Effect of Branding Over the Positioning of Any Business Concern

Effect of Branding Over the Positioning of Any Business Concern

Executive summary

Thisstudy has analyzed, discussed, and evaluated the applications of quantitative,qualitative, and mixed studies for three academic journals, investigating the various effects of branding over the positioning of any business concern.

Due to word constraints, several methodological components that are carefully selected are closely examined in this study, so the degree of ambiguity that is the criteria for selection is the best way to go. In most cases, the analysis shows that the selection of an appropriate research methodology depends on the subject matter of the study. The authors place significant emphasis on the data, although this is not a major issue in qualitative research.


Business research can be described as undertaking the methodical research to discover things about management and business. Since branding is an unpredictable marvel, affected by the business environment, society, customer conduct, and a standardized overall approach to manage marketing may not usually be significant for the local attractiveness of the brand.

The obligation of worldwide business and increasing business brandand accommodating quality to construct marketing and adequacy are as yet limited to any business concern. In numerous organizations, branding is an instrument that gives product benefits to customers as pictures or names to which fascinating and convincing affiliations are affixed (Nagar,2019).

Literature Review

According to Dechawatanapaisal (2018), branding has gotten one of the most significant parts of business strategy. However, it is additionally one of the most misjudged. Branding is now and then viewed as simply a promoting capacity.

Along with that, numerous supervisors and business scholars hold the view that branding is regarding the management of brand picture, an additional assignment that can be classified from the primary business of the product managementcommunication.

Moreover,the goal of branding strategy is to make brands that are separated from the competition, in this manner decreasing the number of substitutes in the commercial center. At the point when high brand equity is accomplished through brand separation, the cost versatility of interest turns out to be low, permitting the organization to expand the cost and improve productivity.

Tajeddini and Ratten(2020) clarified that there are numerous elements that characteristic to the brand being effective when stretched out into the product classifications and new markets and the unmistakable one between them being brand validity. Branding is to make care among potential customers about the benefit of meds and medications.

The marketing technique and brand give individuals, as a rule, settled learning of what the product is about and creates a condition of recognizing the brand among various kinds of a comparable product within the market. Additionally, it allows an association to continually test the message and check whether it is being comprehended in the right way. Making brands will engage the associations to isolate their brands from those of competition using both immaterial and impalpable favorable circumstances.

A strong brand will benefit from high buyer dedication, allowing strong arrangements significantly after the patent has passed. Moreover, brands will influence the direction and perspective of representatives and customers.

As stated by Pratihari and Uzma(2018), the effort of an organization in accomplishing the ideal corporate brand character can be shown through different corporate branding measurements. In any case, there is no understanding in the writing on the measurements that establish corporate branding.

Moreover, these are the brand promise, visual identity, brand communication, and brand personality. In contrast, brand culture, vision, positioning, relationship, presentation, and personality are significant parts of the corporate branding that makes the brand identity of any organization. Corporate branding includes the four between related components of corporate name, picture, notoriety, and dependability.

The distinctive factors between brand brands and corporate brands are viewed as the higher vital center, interior just as outside targets, and incorporation of corporate strategy. Since corporate and brand brands are setting autonomous, they are presently perceived as particular elements and they may likewise be considered as equal

As stated by Changet al.(2018), the significance of branding has just expected gigantic importance considering the developing globalization and competition. Branding offers huge development open doors for various ventures. The shoppers require an assortment of branded brands to fulfill their inclination. By effectively branding its brand or administrations, an organization makes its contributions stand separated from the competition in manners that issues to the purchasers.

It turns out to be very hard for the contenders to maintain a strategic distance from the brand name set up and made available to the customers by its adversary rivals. While the service and productare branded, thisrecognizes the organization that manufactured the brands and along these lines decreasing the risk related to after-purchasefrustration.

Moreover,branding is essential for any business concernbecause it helps in focusing on the new markets when the brand extension strategy isapplied while the brands are expanded a few markets are reached. Furthermore, branding additionally advances the name and status of any business concern.

Analysis, discussion, and evaluation of research methodology

The accompanying segment will evaluate and break down the methodology of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed research applied in three academicarticles, examining various patterns in authoritative advancement.

Because of the word limit of the essay, just a couple of sensibly chosen methodological components will be altogether analyzed in the article (see the material depicted in Table 1), the selection paradigm for investigation is the level of apparent ambiguitywhether the methodological option is the most ideal. A complete portrayal of the methodological approach used to the contemplated articles in Table 1.

  McBrideet al. 2018 Castleberryand Nolen, 2018 Wuet al. 2018
Research strategy Qualitative and Quantitative Qualitative Quantitative
The role of theory Inductive and Deductive Inductive (abductive) Deductive
Research design cross-sectional design / multiple case study design and social survey design/ comparative design Multiple case study design or comparative design cross-sectional design orSocial survey research
Level of analysis organization organization Organization
Sampling Theoretical and random sampling or snowball sampling Theoretical sampling Random sampling
Research instrument Self-completion questionnaire or postal surveyand semi-structured interview Multiple data sources: semi-structured interview, company website, social media blogs, intranet, internal records, newspapers, and documentation Secondary analysis
Data analysis Qualitative analysis software package or multiple regression and manual thematic analysis Grounded theory approach Two-stage least-squares regression


Analysis and evaluation ofqualitative research methodological approach

The research objective is to close the present gap in the literature on the effect of branding over the positioning of any business concern.

While additionally much past organizing of the examination would “dazzle the researcher to significant highlights for the situation”, the system that is extremely lost may prompt “unpredictable information assortment and data overload”. Besides, these two sorts of frameworksprefer the differentiation among inductive and deductive approaches. The methodological blend is nearer to the inductive approach than the deductive approach.

Also, the continuous cooperation between experimental perception and hypothesis has been underscored more than “grounded theory”. Similarly,“grounded theory”, the principle worry of the methodological blend is related to the improvement of new thoughts and hypothetical models rather than the affirmation of the existing hypothesis.

Nonetheless, the methodical abductive approach improves the refinement of existing speculations more than new disclosures. Rutberg and Bouikidis(2018) express that the abductive approach is especially compelling if the goal of the researcher is to decide new issues.

Analysis and evaluation ofquantitative research methodological approach

In light of existing research on open development directed by Kaplaniset al.(2018) examined the effect of the research approaches for the external knowledge on their inventive execution in the manufacturing firm of the United States. Kaplaniset al.(2018) set out to investigate the branding model in an assortment of national and modern settings; grow the effect of branding by considering a stable setting and inspect the all-inclusive model.

The investigation under examination is a replication and an augmentation of past research. Even though the capacity to duplicate the examination affirms the legitimacy of the first investigation, the objectives of the research are extraordinary. The author endeavor to keep the sample size, approach, and the research however much adjusted as could reasonably be expected with the firsts.

Wuet al.(2018) utilize the secondary research method as an apparatus for their research. They remove information from the Swiss Innovation Survey depended upon the European “Community Innovation Survey” (CIS) led in most European nations. The chose database is like the database utilized in the first study on the branding, just in the national setting. Branding brings its information from the British Innovation Survey.

As expressed by Grayet al.(2018), the choice to utilize secondaryresearch can have numerous advantages for the researcher, for example, cash and time spared; the arrangement of top-notch information; chances for directing longitudinal examination, subset or subgroup investigation, or multifaceted examination; more opportunity for information investigation;

the chance of re-investigation and the finding of new understandings. On the other hand, the secondaryresearch additionally has a few impediments, namely the absence of colleagues with the researcher’s information, the absence of control over data, the absence of key factors, and data complexity.

Researchers are examining secondary information should gather data about the information assortment process at the earliest opportunity. Additionally, the demographic information should be cautiously contrasted with any populace in which the outcomes will be applied.

Chenget al.(2018)refer to a mistake brought about by the utilization of optional investigation. Rather, toward the finish of their research procedure, they recognize that they were just ready to in part recreate the first research, and implying that most likely started in the national setting or cross-industry impact, or both.

As we would like to think, the applied methodology, predominantly the choice to choose secondary investigation as a research apparatus, assumed a significant job in permitting researchers to effectively seek after their research goals.

Analysis and evaluation ofmixed research methodological approach

A postal study is a type of a self-closing questionnaire (from this point forward S-CQ). Mays and Pope (2020) recorded a few points of interest of S-CQ contrasted with an organized interview with elective research materials. Along with that, S-CQs are faster and less expensive to manage and increasingly helpful for respondents, do exclude any questioner’s inconstancy, and the questioner’s impact is missing. In other words, S-CQ has a few drawbacks when contrasted with the organized interview.

The respondents can’t be examined to clarify them in detail. Respondents ought to limit themselves to questions that are not unique; Open inquiries ought to be prohibited; The specialist can never be certain who addressed the questionnaire. No extra data can be gathered; Several inquiries ought to be constrained; The instrument isn’t appropriate for all respondents; the absence of data at high hazard; and reaction rates are commonly low (McBrideet al. 2018).

The randomsampling method fundamentally permits the researcher to make impedance from the information for an irregular example to the populace from which it was chosen. Be that as it may, lacking reaction rates can seriously confine such assurance.

In the postal research under investigation, just a 25% reaction rate was accomplished. The rate of response beneath 50% of the postal questionnaire isn’t worthy, as the legitimacy of the finding can’t be resolved(Castleberry and Nolen, 2018).

To expand the legitimacy of research dependent on postal surveys, a few researchers have would, in general, utilize the triangulation method to change the aftereffects of the essential research.

In any case, this doesn’t show up in the examination. Case study analyses are utilized to help unload some key discoveries from the general review. Be that as it may, Clarkand Vealé(2018)choose different contextual investigations, contended that a few examiners have utilized a few cases in such a method, that apparently, they rely upon certain theories about statistical results.

