ISYS 40161 Business Operations and Reliability Management Assignment Sample

Introduction

In Latin America and the Caribbean, extreme weather systems such as tropical cyclones and hurricanes often strike the region’s countries. In the area, between 1970 and 2019, 2,309 catastrophes claimed 510,204 lives, impacted 297 million people, and caused $437 billion in damage, according to the International Disaster Database (EM-DAT) maintained by the Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) , 2020). If a tragedy strikes, the hard-won economic and social advances that communities and countries have earned over decades might be completely undone. This is a very possible possibility in the future. Moreover, as previously said, the situation is particularly dire in developing nations. In light of the fact that natural disasters are often localised phenomena, the spatial component of the issue under consideration will be the major emphasis of this examination. Caribbean islands such as Anguilla and Sint Maarten may experience severe destruction as a result of tropical storms and hurricanes that impact the region (Abdelmalak,2021).

Describe a process/system/service

People who have previously risen out of poverty may find themselves drawn back into it if they are confronted with a catastrophe. As a consequence, the ramifications of tragedy are exacerbated among the most vulnerable members of a population, who may find themselves trapped in a never-ending cycle of vulnerability as a result of the disaster. Unemployed or underemployed people, as well as those with poor productivity and incomes, may find themselves in a state of poverty for an extended period of time if they do not find work quickly after losing their jobs. Consequently, they will be far more susceptible to catastrophic calamities in the future than they are now. In order to achieve sustainable development, it is critical to include resilience into the development plan, primarily because natural catastrophes have such a devastating impact on society (Aros-Vera,2021).

describe the W/H questions

In global frameworks such as the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030, both of which have been accepted by the United Nations, sustainable development concepts are laid out in detail. Having a coordinated, integrated, and government-led plan in place is critical to the success of disaster risk management as a multi-stakeholder undertaking. Increased community preparedness and resilience in the face of natural disasters are required in order to lessen the economic and social impacts of disasters. For disaster risk management techniques to be effective, they must be incorporated into all elements of government operations. This will help to reduce the economic and social repercussions, as well as the economic and social consequences, of disasters.
Due to the fact that identifying potential catastrophic risks is the first step in disaster risk management, it is important to spend as much time as possible on this process. Risk assessments for catastrophic events are effective instruments for achieving this goal.
It has been more than three decades since the establishment of the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), and it has made a number of notable contributions to regional development (ECLAC). Immediately after, a public awareness campaign was launched by the ECLAC, which comprised 34 in-person national and regional training seminars for more than 1,000 government employees from around Latin America and the Caribbean area.
As part of the effort, approximately 1,000 government officials from all around Latin America and the Caribbean attended 34 national and regional training sessions that were held in person throughout the region as part of the Regional Training Initiative.
This was adopted by the Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) as well as the Economic and Social Commission for Central Asia (ESCAP) rather soon.
The Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) and the Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCAP) both approved these ideas relatively quickly. The ECLAC Planning for Disaster Risk Reduction within the Framework of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development of the Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) and the Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCAP) both approved these ideas relatively quickly (ESCWA).
The Latin American and Caribbean Institute for Economic and Social Planning (ILPES) marked the beginning of a new era in disaster preparation with the completion of its first online course on catastrophe assessment approach in 2020.
It was necessary to undertake a total of twelve catastrophe assessments, each of which included estimates of the economic and sociological effects of the particular event under discussion. The capacity to get trustworthy data at the proper moment, as well as the ability to interact with other institutions in order to guarantee that data was shared and coordinated as quickly as possible, were among the most important factors examined by the experts. The Economic Commission’s prior catastrophe evaluations served as the basis for this research, which was based on a large number of incidents from those assessments. The past disaster assessments conducted by the Economic Commission served as a source of inspiration for this investigation (Xu,2018).
It is necessary to take into consideration all of the many variables and components that contribute to sustainable development in order for it to be successful.
As embodied in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sendai Framework, this set of principles also serves to guide the development of system-based approaches to disaster risk reduction and a more complete understanding of the nature of disaster risk, thereby opening the door to new lines of research and methodologies, as well as opening the door to new opportunities for disaster preparedness and response in the lead-up to, during, and after disasters (Chang,2021).
Individual countries are responsible for developing their national development strategies within these global frameworks; however, because natural systems are interconnected, national policies must take into consideration the effects of their policies on natural systems that extend beyond the borders of individual countries, as well as the effects of their policies on natural systems that extend beyond the borders of individual countries; and because natural systems are interconnected, national policies must take into consideration the effects of their policies on natural systems that extend beyond the borders of individual countries; and because natural systems are interconnected,
It is challenging to implement digital rights management (DRM) into planning systems and procedures because of the many challenges that must be solved. It is necessary to consider a large number of components (processes, instruments and institutions), and the interconnections between these components result in difficulties in intertemporal, intersectoral and inter-scale coordination and linkage of a large number of participants, particularly in developing countries.
In disaster risk management planning, it is critical to have an integrated multi-sectoral approach that includes representatives from many levels of government, the commercial sector, and civil society organisations. Methods of development and disaster risk management (DRM) planning must be connected together at the national level in order to be effective. A proper disaster risk management system requires the establishment of five pillars, which include (1) risk identification and assessment, (2) risk reduction and mitigation, (3) preparation and readiness, (4) financial protection, and (5) disaster resilience in the event of a natural disaster or man-made catastrophe. In order to achieve these objectives, it will be necessary to create favourable conditions for efficient resource allocation as well as a clear explanation of the roles and responsibilities of the workers who will be participating (ECLAC, 2019).
When these two processes are intertwined, the outcomes of the research show that a society’s advancements are more robust in the face of catastrophic calamities than when they are not.
The ability to adapt [to threats] by resisting or altering in order to achieve and maintain an acceptable degree of functionality and structure” in a system, group, or civilization that is potentially exposed to hazards is defined as “the ability to adapt [to threats] by resisting or altering in order to achieve and maintain an acceptable degree of functionality and structure.”
In a system, community, or civilisation that is at risk of being destroyed by natural disasters, resilience is characterised as (United Nations, 2005, p. 9).

