusions, the following are recommended for improving team collaboration and performance at Kinbee Ltd:
Cultural Sensitivity Training: The management should take the initiative of organizing regular cultural sensitivity training for team members. The latter will be able to understand and easily take note of the respect made to different cultures in teams and hence avoid conflicts that arise from such misunderstandings (Young, & Guo, 2020).
Conflict Resolution Workshops: Carrying out workshops on conflict resolution, where possible (Raewf, & Mahmood, 2021). The workshops should demonstrate the various styles of conflict resolution by use of tools like the “Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI)” so that proper reconciliation can be affected to meet diverse views and opinions from all stakeholders.
Leadership Development: Advance their leadership development programs, ensuring that they progress even more empathetic and open-minded leaders in efficient communication strategies, handling the intercultural dynamics, and nurturing an inclusivity environment since leaders hold key positions (Liu et al. 2021).
Inclusive Team Processes: Examine and modify the functionality of every team so that they are more culturally inclusive and sensitive. It may take the form of improved communication practices and changes in decision-making processes and feedback mechanisms (Tomioka et al. 2022).
Ethical and Empathetic Approaches: Promote ethical and empathetic relations in every interaction among team members, noting that all members come from diverse perspectives with valuable contributions (Bernstein et al. 2020). Therefore, the above should help in growing a culture of mutual respect and understanding.
Diversity and Inclusion Policies: Set down policies of diversity and inclusion in clear words. This should encompass non-discrimination policies, equal opportunity policies, and how to communicate respectfully (Rose et al. 2021). Every member of the team should be aware of these policies and they must be observed in their true spirit.
Feedback Mechanisms: Implementation mechanisms include regular feedback given on the dynamics within the team through team meetings, anonymous suggestion boxes, and one-to-one meetings with the respective team leaders for those who prefer it. Ensure that this feedback is acted upon constantly to implement improvements in the competencies.
Hiring Practices: Check the practices in the hiring process for equality and the absence of discrimination against diverse people. For example, some of the training that may be provided to hiring managers could include such areas as unconscious bias or the execution of structured job-related competencies interviews (Goldberg, & Warburton, 2021).
Team Building Activities: Different types of teams building activities that promote unity, cooperation, and understanding can include problem-solving tasks, off-duty day trips, and all other kinds of collaborative projects. Plan with regard to the broad cultural diversity that exists among your employees.
Language Training: Offer language training to the team, especially if it is a different member of people speaking diverse languages. This may serve to enhance effective communication and at the same time show respect for the diverse languages their team members speak.
These recommendations bear relevancy within the frame of course learning and are based on the analysis and conclusions conducted earlier. These findings may be adaptable to Kinbee Ltd in its quest to improve its team’s cooperation and performance so that the organization may be productive.
6. References
Agha, O. M., & Tayşir, N. K. (2021). Reverse Culture Shock among International Business Administration Exchange Students. International Journal of Commerce and Finance, 7(2), 71-100. Retrieved from: http://ijcf.ticaret.edu.tr/index.php/ijcf/article/download/274/221 [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Ashikali, T., Groeneveld, S., & Kuipers, B. (2021). The role of inclusive leadership in supporting an inclusive climate in diverse public sector teams. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(3), 497-519. Retrieved from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0734371X19899722 [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Bernstein, R. S., Bulger, M., Salipante, P., & Weisinger, J. Y. (2020). From diversity to inclusion to equity: A theory of generative interactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 167, 395-410. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04180-1 [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Bonomi, G., Gennaioli, N., & Tabellini, G. (2021). Identity, beliefs, and political conflict. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(4), 2371-2411. Retrieved from: https://academic.oup.com/qje/article/136/4/2371/6368349?login=true [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Cioarță, I. (2020). Dealing with Conflicts in Social Work–A Discussion on Thomas-Kilmann Model Applicability in Social Work. Revista de Asistenţă Socială, 19(2), 33-44. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ionut-Cioarta/publication/376782039_Dealing_with_Conflicts_in_Social_Work_-_A_Discussion_on_Thomas-Kilmann_Model_Applicability_in_Social_Work/links/6586e5bb0bb2c7472b080c0c/Dealing-with-Conflicts-in-Social-Work-A-Discussion-on-Thomas-Kilmann-Model-Applicability-in-Social-Work.pdf [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Endole.co.uk, 2024. Kinbee Ltd – Company Profile. Retrieved from: https://suite.endole.co.uk/insight/company/10637763-kinbee-ltd [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Gamsakhurdia, V. L. (2022). Critical Consideration of Theoretical Features of Major Bidimensional Models of Acculturation. In A Theory of Proculturation: Development of the self through intercultural communication (pp. 31-47). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-06301-5_3 [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Gerlach, P., & Eriksson, K. (2021). Measuring cultural dimensions: external validity and internal consistency of Hofstede’s VSM 2013 Scales. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 662604. Retrieved from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662604/full [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Goldberg, E. M., & Warburton, R. W. (2021). Ends and Means in Social Work: the development and outcome of a case review system for social workers. Routledge. Retrieved from: https://books.google.com/ [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Gov.uk, 2024. KINBEE LTD filing history – Find and update company information – GOV.UK. Retrieved from: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10637763/filing-history [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Kinbee.co.uk, 2024. Kinbee | Learning and development strategies for leaders. Retrieved from: https://kinbee.co.uk/ [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Kleinewiese, J. (2022). Ethnic discrimination in neighborhood ingroup-outgroup encounters: Reducing threat-perception and increasing fairness as possible solutions. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 4, 1038252. Retrieved from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fhumd.2022.1038252/full [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Liu, Z., Venkatesh, S., Murphy, S. E., & Riggio, R. E. (2021). Leader development across the lifespan: A dynamic experiences-grounded approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(5), 101382. Retrieved from: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vrplZ6nMiHvTkG4Qm1WDGcYiiZojMWj3/view [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Pratiwi, N. I., & Sari, K. T. N. (2022, November). An Analysis of Anxiety Management for Foreigners During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Southern Bali based on Intercultural Communication Perspective. In Proceedings Of International Conference On Communication Science (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 417-426). Retrieved from: https://proceeding.unram.ac.id/index.php/iccs/article/download/79/71 [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Raewf, M. B., & Mahmood, Y. N. (2021). The cultural diversity in the workplace. Cihan University-Erbil Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(1), 1-6. Retrieved from: https://journals.cihanuniversity.edu.iq/index.php/cuejhss/article/download/220/160 [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Rose, H., McKinley, J., & Galloway, N. (2021). Global Englishes and language teaching: A review of pedagogical research. Language Teaching, 54(2), 157-189. Retrieved from: https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/225713/3/225713.pdf [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Shang, Y. (2022, December). The Cultural Adaptation Process of Chinese International Students in the United States. In 2022 6th International Seminar on Education, Management and Social Sciences (ISEMSS 2022) (pp. 3409-3417). Atlantis Press. Retrieved from: https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125982044.pdf [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Sobkowiak, P. (2021). Developing intercultural identity on a sojourn abroad: A case study. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 56(1), 149-179. Retrieved from: https://sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/stap-2021-0029 [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Sue, D. W., Sue, D., Neville, H. A., & Smith, L. (2022). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from: https://ghnet.guelphhumber.ca/files/course_outlines/FCSS%203040_Mark_Macdonald.approved.pdf [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Tomioka, J., Horiguchi, R., Yamauchi, K., Takatani, S., Yokota, S., Nogimoto, E., … & Shimazawa, K. (2023). Report on Academic Exchange Partner Universities’ Short‒term International Student Exchange Programs: Faculty of Nursing, Chiang Mai University. Journal of Otemae University Institute of Global Nursing (JIGN), 5(Suppl.), 41-47. Retrieved from: https://otemae.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_action_common_download&item_id=2355&item_no=1&attribute_id=22&file_no=1 [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Vasyl Taras, Dan Baack, Dan Caprar, Alfredo Jiménez, & Fabian Froese. (2021). Research: How Cultural Differences Can Impact Global Teams. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2021/06/research-how-cultural-differences-can-impact-global-teams [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Ward, C., Bochner, S., & Furnham, A. (2020). Psychology culture shock. Routledge. Retrieved from: https://perpus.univpancasila.ac.id/repository/EBUPT181257.pdf [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Yoo, C. (2021). Acculturation strategies of multi-cultural family adolescents in South Korea: marginalization, separation, assimilation, and integration. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 81, 9-19. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176721000031 [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Young, S., & Guo, K. L. (2020). Cultural diversity training: the necessity of cultural competence for health care providers and in nursing practice. The health care manager, 39(2), 100-108. Retrieved from: https://dspace.lib.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10790/2987/1/guo.k-2016-0010.pdf [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Zimmermann, A., McQuinn, B., & Macdonald, D. W. (2020). Levels of conflict over wildlife: Understanding and addressing the right problem. Conservation Science and Practice, 2(10), e259. Retrieved from: https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/csp2.259 [Retrieved on: 03.03.2024]
Know more about UniqueSubmission’s other writing services:
