MMB726815 Advancing Professional Practice Assignment Sample
Introduction
It is estimated that Allied Health Professionals (AHPs) account for about one-third of the workforce in the healthcare industry, and they have a great opportunity to enhance services via the conduct of research and the use of research-informed practice. While these professional organizations have not had a long history of study that has been incorporated into their work, they have a strong interest in continuing along this path of investigation. An increase in the number of cases on clinical caseloads, a lack of long-term training, and concomitant loss of trust in practitioners’ competence are all obstacles that must be addressed if this endeavor is to be successful (Melariri,2021). An investigation conducted recently discovered that medical practice administrators are ill-equipped to supervise and steer the growth of staff research efforts inside their organizations. (Timovski2021) Nowadays, the delivery of healthcare takes place in a multidisciplinary setting that is tailored to the unique requirements of each and every patient who seeks it. Unified research knowledge and abilities across all AHP disciplines, as well as a common language across all AHP disciplines, may make the process of designing and constructing clinical career tracks easier to manage and understand for everyone involved. To support AHPs in the planning and leading of research activities throughout their professional lifetimes, we’re building tools to assist them in their continuous efforts to establish a common research framework that will be utilized by all researchers throughout their careers (Timovski,2021).
Critically analyze and evaluate your personal learning and professional development as a qualified AHP.
Patients’ and communities’ health can be dramatically improved through the research of Allied Health Professionals (AHPs), who make up a significant proportion of the global healthcare workforce (Hearle,2019). Their research has the potential to significantly improve the quality of patient and community health while also increasing the efficiency of healthcare delivery. AHPs make up about one-third of the health and social care workforce in the United Kingdom [2, with more than 65,500 trained professionals registered with the National Health Service as of 2018 and are responsible for providing direct patient care. Professionals who work in the field of allied health care (Allied Health Professionals, or AHPs) in the United Kingdom are a diverse collection of 14 distinct professions that combine to provide a comprehensive range of services to the general public. The rehabilitation field employs a diverse range of professionals, including physiotherapists, occupational therapists, radiologists, emergency medical technicians, speech and language pathologists, podiatrists, dietitians, operating room practitioners, orthoptists, osteopaths, prosthetists, and orthotists, just to name a few examples. Art therapists, music therapists, and dancers are some of the other specialists that work in this sector. Even if each of these professions has a distinct scope of practise, there is no reason why they cannot work together to provide comprehensive care in the areas of prevention and health promotion, diagnosis and treatment of patients, and the development of independent living . The ability of AHPs to make a positive impact in people’s lives while also improving the health and well-being of our ageing and changing population is unrivalled, regardless of whether they work in the public, private, or non-profit sectors.
For vocation and professional position, there are a variety of ideal-types that reflect a diversity of coping mechanisms. These ideal-types include the treater, the consultant, the doubter, and the inventor, among others. For the sake of simplicity, all ideal-types are shown as female, despite the fact that each ideal-type is comprised of an equal number of female and male physiotherapists in each category. Despite the fact that she is characterised as prioritising patient care and believing that she is responsible for caring and service-giving via physiotherapy, she is also described as acting in her own self-interest while treating patients, according to the author. When compared to a treatment provider, the consultant is distinguished by his or her desire to serve as an advisor and specialist in physiotherapy rather than as a treatment provider in a non-hierarchical environment with extensive expertise rather than functioning as a treatment provider Despite the fact that it is believed that combining patient treatment and research would expand professional knowledge in addition to clinical practise, which is a trademark of the doubter, patient care is given priority over research. Innovators have certain traits that distinguish them when it comes to partnering with management, research, and treatment. One of these characteristics is a strong resolve to interact with them in order to boost both patient work and professional autonomy.
Ability to show evidence-informed practise is an essential component of all allied health professions , and it is also a critical component of pre-registration training for all allied health professions. In order to support the adoption of evidence-informed practise, a broad variety of programmes have been put in place, and professional AHP researchers have the potential to have a significant influence at all levels of health and social care. It has been demonstrated that patient satisfaction is higher in organisations that engage in high-quality, person-centered research activities, mortality rates are lower, quality performance is improved, and organisational efficiency is improved in organisations that engage in high-quality, person-centered research activities. Also established is that patient satisfaction is better in organisations that participate in high-quality, person-centered research activities than in organisations that do not. Strong research cultures at the departmental level have been shown to be associated with lower staff turnover and faster translation of knowledge into practise , both of which have the potential to improve patient outcomes and satisfaction while simultaneously increasing resource efficiency . Individual practitioners, on the other hand, have stated that they are motivated by a personal interest in the topic, improved job satisfaction and career advancement, recognition and professional kudos, increased awareness of research findings, and the satisfaction of seeing an impact on practise when asked about their motivations for participating in research. AHPs Strategy 2018–2020 states that realising the research potential of AHPs is critical to achieving the National Institute for Health Research’s mission, which is “to provide a health research system in which the NHS supports outstanding individuals working in world-class facilities, conducting leading-edge research focused on the needs of patients and the general public.” As previously stated, the policies and programmes of the World Health Organization, as well as National Health and Social Care Policies and Programs, as well as those of individual nations, are consistent with this.
How do you value professional development for AHP practice? How does it contribute to the generation of the AHP professions’ knowledge base?
In the words of the National Science Foundation, “research capacity development” is “a process of individual and institutional improvement that culminates in improved levels of skills and a better ability to do relevant research” ( , p. 1322). It is critical to improve the research abilities of frontline health and social care practitioners in order to promote a healthy research culture that adds value and meaning to the lives of patients and the general public. In accordance with the statement on page 56 of , the objective of this approach within the framework of allied health is “to enable higher-quality practise and continued advancement for all members of the profession in general,” with the goal of “strengthening existing practitioner skill with complementary research.” Over the course of many decades, significant efforts by allied health professionals have resulted in the development of research competences and research cultures across their organisations. The industry continues to develop at an alarming pace, despite the fact that a number of roadblocks have been identified in the establishment of a healthy research culture within this sector.
Allied health professionals’ lack of confidence in their research abilities has been identified as a key barrier to the development of a healthy research culture among them, according to a recent thorough study by Borkowski and colleagues . For the most part, AHPs feel that their knowledge and abilities are inadequate, and they believe that possibilities for continuing learning and advancement via research are insufficient for practising physicians. [Some practitioners are concerned about a high level of workload, a lack of time and money to devote to research efforts, and inconsistency in management assistance, among other things. As a result, in the allied health industry, management levels of research literacy vary, rendering them unqualified to guide staff through the process of creating their own research projects or referring them to qualified clinical academics. Similarly, individual managers in the allied health business are ill-prepared to send personnel to clinical academics who have extensive knowledge in their specialties. A greater amount of assistance is required to guarantee that all individual practitioners continue to enhance their research abilities, as well as for allied health leaders to monitor and encourage the research talents of those working within their own organisations.
personal and professional development
Despite the fact that allied health disciplines provided training and advice for continuous professional development, the range and depth of research information and skills provided by different disciplines varied, as did the terminology used to identify similar areas. When it comes to clinical and applied research, multi-disciplinary techniques are increasingly being adopted; and the same standards, regulatory requirements, and duties are becoming more applicable to all researchers, regardless of their professional background. Because of the potential convergence and divergence in recommendations made by multiple professional organisations , it may be difficult to recruit researchers who are appropriately prepared and competent in their fields of expertise. According to reports, AHPs who are trying to adapt study results to their own practises find the language used to refer to research conducted inside academic institutions to be worrisome (Lead,2021) [For further details, please see the corresponding article. It is recommended that in order to establish a successful AHP research culture, a standard framework that is acceptable to AHPs practising in all relevant health and social care systems, as well as a set of key research skills, knowledge, and abilities that can be shared across all professions, be developed (Cheah,2022).
Where do you currently stand with regard to the level of practice?
It is the responsibility of this organisation to promote and expand research capacity and competency across the United Kingdom . It is comprised of a strategy committee, regional hubs throughout the United Kingdom representing 13 AHP member professions, as well as an administrative central office. Cahpr (Collaborative for Allied Health Professions Research) is comprised of an administrative central office and regional hubs throughout the United Kingdom. The California Association for Health Promotion and Research (CAHPR) seeks proportional donations from each professional organisation with which it partners in order to support its activities.
The development of AHP research, the strengthening of evidence of the profession’s value and impact on improving service user and community care, and the facilitation of the professions’ ability to speak with a single voice on research issues are all goals of the American Health Professionals Association, which is based in Washington, DC.
It is the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NIHR), which is situated in the United Kingdom and promotes inter-professional interactions in the fields of health, public health, and higher education that are encouraged. According to the mission statement of the National Institute for Health Research Clinical Leadership and Academic Health Research Centre Yorkshire and Humber, the center’s goal is to improve patient outcomes through applied health research, put findings into practise, and increase research capacity and engagement in NHS organisations (Leone,2021). The mission statement of the National Institute for Health Research Clinical Leadership and Academic Health Research Centre Yorkshire and Humber can be found here. The mission statement for the centre, which is based in Leeds, may be read on the organization’s official website. The identification of a local and national need that culminated in the execution of the project in question created the chance for a secondment opportunity to become available. It was made possible via a cooperation between the CAHPR Yorkshire and South Yorkshire regional hub and the CLAHRC Yorkshire and Humber, which is part of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, that secondment possibilities could be made available. (Burkinshaw, 2018)
judgements with illustrative evidence?
The sum of information and abilities (knowledge combined with skills combined with values combined with behaviours combined with traits) that allows members to function safely, effectively, and legally within their specific scope of practise at any given time is referred to as comprehension in the context of a particular profession. The ability to recognise the limitations of one’s own practise as well as those of the profession as a whole, as well as the ability to engage in personalised, organised, career-long learning to meet recognised development needs throughout one’s professional life, are vital. Members are obliged to participate in tailored, organised, and career-long learning activities in order to meet their set development objectives.
As a member progresses through the levels of the organisation, their level of proficiency changes. Certain disciplines grow more developed as a result of experience, whilst others become less developed or perhaps disappear entirely as a result of that experience. The term “scope of practise” relates not to a member’s overall scope of practise in the United Kingdom, but rather to a member’s specific scope of practise at any one moment within the general scope of physiotherapy practise in the nation. Members’ competence cannot be stated or prescribed in a straightforward or prescriptive manner owing to the fact that it is unique and always expanding and developing.
Members who participate in continuous professional development [CPD] have a better probability of maintaining and enhancing their talents. A process in which members’ learning and development needs are identified, members pursue learning to address these needs, and then members apply their new learning in the context of their physiotherapy activity as a result of this process of reflection, planning, and evaluation, according to the CSP, should serve as the foundation for members’ continuing professional development.
The statutory regulating body requires practice-qualified members to retain their HPC registration by satisfying the standards for continuous professional development (CPD) set out by the statutory regulatory body.
strengths and weaknesses in relation to your professional development
When determining whether research knowledge, skills, or behaviour were applicable in allied health or social care settings or in the context of non-medical health professionals in order to answer the research question, JH, JC, and KG considered how research knowledge, skills, or behaviour could be applied in allied health or social care settings or in the context of non-medical health professionals in order to answer the research question. JH, JC, and KG considered how research knowledge, skills, or behaviour could be applied in allied health Due to time restrictions, it was agreed that the scope of phase one dialogues would be restricted in order to accommodate these limits. Only those organisations were invited who would be able to communicate with each other within the time constraints that had been set. It has been taken into consideration the saturation of statements in circumstances when there has been a substantial amount of overlap or repetition, or when there has been a lack of clearly defined ideas, topics, or themes, among other things (Vaughan,2021).
A framework analysis was undertaken on the participants who had been found as a consequence of the first phase’s selection approach in order to locate relevant topics that may be utilised to pursue research in the domain of allied health generally. The Framework Method was updated by Gale and colleagues to allow for the comparison and contrast of data across a large number of instances (AHPRFs) while still preserving clearly described methods and conclusions.