HOQ for this process/system/service.

When it comes to building a disaster-resilient society, one of the most important jobs is the identification of catastrophic risks that exist in the community, which is then followed by the creation and implementation of policies to mitigate such risks to the maximum degree feasible. DRM is fundamentally an effort to improve the resilience of communities against natural disasters, as well as the overall well-being of the people, by using a human rights-based approach to disaster prevention and mitigation. When an organization’s strategic planning process includes the development of DRM policy tools, that organisation may be able to more effectively allocate its human, technical, and financial resources to meet its objectives in the development of DRM policy tools, resulting in cost savings for the organisation.

In any planning process, it is helpful to have a set of indicators in place since it helps you to track your progress toward the objectives that you have established for yourself. In addition, the fact that catastrophe indicators are not incorporated in national data management systems is a cause of worry for many people. It has been suggested to add a variety of disaster-related indicators linked to the Sendai Framework in order to measure progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals contained in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which was approved in 2015. Efforts by the international community to support national statistics agencies in the formulation and collection of indicators for disaster risk reduction development are being made so that they may track progress and compare it to national goals.

For the purpose of systematising and steering the development of national plans, global tools such as those suggested in this research may be used. Although some nations have been working on digital rights management systems for several years, the truth is that they have only achieved mixed outcomes up to this time. According to evidence gathered by the Regional Observatory on Planning for Development in Latin America and the Caribbean, there are three unique ways to incorporate disaster risk management (DRM) into ECLAC’s development planning processes (ROPDLAC). For the next 15 years, the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations have identified nine approaches to catastrophic risk reduction planning that are within the scope of the goals. The following are the kind of people to keep a watch out for: National or global development plans, disaster risk reduction strategies developed by governments at the national or international level, and local disaster risk reduction strategies, to mention a few examples of what is feasible, are all examples of what is possible.

As previously said, the coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemic is unlike any other tragedy that has happened in the area, and as a consequence, it is generating a new set of challenges for the nations that are afflicted by this illness. International organisations may play a vital role in creating international collaboration in order to launch an effective response to the situation, especially given the issue’s global nature.