Nonetheless, the author utilizes a hypothetical sampling model known as “snowball sampling” for the choice of contextual analysis. The issue with snowball sampling is that the sample is probably not going to be illustrative of the populace.

It very well may be determined that the mixed research under examination has issues with the approval and speculation of its discoveries that most likely emerged from the choice to choose the postal review as the fundamental instrument of the research.

Be that as it may if the essential objective of authors is to increase new thoughts and not to sum up discoveries, at that point a lower level of legitimacy and all-inclusive statement must not be the issue of essential significance (Lee, 2018).

The differences between qualitative and qualitative research methods are measured by the principle of core philosophy. Besides, the research shows that knowledge selection is the most important principle.

To advance management research, it is important to evaluate the methods used by researchers. The effects of conducting research based on the accuracy and consistency of the selected research method. Moreover, design choices about data analysis,materials, and authenticity can influence the kind of decision that can be taken effectively.

The problem with this design is that it affects some practical case studies because of changes in some methodological principles (e.g., internal validity) and nothing is limited to concluding. Also,it appears that choices regarding organizational research, research design, and analysis have vital implications for gathering knowledge over time (Tullyet al. 2019).


From the examination directed, it tends to be seen that both brandings play an essential and effectiverole in the position and performance of any business concern. The business that invests in improving its brand and placing the customer first in its activity is possible to experience development in its performance.

Moreover, the business concern should include themselves in enhancing the branding activity of the organization because it goes far to influence the positioning of any organization.Besides, this is additionally evident that each author puts an extraordinary accentuation on legitimacy, which is to check the exactness of information, although this ought not to be the key issue in qualitative research.

Nonetheless, it appears that the inheritance of common science and the arrangement of granting academic serviceduring the research network. Instead, it despite everything forestalls the chance of qualitative research. Truth be told, an opportunity will come when what we realize will be considered as the dynamic result of any research procedure 


Castleberry, A., and Nolen, A., 2018. Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds?. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning10(6), pp.807-815.

Chang, Y., Wang, X. and Arnett, D.B., 2018. Enhancing firm performance: The role of brand orientation in business-to-business marketing. Industrial Marketing Management72, pp.17-25.

Cheng, M., Edwards, D., Darcy, S., and Redfern, K., 2018. A tri-method approach to a review of adventure tourism literature: Bibliometric analysis, content analysis, and a quantitative systematic literature review. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research42(6), pp.997-1020.

Clark, K.R., and Vealé, B.L., 2018. Strategies to enhance data collection and analysis in qualitative research. Radiologic Technology89(5), pp.482CT-485CT.

Dechawatanapaisal, D., 2018. Employee retention: the effects of internal branding and brand attitudes in sales organizations. Personnel Review.

Gray, V.E., Hause, R.J., Luebeck, J., Shendure, J., and Fowler, D.M., 2018. Quantitative missense variant effect prediction using large-scale mutagenesis data. Cell systems6(1), pp.116-124.

Kaplanis, J., Gordon, A., Shor, T., Weissbrod, O., Geiger, D., Wahl, M., Gershovits, M., Markus, B., Sheikh, M., Gymrek, M. and Bhatia, G., 2018. Quantitative analysis of population-scale family trees with millions of relatives. Science360(6385), pp.171-175.

Lee, D., 2018. Mixed Methods Research Design. Research Methods for Librarians and Educators: Practical Applications in Formal and Informal Learning Environments, pp.237-48.

Mays, N., and Pope, C., 2020. Quality in qualitative research. Qualitative research in health care, pp.211-233.

McBride, K.A., MacMillan, F., George, E.S., and Steiner, G.Z., 2018. The use of mixed methods in research. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences, pp.1-19.

Nagar, K., 2019. Support for the underdog brand biography: Effects on consumer attitude and behavior. Journal of Marketing Communications25(5), pp.477-493.

Pratihari, S.K., and Uzma, S.H., 2018. CSR and corporate branding effect on brand loyalty: a study on Indian banking industry. Journal of Product & Brand Management.

Rutberg, S., and Bouikidis, C.D., 2018. Focusing on the fundamentals: A simplistic differentiation between qualitative and quantitative research. Nephrology Nursing Journal45(2), pp.209-213.

Tajeddini, K., and Ratten, V., 2020. The moderating effect of brand orientation on inter-firm market orientation and performance. Journal of Strategic Marketing28(3), pp.194-224.

Tully, L., Wright, C.M., McCormick, D., and Garcia, A.L., 2019. Assessing the potential for integrating routine data collection on complementary feeding to child health visits: A mixed-methods study. International journal of environmental research and public health16(10), p.1722.

Wu, W., Pirbhulal, S., Zhang, H., and Mukhopadhyay, S.C., 2018. Quantitative assessment for self-tracking of acute stress based on triangulation principle in a wearable sensor system. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics23(2), pp.703-713

Leave a Comment