Using an analytical framework devised by the Royal Pharmaceutical Society and based on the Royal Pharmaceutical Society Research, Evidence Evaluation Toolkit, AHPRFs were collected and deductively coded after participants had become acquainted with the AHPRFs. It was found that category heads from the REET framework were the “best fit” when it comes to systematic categorization and comparison of coded data in a very straightforward fashion. It covered a wide range of topics, including research skills and methods; research knowledge; intellectual ability and personal qualities; research management and leadership; communication and dissemination of research; working with others; collaborating in research; the impact of research; scientific evaluation; research translation; and many other topics. When the instrument was originally tested, physicians commented that it was straightforward and uncomplicated to use , and this was substantiated by later testing. As part of the research aim, JH was in charge of the first coding and categorization in order to establish an acceptable analytical framework. In order to guarantee data comparability, JC coded around 20 percent of the data on an individual basis, with the remaining 80 percent of the data being entered in line with the group’s collective agreement. As a result, in order to make clearer sense of the codes, they were split into categories. Both JC and KG completed their own individual examination of the data with the purpose of uncovering new patterns, accounting for outlying codes, and presenting a variety of viewpoints on the quality of the data, as well as redundancy and duplication, among other things. The conclusions of these investigations were released in a separate report. As far as structuring the data was concerned, JH relied on the Microsoft Excel spreadsheet tool to help him. Over the course of the study, a number of developing themes were uncovered, which contributed to define the analytic framework in its subsequent incarnations.
the identification and justification of a professional development plan which highlights your priority learning needs
Physiotherapists, on the other hand, believe that the profession’s aims are neither well defined nor obvious in their nature. They consider physiotherapy to be a job that is both inventive and diversified in its application. In light of the fact that occupational area has such a deep impact on physiotherapists’ work and that professional position, on the other hand, has such a minimal impact on that job, it is apparent that each physiotherapist must be prepared to perform a professionally defined function with a wide scope. According to this picture, the professional culture of physiotherapy is derived from the physiotherapist’s role as a “doer,” or as a person who provides treatment to others. It is really the most important single vocational role that a person may do, and it is patient care. Physiotherapists’ commitment to therapy varies significantly around the world, with the most significant disparities seen in the United States, where they devote a disproportionate amount of time to their patients. It does not seem that any single professional work assignment that is equivalent in breadth and complexity to it has been substituted for a minor pro element of therapy so far as is known. On the contrary, it seems as if the job of the physiotherapist is becoming more diverse.
Recommendation
Every one of those ideal-types may be understood as stemming from a sense of connection with and responsibility to meet the interests and needs of other people, which can be seen as a source of inspiration in and of itself. Achieving these aims, according to physiotherapists, is divided into two categories: providing care and providing treatment in the form of physiotherapy. Both of these goals are considered equally vital. Management and research are given just a passing mention in the day-to-day activities of a typical physiotherapist, and they are not included in the job description on a consistent basis. Many physiotherapists believe that their limited professional autonomy, which is defined as their inability to apply their professional knowledge independently, as well as the actual limits of physiotherapy, which are defined as its immature corpus of knowledge, is a factor that is limiting their employment opportunities. As part of their efforts to integrate management and research into their daily practise, physical therapists have changed and broadened their notions of their profession. In order to be able to verbalise and account for their treatment procedures and outcomes, others have re-examined and enlarged their notions of their profession, while at the same time extending their own specialised, theoretical reservoir of knowledge and experience. According to the research, other advantages associated with such activities include an increase in professional autonomy, as well as the chance to engage with other professionals and the ability to play an active role in the development of overall work goals and procedures.
This video highlights the vast variety of professional obligations that physiotherapists have, as well as the complexity of their work environment.
Conclusion
The findings of this study also reveal that many physiotherapists struggle to assert their specific professional interests, as a result of which they become subordinate to organisational demands rather than being able to organise and fulfil their work in a manner that is believed to be more beneficial for their patients and clients. The inability to appreciate and evaluate physiotherapy as a component of a larger whole is another another limitation of their training and experience. It is necessary to consider hierarchical structures as well as bureaucratic processes in this setting. While physiotherapists themselves have a relatively low level of professional exposure, this is a factor in this development, which is partially responsible for it. A possible explanation for this phenomena might be because physiotherapy is a paramedical profession dominated by women in the great majority of instances, which seems to be related to this phenomenon as well. The current state of circumstances implies that individual physiotherapists will need extra knowledge and abilities in addition to those that are directly related to therapy in order to be able to enhance the level of their professional performance.