Analysis of H0Q

The first chapter of this book gives an in-depth examination of disasters that have happened in Latin America and the Caribbean from 1970 to the present day, organised by region. This chapter is intended to serve as a starting point for gaining a basic understanding of disaster-related vocabulary and ideas, and it will do so in a straightforward manner. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, both of which are international agreements adopted by the United Nations General Assembly, are also featured in this overview. It is in this chapter, which offers a road map for integrating disaster risk management into national planning systems, that the topic of disaster risk management is discussed in great detail (DRM). Additionally, a report on regional accomplishments in this area, as well as an examination of the difficulties that nations in the region are dealing with, are included. When it comes to data and statistics systems, the DRM indicators and their applications are discussed in more detail in Chapter III, which is dedicated to data and statistics systems. Finally, but certainly not least, in the final chapter, the findings and suggestions of the study are discussed in more detail.

Disaster risk reduction (DRR) is a critical component of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, and it is specifically mentioned in the Sustainable Development Goals, alongside issues such as the interactions between disasters and poverty, the availability of food, access to health care, the provision of water and sewerage systems, infrastructure and urban development, as well as climate change and the preservation of ecosystems, among others. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which was approved in September 2015, includes commitments to decrease vulnerability, develop capacity, and improve catastrophic resilience. (According to Agenda 2030.) In addition, see figure I.2 for further details (Dietze,2021).

Specifically mentioned in the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Growth is the fact that natural catastrophe risk has an impact on a broad variety of developmental characteristics, including economic development.

DRM practises are directly or indirectly addressed by nine of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) included in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, including the target of decreasing catastrophic risk by 2030 (Ahuja,2021).

In the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, it is acknowledged and emphasised that catastrophic risk reduction is important. It is also indicated in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development that catastrophic risk reduction is necessary. According to prior statements, a horrible tragedy may jeopardise a society’s capacity to continue on its long-term development path, as well as destroy years of economic and social progress. Consequently, DRM must be taken into account in any long-term company plan that exists.

For the achievement of the Sustainable Development Objectives, a global framework for disaster prevention and mitigation has been developed to aid in the achievement of these goals. For the purpose of minimising and alleviating catastrophe-related losses, the framework specifies seven global objectives that must be realised.

This approach to disaster risk management is a paradigm change away from the traditional perspective of catastrophe risk and toward a more holistic approach to risk management that recognises that economic, social, and environmental challenges are all intertwined and interdependent. Catastrophes have an influence on everyone, and the seven global goals include a myriad of ideas that all aim to reduce the impact of disasters while also addressing the factors that increase the possibility that disasters will occur in the first place. There are seven areas to take into consideration while evaluating the seven global objectives (threats and vulnerabilities). In the contemporary environment of globalisation, the concept of responsibility in disaster risk management (DRM) is considered as crucial in the transition toward more resilient and long-term societies.

ECLAC Effective catastrophe risk reduction strategies are required, according to the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

It is hoped that the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction will “significantly reduce disaster risk and losses in people’s livelihoods, health, and assets in the economic-social-cultural-environmental sectors” by 2030. It also aspires to “significantly increase the resilience of people to disaster risk and losses.” Organización Nacional de las Naciones Unidas (2015b, p. 6) Implementing integrated and inclusive economic and structural policies and structures that reduce hazard exposure as well as vulnerability to disasters, while also increasing preparedness for disaster response and recovery and strengthening resiliency, is essential for achieving both the prevention of new disaster risk as well as the reduction of existing disaster risk (United Nations, 2015b, p. 6).

In addition to the Framework’s seven global goals (see box I.2), which are discussed in further depth below, it identifies four essential areas for strengthening resilience by avoiding new catastrophic risks from arising and lowering present risks. These are discussed in greater detail below. The following are the kind of people to keep a watch out for: On order to achieve our goals, we will be concentrating our efforts in four areas, which are as follows:

Although I am aware of the possibility of a natural disaster occurring, it is critical for all stakeholders involved in the risk assessment to have a complete understanding of the components of catastrophic risk, including their level of sensitivity to hazards and the level of vulnerability of their assets, as well as their potential for exposure to hazards and exposure to the environment Knowing how to evaluate, avoid, and mitigate catastrophe risk, as well as developing, implementing, monitoring, and evaluating correct preparations and successful disaster response methods, may be beneficial in a variety of scenarios. Developing, implementing, monitoring, and evaluating correct preparations and successful disaster response methods may be beneficial in a variety of scenarios. The United Nations, which was established in 1945, is a multinational organisation with a worldwide reach. (9th page of United Nations, 2015b).

Limitations

The second way for improving disaster management and the impacts of catastrophes is to improve governance in order to do so more effectively. Disaster management and the consequences of disasters are two different things. Disaster risk governance at the national, regional, and global levels must be developed in order to achieve effective and efficient disaster risk management at the national, regional, and global levels (Shiravand,2021). Many factors influence the achievement of desired outcomes, including the presence of a clearly stated goal and plan, the presence of competent leaders, the presence of clear direction, the presence of effective coordination across sectors, and the presence of significant participation from key players (Satzer,2018).

Strengthening disaster risk governance is essential, given the interconnections between disaster risk reduction and long-term economic and social development; it also encourages cooperative efforts across processes and institutions to deploy appropriate solutions (Zygmanski,2018).

There are two big expenditures that must be made in disaster recovery and disaster recovery planning: the first is a significant cash investment, and the second is a significant time commitment. In accordance with the World Bank, global disaster risk mitigation strategies, such as structural and nonstructural disaster risk mitigation strategies, can assist individuals and communities in developing more resilient economies that are more socially and physically healthy, as well as in strengthening their assets and the natural environment. They all have the potential to be catalysts for the development of new ideas, the progress of technology, and the creation of new employment opportunities. In the aftermath of a tragedy or accident, cost-effective solutions are critical for preserving lives, minimising damage, and ensuring that those who have been harmed have a good recovery and rehabilitation process (United Nations, 2015b, p. 14).

An improved level of disaster preparation is crucial for both promptly reacting to catastrophes and “building back better” in the fields of recovery, rehabilitation, and rebuilding when a disaster occurs. In view of the rising threat of natural disasters and the lessons learned from previous disasters, it is imperative that the United States improve its disaster response capabilities in the coming years. For example, taking action ahead of events, including disaster risk reduction into response planning, and ensuring that enough resources are available for effective disaster response and recovery at all levels are just a few suggestions. Women and persons with disabilities should be encouraged to take the initiative and fight for solutions that are both gender-equitable and accessible to all parts of our society, rather than being marginalised or ignored. This is one of the most important things we can do as a society to advance equality and inclusion, and it is one of the most important things we can do as individuals. It is critical to “build better” immediately following a disaster, and this can be accomplished in a variety of ways, including the integration of disaster risk reduction (DRR) into development policies and measures, the enhancement of nations’ and communities’ resilience to disasters, and a variety of other approaches (Rabiee,2018).

Natural catastrophes, such as those that have recently affected the Philippines, pose a significant threat to the long-term development of nations that are particularly prone to natural disasters, such as the Philippines, since they cause widespread devastation. World Risk Index, which measures countries’ exposure and vulnerability to risks associated with natural disasters, finds that more than half of the countries in Latin America and the Caribbean are at high or extremely high risk of natural disasters, such as earthquakes, tropical cyclones, or earthquake-related tsunamis. According to the World Risk Index, earthquakes, hurricanes, and tsunamis are among the most frequent natural disasters that occur in the area, with earthquakes being the most prevalent in the world. A single catastrophe, particularly in nations with a high degree of disaster risk, might have catastrophic repercussions, wiping out all previous progress and having a systemic influence on all parts of development at the same time.

Unemployment and underemployment among the poor, persons with disabilities, women and girls, refugees and migrants, children and young people, indigenous peoples, and the elderly are among those most susceptible to catastrophes, according to the United Nations. “…these people may get caught in lengthy cycles of unemployment and underemployment, poor productivity, and low earnings, rendering them especially prone to extremism…” once a calamity occurs. UN Economic Commission for Europe (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe). Natural disasters are becoming more likely to have systemic consequences in the future, as a result of the increasing frequency and intensity of human activities around the globe, according to the World Meteorological Organization. Consequently, as a consequence of these systemic implications, there is the possibility of unanticipated cascading impacts on the human population in addition to the economics, politics, and the environment as a whole. The probability of damage to the whole system grows as the stakes are increased, and the scope of this possible harm becomes more expansive as the stakes are raised( Oboni,2021).

