BU7403 Finance for Manager

Assignment  Sample BU7403 Finance for Manager

Introduction

Investment appraisal is a very important aspect of the business. These are critical tools for a business owner to understand the feasibility and viability of a project because correct investment determines the growth and profitability of a company.

a) Calculation of NPV

Project Alpha
Year1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
Income 25,00,000 27,50,000 32,50,000 35,00,000
Less: Expense 12,50,000 13,50,000 15,00,000 17,50,000
Income before tax 12,50,000 14,00,000 16,50,000 17,50,000
Less: Tax @20% 2,50,000 2,80,000 3,30,000 3,50,000
Profit after tax 10,00,000 11,20,000 13,20,000 14,00,000
Discounting factor: @10%
Discounted cash flow 9,09,000 9,25,620 9,91,736 9,58,248
Cumulative discounted
cash flow 37,84,604
Less: initial investment 17,50,000
Net Present Value 20,34,604

 

Project Gamma
Year1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
Income 24,50,000 24,50,000 24,50,000 24,50,000
Less: Expense 9,00,000 9,90,000 10,00,000 11,00,000
Income before tax 15,50,000 14,60,000 14,50,000 13,50,000
Less: Tax @20% 3,10,000 2,92,000 2,90,000 2,70,000
Profit after tax 12,40,000 11,68,000 11,60,000 10,80,000
Discounting factor: @10%
Discounted cash flow 11,27,160 9,65,289 8,71,525 7,39,220
Cumulative discounted
cash flow 37,03,194
Less: initial investment 15,00,000
Net Present Value 22,03,194

It is to be asserted that the net present value appraisal method for Company Bravo, is an important method as it can be concluded that the NPV is obtained from the investment and shows the absolute value of the cash flow that is viewed as the unrealized capital gain of the company (Gaspars-Wieloch, 2019).http://BU7403 Finance for Manager

It is understood from the table mentioned above that project gamma has a higher net present value of 22,03,194 in comparison to 20,34,604 derived from project alpha.

Thus, it can be seen that the project alpha provides greater returns on the investment and greater value addition to the company, especially with regard to the objective of sustainable production. Thus, Company Bravo should implement Project Gamma due to its higher NPV value.

b) Critical evaluation of project appraisal methods

In the case of company Bravo for Project Alpha and Gamma, there exist two investment appraisal methods. These are:

Payback period

It is asserted that the payback period denotes the time period needed to recover the initial outflow of cash and the time needed to achieve a breakeven point (Gorshkov, 2018).http://BU7403 Finance for Manager

This method can be critical for the company because of the following reasons:

  • It is an easy and convenient method to use and comprehend for business owners
  • The method covers the risk element since it stresses on early recovery of the amount that is invested
  • It helps in the quick assessment of an investment project (Sarwary, 2019).http://BU7403 Finance for Manager

Thus, the payback period is an important method for Company bravo to assess the project Alpha and gamma. Nevertheless, the company should focus on the loopholes of the method, which are:

  • It does not take into account the time value of money, which has an impact on the cash flows occurring in different years
  • It does not consider the cash flow that occurs after the payback period and in such a situation, the appraisal method does not give a complete picture of the project in the long run.

Internal Rate of Return

The IRR method and NPV are closely linked. It is asserted that for Company Bravo, the project with a higher IRR will be ranked higher than the one with a lower IRR (Patrick & French, 2016).http://BU7403 Finance for Manager

The method provides the following benefits:

  • It considers the time value of money and since the computation highlights return when the net present value is nil, the minimum rate of return is known.
  • It is simple and convenient to understand for business owners

However, there are certain disadvantages also linked with this method:

  • It stresses the assessment and identification of initial cost and in the absence of it, the evaluation and calculation of the project can be faulty.

c) Critical evaluation of Pricing strategies

Going-Rate Pricing

It can be said that as per this pricing strategy, the firm establishes the base of the price of a commodity mainly on the prices of the competitors for the similar goods or same goods without paying as much stress on the cost of the product and the perception of the value of the product in the mind of the consumers or the difference in the strength of the demand for the good amongst various consumer groups.

It can be seen that based on the situation of the market, Company Bravo can either charge the same price as the market price or charge a price below the competitive price in the market or higher (Ülkü&Hsuan, 2017).http://BU7403 Finance for Manager

Since the competition is very high in the market, Company Bravo will have to charge a price equivalent to or less than the competitive price in the market. The change in the price of the product of Company Bravo will only alter with the change in the market or competitive price or the going rate and not on the demand or the cost of the product.

The rationale behind the going-rate pricing is that the going rate, in the case of Company Bravo, would indicate the collective wisdom of the industry with regards to the condition of demand and in such a case the price, decided would lead to optimum return under such conditions of demands.

Additionally, it is not simple to evaluate the perceived value of consumers or the elasticity of demands or reaction of consumers to changes in prices (Kienzler&Kowalkowski, 2017).http://BU7403 Finance for Manager

Loss leader Pricing

It can be seen that Company Bravo intends to launch a new product in the market. However, it is a brand leader of a complementary product to a new product. Thus, it such a case, it is important to assert that a loss leader pricing strategy denotes an aggressive pricing tactic whereby a company indulges in the sale of a product,

below cost, in order to prepare a broad consumer base, which as per the philosophy of loss leader, would make up for the loss suffered on a product with profit on different goods (Deshpande,2018). http://BU7403 Finance for ManagerIn the case of Company Bravo, the loss suffered on the new product can be compensated with the profit derived from the complementary product since it has a brand reputation and high-value perception in the minds of the consumers.

Conclusion

The research project is conducted on an investment appraisal topic. The research study conducts an investment appraisal for Company Bravo regarding its two projects, Project Beta and Project gamma, and uses the net present value for calculating and assessing its feasibility and viability.

It critically assesses the payback period and internal rate return as a tool for appraisal of investment and analyses the two pricing strategies of the company, which are the loss leader pricing strategy and the going rate tactic.

 

Reference List

Deshpande, S. S. (2018). Various pricing strategies: A review. IOSR Journal of Business and Management20(2), 75-79.

Gaspars-Wieloch, H. (2019). Project net present value estimation under uncertainty. Central European Journal of Operations Research27(1), 179-197.

Gorshkov, A. S. (2018). Payback period of investments in energy saving. Инженерно-строительныйжурнал: специализированныйнаучныйжурнал, (2 (78)).

Kienzler, M., &Kowalkowski, C. (2017). Pricing strategy: A review of 22 years of marketing research. Journal of Business Research78, 101-110.

Patrick, M., & French, N. (2016). The internal rate of return (IRR): projections, benchmarks and pitfalls. Journal of Property Investment & Finance.

Sarwary, Z. (2019). Capital budgeting techniques in SMEs: A literature review. Journal of Accounting and Finance19(3).

Ülkü, M. A., &Hsuan, J. (2017). Towards sustainable consumption and production: Competitive pricing of modular products for green consumers. Journal of cleaner Production142, 4230-4242.

You know more about Services:-

Leave a Comment