A greater focus has been placed on the value of research-informed training in clinical practise, and the number of persons who engage in such training has increased as well. As a consequence, the relevancy of some of the comments has been diminished. As an example, the phrases “grant” and “fellowship” were moved from the section titled “research strategy and planning” to the section titled “research methodologies and techniques” by using the word “transfer.” Examples of this include the incorporation of team-working skills into overarching principles, which was justified because they were deemed relevant to all research activities across the consolidated framework; the incorporation of communication skills into overarching principles, which was justified because they were deemed pertinent to all research activities across the consolidated framework.
References
Burkinshaw, P., Bryant, L.D., Magee, C., Thompson, P., Cotterill, L.A., Mulvey, M.R. and Hewison, J., 2022. Ten years of NIHR research training: perceptions of the programmes: a qualitative interview study. BMJ open, 12(1), p.e046410.
Cheah, K.J., Chan, J. and Manokara, V., 2022. Exploring the Concepts of Clinical Governance and Evidence-based Practice Within the Disability Sector in Singapore. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, pp.1-12.
Hearle, D. and Lawson, S., 2019. Continuing Professional Development Engagement—A UK-based Concept Analysis. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 39(4), pp.251-259.
Lead, A.H.P., Munro, N. and Ritchie, C., AHP Clinical Supervision.
Leone, E., Eddison, N., Healy, A., Royse, C. and Chuckling, N., 2021. Exploration of implementation, financial and technical considerations within allied health professional (AHP) telehealth consultation guidance: a scoping review including UK AHP professional bodies’ guidance. BMJ open, 11(12), p.e055823.
Liddle, J., Lovarini, M., Clemson, L., Mackenzie, L., Tan, A., Pit, S.W., Poulos, R., Tiedemann, A., Sherrington, C., Roberts, C. and Willis, K., 2018. Making fall prevention routine in primary care practice: perspectives of allied health professionals. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), pp.1-9.
Lienesch, J., Murphy, K.A., Parnell, T.E. and Miles, A., 2021. Regional and rural allied health professionals in Australia need better information services training and support for evidence‐based practice. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 38(4), pp.281-294.
Lim, B., Cook, K., Sutherland, D., Weathersby, A.J. and Tillard, G.D., 2022. Clinical Supervision in Singapore: Allied Health Professional Perspectives from a two-round Delphi Study. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 20(1), p.12.
Melariri, H.I., Kalinda, C. and Chimbari, M.J., 2021. Training, Attitudes, and Practice (TAP) among healthcare professionals in the Nelson Mandela Bay municipality, South Africa: A health promotion and disease prevention perspective. PloS one, 16(11), p.e0259884.
Paynter, J., Sulek, R., Luskin-Saxby, S., Trembath, D. and Keen, D., 2018. Allied health professionals’ knowledge and use of ASD intervention practices. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(7), pp.2335-2349.
Priyanka, Kumar, S. and Tiwari, A., 2021. Managing employee turnover: findings from the AHP model. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 22(2-3), pp.219-239.
Timovski, R. and Pacemska, T.A., 2021. Determination of the study program courses contribution to the provided qualifications in relation with the labor market needs using AHP. Воспитание/Vospitanie-Journal of Educational Sciences, Theory and Practice, 16(2), pp.9-14.
Vassos, M., Nankervis, K. and Chan, J., 2019. Clinical governance climate within disability service organizations from the perspective of allied health professionals. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 16(1), pp.67-77.
Vaughan, A., Copley, A. and Miles, A., 2021. Physical rehabilitation of central facial palsy: A survey of current multidisciplinary practice. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, pp.1-10.
Zhang, J., Shi, J., Liu, X. and Zhou, Y., 2021. An Intelligent Assessment System of Teaching Competency for Pre-service Teachers Based on AHP-BP Method. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(16).
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Know more about UniqueSubmission’s other writing services:
