Comparison Analysis

Comparison Analysis Of 2002 and 2010 FIFA World Cup


A comparative analysis of international sports events has concentrated generally on team and match-play sports, concentrating the connection among the player and the behaviors and movements of specific team members.

In this way, the comparative analyzer has concentrated on over-all match pointers, technical indicators, tactical indicator and has added to our comprehension of the psychological, physiological, strategic, and technical requests of numerous sports.

Numerous local governments of the country provide significant monetary help to the professional sport steams in a few nations, including the Japan and Korea and South Africa.

Mega sporting events are characterized as those one-time sporting events of the global scale sorted out by a unique “authority” as well as yielding incredibly large amounts of media inclusion and effects (infrastructure, tourism, and economic) for the host community due to the size or significance of the event. The mega event is regularly joined by parallel exercises, for example, cultural events or festivals.

From my point of view, definitely it is. In fact, not just sporting event, it’s the biggest event in the world. Some say, that Olympic games have more audience than Football World Cup, the problem is that anyone that watch football, watch Olympic games as well, but this doesn’t mean that many people prefer Olympic. We might watch 100 hours of Football World Cup.

One thing, where football is the king, is the number of tourists it attracts, it’s absolutely impressive, there have been countries, that had more than 50,000 tourists each in both world cup(Müller, 2015).Furthermore, the team may give direct infusions into the neighborhood economy from onlookers spending on meals, tickets, and cabin, in addition to other things.

In any case, most past experimental investigations on the effect of games on the neighborhood economy have not discovered any noteworthy connection, while some have even discovered a negative relationship. The negative impacts could emerge on account of the open-door costs acquired from swarming out other, increasingly profitable, public consumptions.

This is regularly coped that the most significant account for the choice of the country to host the mega-sporting event which is the possible positive effect of the mage-event on the local economy, that also can increase the social status of the host country.

As indicated by Collet (2013), the economic effect of the mega event that can be stated as the ‘net financial revolution in the host country that outcomes from investment ascribed to the event’.

In addition, the promoter of these endowments regularly guarantee that groups who make it to the FIFA world cup in a key public attendance sports will contribute altogether to the neighborhood economy and hence contribute in a roundabout way to country and legacy of the local government by giving promoting administrations that improve the public image of the local community and consequently pull in business and labor

The impacts of Football World Cups in Korea Japan in 2002 and South Africa in 2010 on overnight stays at hotels, the national income from the travel industry, as well as retail sales are investigated.

For Korea and Japan, no impacts could be separated(Preuss, 2015). For South Africa, 700,000 further overnight stays as well as US$800 million in net national income could be recognized from the travel industry. Curiosity impacts of the stadium,

an image impacts for the host countries, as well as the atmosphere great impact for the populace may be of bigger significance. South Africa may need to adapt to the underuse of the WC (World Cup) stadia in the repercussions of the competition. Be that as it may, there are contentions for why South Africa may understand bigger monetary advantages than previous World cup hosts.

Comparison Analysis

In this way, hosting big sporting events expects nations to embrace mega events and projects, bringing about direct economic effect. The Random Effects model of the impacts of the both 2010 and 2002 FIFA World Cup on the international trade of Japan & Korea and South Africa show a critical increment of exports both after and during the event.  Imports of hosting countries expanded altogether in the years following the event(Preuss, 2011).

Moreover, this prompts an expansion in movement as well as employment in the procurement, construction sector, and engineering identified with infrastructure spending, alongside expanded business and spending in the travel industry division coming about because of the inflow of tourist into the nation (however it can displace  non-event the travel industry as a result of congestion costs), and an increment in customer spending amid the event.

The government of Japan had predicted that the Japanese portion of 2002 World Cup was make a total of $11 billion (around 1,400 billion) to make the long-term improvement to the economy of $26 billion (3,300 billion). It is the volume by which they expect Japanese GDP was increase on the level anticipated without the World Cup.

Along with that, the Korean estimate that investment of $1.54 billion had been completed in arenas, with $2.6 billion devoted in total. Moreover, Korean also estimate outflow identified with the event at $6.18 billion as well as total economic impact of $11.47 trillion gained, about $8.8 billion and like 2.2% of GDP.

In the case of the WC 2010 in South Africa, a special focus had been given provided initial to the economic impacts of the World Cup. The economist forecast that the 2010 World Cup would has the economic impact of US$2.5 billion (R21.3 billion).

Along with that, the comparative analysis gives chances to investigate the natural attributes of the team with the intention of compare the nature of bidding and planning process in the FIFA world cup.

The principle goal of this essay is to analyze the impact of the world cup on respective country and legacy. Examines of variance among gatherings of teams are made so as to describe the performance parameters and discover contrasts that can clarify the viability of the group on the competition.

Bidding and Planning Process

The two national associations bidding to have the FIFA World Cup in 2002, Korea Republic and Japan, have both formally re-affirmed to FIFA their acknowledgment of the official system for the assignment of the World Cup host nation.

In this way, both bidding associations had been asked by FIFA to demonstrate whether they wished to stick to the standards which have connected since the start of the bid technique. These standards predict, among different focuses, that just a single national association will sort out the World Cup final.

Moreover, the Korean Football Association expressed that it would bid thought to the likelihood of co-facilitating the occasion with Japan if so, mentioned by the FIFA Executive Committee.

The two applicants had been counseled following a solicitation with this impact from the eight European individuals from the FIFA Executive Committee in a letter to FIFA President Dr. Joao Havelange.

Each progression of the bidding procedure is available to the general population. Moreover, the Bid Book content as well as the hosting prerequisites are generally freely accessible, as will be the assessment reports for every candidature. In view of these reports, the FIFA Council will settle on a choice and waitlist the bids that fit the bill to be casted a ballot by the FIFA Congress.

Amid this procedure, every single individual vote will be revealed. An ultimate choice by FIFA’s preeminent authoritative body is the aftereffect of an open casting a ballot procedure(Makarychev&Yatsyk, 2015).

Besides, the bidding procedure is represented by essentially expanded principles of lead and, out of the blue, it will be investigated by a free review organization designated by FIFA.

At the end of the day, the football network realizes the stuff to be picked as the host of the FIFA World Cup, and why a decision has been made. Not a solitary choice is protected far from the public examination.

The FIFA World Cup is worldwide football’s most pined for prize and, all things considered, the basic leadership procedure to decide the host(s) of the competition must be as expansive and open as would be prudent.

Out of the blue, it will be the FIFA Congress – the association’s incomparable administrative body, including delegates of every one of the 211-part association – that has a last vote on the setting of the challenge, according to article 69 of the FIFA Statutes.

A guarantee to regard human rights is cherished in article 3 of the FIFA Statutes as well as indicated in the Human Rights Policy of the organization.

FIFA is completely dedicated to directing its exercises regarding facilitating the FIFA World Cup dependent on reasonable occasion the board standards – in accordance with ISO 20121 – and to regarding universal human rights and work benchmarks as per the United Nations’ Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.

In light of this, FIFA likewise requires the usage of human rights and work gauges by the bidding part associations, the administration and different substances associated with the association of the competition, for example, those in charge of the renovation and construction of stadiums, airports, hotels, and training sites.

The assessment of bids would be as unbiased and precise as could be expected under the circumstances.

This incorporates a procedure of evaluating and rating the infrastructural and business parts of each bid – with inability to achieve the base in general score, or even the base prerequisites in one of the key criteria, prompting prohibition.

FIFA has built up the procedure through thatbids are assessed, by essentially improving the evaluation systems and by presenting two new further components, are as below:

Bid Evaluation Task Force

Evaluating and breaking down the various parts of such a mind-boggling try requires quite certain information in various regions, from the specialized ability to the lawful and business suggestions included.

To do this assessment, FIFA will build up a gathering to be made out of specific individuals from the FIFA organization with the applicable ability, the director of FIFA’s Audit and Compliance Committee, the administrator of FIFA’s Governance Committee and an individual from the Organizing Committee for FIFA Competitions(Darby, 2013).

Independent audit organization

An agent of the selected free review organization will likewise go about as an eyewitness of the bid assessment process and of the exercises completed by the Bid Evaluation Task Force.

Bid Evaluation Report

The Bid Evaluation Task Force will be in charge of setting up thebid assessment report surveying allbid. Moreover, this report will contain three key segments:

  1. Compliance evaluation

An evaluation of the dimension of consistence of each bid with:

  • The hosting needs for the competition
  • FIFA’s hosting document templates,
  • The needs of the bidding procedure
  1. Risk appraisal

An appraisal of the risk and advantages of each bid withadverse human rights impacts regarding hosting the challenge and the revenue and cost projection.

  1. Technical assessment report

A specialized evaluation of each bided cover the main infrastructural as well as commercial segments important to arrange a fruitful FIFA World Cup. Moreover,this assessment will outcome in scores (equally for overall and individual mechanisms), determined by a framework built up by FIFA.

The main component in revision of the instruments of FIFA to choose the host of the FIFA World Cup is to protect the truthfulness of the procedure from beginning to end. In this manner, the significant FIFA panels and outside enemy of debasement specialists gave suggestions on the most proficient method to improve this particular part of the bidding procedure (Popovic et al., 2013).

Moreover, the outcome: other than resolving to maintain the FIFA Code of Ethics, every one of the partners associated with this procedure is bound by a severe arrangement of standards and proportions of insurance. This incorporates the FIFA organization, the basic leadership bodies and, particularly, the bidding part associations, whose exercises are administered by the rigorous.

Bid Rules of Conduct

Among different measures, the Bid Rules of Conduct stipulate, are as below:

  • The prohibition of inappropriate gifts
  • The commitment to dependably apply core ethical principles
  • The restriction of any type of collusion or unethical collaboration between member association and severe principles in connection to proposition for football development project and the organization of the friendly matches.

The Bid Rules of Conduct keep on applying amid the facilitating stage, and FIFA claims all authority to end the facilitating understanding whether any exploitative conduct is identified.

The Bidding Regulations spread out various different measures to guarantee the moral conduct of the bidding part associations. These incorporate, however are not restricted to, the accompanying:

  • Any people engaged with the bidding procedure for the member associations, together with consultants, employees, and representatives are needed to give FIFA an assertion of consistence and affirmation that they are assured by the Code of Ethics of FIFA.
  • Everypromotional exercise, incorporating any meeting with individuals from the decision-making bodies and the FIFA organization, and any lobbying exercises need to be completely announced;
  • An autonomous consistence and morals officer with the elite order to help the part relationship in completely consenting to the Bid Rules of Conduct and with normally perceived rule of good governance need to be named;
  • An individual from the Ethics Committee has to be designated as the fundamental contact for the part relationship to help encourage the checking of moral conduct by every single included gathering.

Prior to kick off, FIFA’s expected budget for the South African World Cup was $1.080 billion, which was eventually exceeded. The cash-related operational expenses for the World Cup were $1.111 billion, indicating a 3% higher expenditure than anticipated of $31 million.

FIFA’s expenditures were higher than normal because of the World Cup host being a developing nation and the additional large investments needed for it to be organized successfully.

This included $226 million to the South African LOC, $100 million to the World Cup Legacy Fund for South Africa, $348 million in prize money for countries competing in the World Cup (the winning team gets $30 million), $214 million for TV production,

$204 million marked as other (World Cup Fan Fest, the kick-off ceremony, concerts, and marketing), and the remaining items such as insurance, member associations, team lodging and transportation, preliminary competitions, and referee’s totaled $206 million.

Positive take away post world cup

Expanding the profile of the country can prompt the economic monetary advantage. In this way, the country that host the FIFA football world cup can be confirmed of the constant rise in the travel industry and recognition.

Several countries have all observed this from hosting the FIFA football world cup. Japan & Korea and South Africa with the provocative record of human rights, hosting FIFA world cup could be the mode to increase more notable worldwide acknowledgment.

While South Africa hosted the 2010 FIFA world cup, this was a crucial occasion in introducing the new ‘post-apartheid’ South Africa. Moreover, thishigher profile could be significant to provide financial benefit, for example, pulling in business investment and tourist(Janković et al., 2011).

For South Africa, the World Cup had a major effect to insights of South Africa. In addition, the common people can gain better airport and transportation services which would not presumably have been enhanced in the event that this is not for the sports event.

In this manner,during 2002 and 2010 FIFA World cup, bothhosting nations spent the great deal on particular infrastructure of this sports and on tasks for the case yet the World Cup was not capable to make enough financial benefits.

On the other hand, the huge advantage is the long-haul venture that makes from getting ready for the FIFA world cup. The hosting country will have the legacy of better sporting settings.

In this way, country will normally must put resources into the transport and infrastructure to provide for the tourist. Besides that, the FIFA world cup will realize the flood in media, athletes, and visitors. In addition, it will give an expansion in infusion and spending of cash into the economy of the country.

Even so, this infusion of cash can be present moment as well as have small general effect on the more extensive economy of the hosting nations. Along with that, the infusion of tourist might be stable by the local populace leaving to evade the congestion and influx.

Impact of the world cup on respective country and legacy

The 2010 South African World Cup had a considerable number of skeptics and nonbelievers. Be that as it may, the first run through the World Cup was to be played on African soil, South Africa substantiated itself a commendable host.

Presently with 2002 drawing nearer, it is Japan and Korea’s swing to demonstrate to the world its facilitating abilities. It is attempting to become well known; Japan and Korea need to demonstrate that it shouldn’t be contrasted with other creating nations since Japan and Korea is currently entering first world status. It appears to be all Japan and Korea needs to do is win, and that must change”.

By effectively facilitating a universal challenge, this will say a great deal regarding Japan and Korea’s progression into modernization. South Africa’s universal picture improved as the world had the capacity to see a country from an alternate perspective separated from insufficiency(Marschall, 2012).

The comparison is essential in such a case that Japan and Korea comes up short, it is viewed as falling behind South Africa-a creating nation and accordingly suggesting Japan and Korea isn’t prepared to be viewed as a created country. In the event that the World Cup 2002 winds up being a calamity, the world will address Japan and Korea’s passageway into innovation.

Both are not first world nations; however, their economies are developing and accordingly the World Cup was and is their opportunity to proceed with that development and demonstrate the world how far they have come.

FIFA voiced outrageous questions about whether foundation would be finished in time with respect to South African and Japan and Korea. South Africa sought an inheritance of advancement after the government and individuals would be deserted after the World Cup 2010 was long finished.

Be that as it may, the populace is very much aware of the money related advantages FIFA will get, regardless of South Africa bearing the full brunt to put on the occasion.

Japanese and Koreans, especially human rights activists and those living in poor people and overlooked zones in the urban areas set to have some portion of the diversions, are endeavoring to point out the shameful acts done so as to bring FIFA and the government a decent picture and a substantial benefit.

In the 2006 World Cup in Germany, FIFA made $1.8 billion, of which FIFA cases will be reused into building up the game internationally. In any case, in an alternate article, in spite of knowing the costs, the South African government guarantees that what will be recalled and left when the diversions have gone will far exceed the fiscal expenses.

A previous South African President gladly expressed “The World Cup will be recognized as a minute when Africa stood tall and steadfastly changed the tide of hundreds of years of destitution and strife”.

Despite the fact that the truth of incredible monetary thriving or the World Cup win was exceedingly improbable, the measure of good faith and immaterial advantages that existed appeared to compensate for it, for example, patriotism and pride. An analysis with the Japanese and Korean World Cup, that additionally was a theme for the South Africans’ World Cup (Billings et al., 2015).

This implies after the amusements are over the stadiums won’t be in utilized normally, however rather basically fill in as a stop for future voyagers, or every so often for a substantial show. Generally, it would transform into a misuse of cash.

As of now this is the situation with colossal stadiums left void in South Africa: “If Cape Town had redesigned a current arena instead of assembled another one, it would have relinquished the capacity to have one of the elimination rounds, yet the state could have utilized cash spared to house a fourth of a million people”.

The all-encompassing apparent advantages of structure that arena exceeded the elective alternative: social ventures for the more unfortunate populace.

Facilitating the World Cup conveyed such critical load for the government that it didn’t hesitate placing cash into foundation outfitted explicitly towards football match-ups. Activists in Japan and Korea and occupants of favelas are endeavoring to uncover social issues overlooked by the experts(Cotta et al., 2013).

The cash that will be made will remain in the hands of a couple of, for example, FIFA, notwithstanding the nation itself paying greater part of the expense. Activists in the two nations utilize the worldwide challenge to advocate for government assistant and endeavor to question contentions that the World Cup is useful for the nation all in all.

This is a troublesome contention to make on account of the effectively existing status, significance, and esteem related with facilitating the World Cup. As a for example, the South African government trusted that the World Cup would be “the shot in the eye of Afro-negativity; important worldwide inclusion; the solidifying of national pride and character”.

Japan and Korea plans to put to rest questions of whether arrangements will be finished in time, and whether Japan and Korea are prepared to be viewed as a major aspect of the cutting-edge world. The two nations have done this through football.

Post 2010 World Cup, those that trusted it was by and large helpful to the country ascribed it to a few elements. One sign of achievement was that it squashed that an African nation came up short on the information to host and put on an occasion of that extent.

There were no serious issues, and in spite of the fact that $2 billion was spent, it was utilized to redesign a few airplane terminals and clear new streets.

The CEO of South African Tourism expressed, “The World Cup gave a fabulous chance to showcase South Africa to the world; The World Cup addressed the can-do soul of our kin, national solidarity and national pride” (Göral, 2015). A feeling of solidarity and changed view of South Africa’s abilities and Africa as a mainland appeared to out weight fiscal expenses.

It is difficult to genuinely know whether the nearby individuals all vibe a similar way, and one can’t overlook that neediness still exists in spite of whatever positive viewpoints were picked up. In surveys taken of the Japanese and Korean populace, 80% trust the World Cup will make a type of an incredible commitment to the nation.

It is like surveys taken of the South African populace before the 2010 World Cup. Business analysts anticipated the GDP development in South Africa; however, measurements demonstrate that it really diminished.

One can contend that national unity accomplished, at any rate for a minute, and there are those whose lives changed marginally whenever situated in nearness to new cleared ways. Football gives the way to achieve this, which is the reason the federal government is eager to put forth an admirable attempt to finish development, contribute measures of cash, and bow to FIFA requests so as to do as such.


The World Cup is a period for the nation to know-it-all its culture and nationalism; an opportunity to advance its best picture while hosting the most well-known sport of the world. Japan and Korea and South Africa have had around too many years of popular government and a steady economy for a decent part of those years.

Moreover, it would now be able to utilize this to allow its development as a country by the awarding of the World Cup, and furthermore further that advancement (Jennings & Lodge, 2011).

This is a standout amongst the best open doors for a nation to improve its interior framework enhancements in this field will enable the nation to demonstrate the world that it has a place in the real classes. The World Cup can possibly either approve or debate Japan and Korea and South Africa as a rising financial and political power.

In this way, the chief legacy leftward by the World Cup which are the telecommunication and transportation structure. In any case, the areas wherever those projects happened are mostly very much protected and developed zone.

Along with that, they are unquestionably not the zones which required the rehabilitation. Moreover,both hosting nation deliberate the vast advantage for the people, the way which they put resources into the travel industry related courses as well as this learning could be utilized later in the travel industry.


Billings, A. C., Burch, L. M., & Zimmerman, M. H. (2015). Fragments of us, fragments of them: Social media, nationality and US perceptions of the 2014 FIFA World Cup. Soccer & Society16(5-6), 726-744.

Collet, C. (2013). The possession game? A comparative analysis of ball retention and team success in European and international football, 2007–2010. Journal of sports sciences31(2), 123-136.

Cotta, C., Mora, A. M., Merelo, J. J., &Merelo-Molina, C. (2013). A network analysis of the 2010 FIFA world cup champion team play. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity26(1), 21-42.

Darby, P. (2013). Africa, football and FIFA: politics, colonialism and resistance. Routledge.

Göral, K. (2015). Passing success percentages and ball possession rates of successful teams in 2014 FIFA World Cup. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport (IntJSCS)3(1), 86-95.

Janković, A., Leontijević, B., Pašić, M., &Jelušić, V. (2011). Influence of certain tactical attacking patterns on the result achieved by the teams participants of the 2010 FIFA World Cup in South Africa. Fizičkakultura65(1), 34-45.

Jennings, W., & Lodge, M. (2011). Governing mega-events: Tools of security risk management for the FIFA 2006 World Cup in Germany and London 2012 Olympic Games. Government and Opposition46(2), 192-222.

Makarychev, A., &Yatsyk, A. (2015). Brands, cities and (post-) politics: A comparative analysis of urban strategies for the Universiade 2013 and the World Football Cup 2018 in Russia. European Urban and Regional Studies22(2), 143-160.

Marschall, S. (2012). Sustainable heritage tourism: The Inanda heritage route and the 2010 fifa world cup. Journal of Sustainable Tourism20(5), 721-736.

Müller, M. (2015). What makes an event a mega-event? Definitions and sizes. Leisure Studies34(6), 627-642.

Popovic, S., Akpinar, S., Jaksic, D., Matic, R., Bjelica, D., Popovic, S., … & BJELICA, D. (2013). Comparative study of anthropometric measurement and body composition between elite soccer and basketball players. Int. J. Morphol31(2), 461-7.

Preuss, H. (2011). A method for calculating the crowding-out effect in sport mega-event impact studies: The 2010 FIFA World Cup. Development Southern Africa28(3), 367-385.

Preuss, H. (2015). A framework for identifying the legacies of a mega sport event. Leisure studies34(6), pp.643-664.


Leave a Comment