Among the global disaster risk variables that occur in various degrees across the globe are poverty, urbanisation, bad governance, depleting ecosystems, and climate change, to name just a few. Disease, starvation, and natural catastrophes are examples of additional factors. In spite of the fact that climate change will have far-reaching consequences, some aspects of its implementation, such as the development of tourist infrastructure in hurricane-prone coastal areas like the Caribbean and the planting of water-intensive crops in arid regions such as northern central Chile, have the potential to exacerbate already high levels of risk in already vulnerable regions. As a result of a development pattern that exacerbates already existing gaps and inequalities, poor people and exclusionary social and political processes are exacerbated even more. The only way for societies to become more robust to natural catastrophes and climate change is for them to be built on the principles of social justice and equality. To do this, governments and communities must ensure that all various points of view and religious beliefs are recognised without endangering the most vulnerable members of society.

As a first step in the process of developing a risk management strategy, it is necessary to map out current environmental hazards and identify vulnerable infrastructure (for example, schools and hospitals) that can be used as starting points for developing a risk management approach (for example, water distribution, electricity, and telecommunications networks) (ECLAC, 2019). It is necessary to identify and measure the effect of a disaster on vulnerable groups at several stages of the crisis’s progression: before, during, and after the disaster. An array of criteria must be considered, including the features of these people’s socioeconomic and demographic backgrounds, as well as their environmental and institutional circumstances, among other things.

Potential hazards may be recognised and plotted on a map, and the information obtained from this process can be used to guide the development of property management and land-use plans, as well as the formulation of construction rules and regulations.

In the course of future building projects, the knowledge included within these maps may prove to be beneficial. In order to complete this action, public institutions should produce risk profiles of their infrastructure, which will reveal whether or not facilities are situated in high-risk locations. This action should be carried out with the support of public institutions. This will assist you in the accomplishment of this assignment, so thank you for your cooperation (ECLAC, 2019). Over the last several years, researchers across Latin America and the Caribbean have made significant strides in understanding the hazards to which people are exposed. It is expected that this development will continue in the next years as well. Every country’s map displays in vivid detail the many threats that may be found in that country’s territory. Even if there is still room for improvement, it is still possible to improve the structural integrity of buildings in high-risk areas by using modern techniques.

The following statistics, which are relevant to this particular area of planning, could be improved:

The system allows for the registration of many types of infrastructure, including residential and nonresidential constructions. Other forms of infrastructure may also be recorded, such as transportation infrastructure (schools, hospitals and businesses).

Infrastructure data must be captured and stored in infrastructure databases for a variety of types of infrastructure, including transportation lines, ports, power plants, and water treatment facilities, to name a few examples of what is required.

The availability of this kind of information is becoming more vital for the georeferencing of these registrations and surveys, as well as for the DRM. Despite the fact that several nations in Latin America are making major strides forward, the accomplishments achieved by Brazil and Mexico in the field of georeferencing stand out as especially noteworthy.

As a consequence, the statistics offices of Brazil, Chile, and Mexico have reported increases in regional GDP as well as quarterly breakdowns of national accounts, all of which are critical for catastrophe risk assessments.

Every stakeholder should be included in the process of making environmentally relevant decisions, which should be done in a participatory and open way. The process should be as transparent as possible. The Index of Governance and Public Policy in Disaster Risk Management (iGOPP) and the Index for Risk Management (InfoRM) are two instruments that may be used to assess a country’s disaster-related vulnerabilities at the moment (see box II.2 below).

It is possible to compare different kinds of data with more confidence using these indexes because the techniques that were used to create them are transparent, which implies that they may be used to compare different types of data with greater confidence.

Aspects of this category include risk mitigation measures as well as their integration into the governance structure of the organisation. As a result of these strategies and their integration into the governance structure, it may be necessary to make modifications to national laws and regulations as well as to other long-term planning instruments, as well as to revise other long-term planning instruments (ECLAC, 2019). Almost often, natural catastrophes do severe damage to infrastructure because it was built incorrectly or in an unconvenient position during the development process in the first place. The use of investment strategies and programmes that take into consideration vulnerabilities and entail attempts to reduce a community’s or asset’s exposure to an event or hazard is also regarded to be a component of risk management (ECLAC, 2019). The use of land management techniques, the creation of construction standards and regulations, and the administration of public investment all have the potential to improve the effectiveness of planning as a DRM instrument.

When it is anticipated that natural catastrophes may occur, it is vital to include this risk into the construction of development master plans at all phases of the process, including the creation, modification, and updating of the plans. The creation of a water and sewerage system must take into consideration all components of the overall strategy, which may include environmental management, infrastructure development, flood mitigation, zoning and land use planning, and other related considerations (ECLAC, 2019).

The development of acceptable building standards, as well as their widespread use, are critical components of the execution of this pillar.

It has been a long time since building rules were revised to include the notion of vital infrastructure into their planning and design (i.e., assets that are critical to the proper operation of society and the economy). When constructing critical infrastructure, it is important to consider the size and strength of the building being created. This will ensure that it can resist the most prevalent threats. It is included in this category to have nuclear power plants. Food storage and distribution are not the only things covered; health and education are also included, as are the infrastructure and systems for water, electricity, and communication transmission (ECLAC, 2019). Chile, Costa Rica, and Mexico are among just a few of nations that have strict construction regulations, which are often changed in the wake of major earthquakes.

A multi-hazard assessment component should be included in every new public infrastructure investment, according to global health organisations, and this review should be carried out in accordance with a country’s development strategy, they advise. Ministers should include steps to guarantee that infrastructure investments are safeguarded from the commencement of construction until the project’s completion, as well as processes to ensure that infrastructure investments are protected after the project has been completed, when projects are approved. It is necessary to strengthen human economic, social, health, cultural, and environmental resilience by investing in structural and nonstructural catastrophe prevention and disaster risk reduction efforts in the public and commercial sectors, as well as through partnering with other organisations. In order to develop human economic and social resilience as well as health and cultural resilience as well as environmental resilience, these investments are necessary. Additionally, these investments are required in order to increase the environmental resilience of people, communities, and countries.

The combination of these factors has the potential to spur innovative product development while also stimulating economic growth and the creation of new job possibilities at the same time.

As one of the most convincing situations in which an integrated public-private health investment system has the potential to raise the standard dramatically, according to the World Health Organization, Colombia is on the frontlines of catastrophic risk reduction (DRR).

Conclusion

To ensure that disaster risks are managed effectively, an integrated disaster risk management component has been integrated into the Central American and Dominican Republic (SNIP) disaster risk management framework in accordance with the Hyogo Framework for Action and in collaboration with the Coordination Centre for Natural Disasters in Central America and the Caribbean and the Dominican Republic (CPND) in Central America and the Dominican Republic (SNIP) (CEPREDENAC). In line with the country’s public investment plan, the project design and assessment procedures were the first in the world to include concerns for catastrophic risk reduction into the process, making them the first of their type in the world (Fallas, 2010). SNIP’s Regulatory Framework: Presidential Executive Order on Unification of the SNIP’s Regulatory Framework was signed into law by President Barack Obama in 2009. A guidebook on public investment project discovery, planning, and assessment, published by the SNIP in the year 2010, was the organization’s first publication.

An integrated Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) module with multi-hazard capabilities is included in the system. This module is intended for use in the assessment of public investment projects that are sensitive to disaster risk, among other things (MIDEPLAN, 2010). The conclusion was that public investment projects had to include a catastrophic risk reduction component that was proactive, rather than reactive, rather than reactive, rather than reactive, rather than reactive.

References

Abdelmalak, M. and Benidris, M., 2021, October. Proactive Generation Redispatch Strategy Considering Unavailability of Renewable Energy Sources during Hurricanes. In 2021 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting (IAS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Ahuja, S.S., Gupta, V., Dangui, V., Bali, S., Gopalan, A., Zhong, H., Lapukhov, P., Xia, Y. and Zhang, Y., 2021, August. Capacity-efficient and uncertainty-resilient backbone network planning with hose. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGCOMM 2021 Conference (pp. 547-559).

Aros-Vera, F., Gillian, S., Rehmar, A. and Rehmar, L., 2021. Increasing the resilience of critical infrastructure networks through the strategic location of microgrids: A case study of Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 55, p.102055.

Chang, C.C., 2021. Optimal preventive replacement last policy for a successive random works system with random lead time. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, pp.1-15.

Craig, T.K., Bob-Manuel, K.D.H. and Theophilus-Johnson, K., SYSTEM RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF OFFSHORE PIPELINES.

Dietze, M., Krautblatter, M., Illien, L. and Hovius, N., 2021. Seismic constraints on rock damaging related to a failing mountain peak: the Hochvogel, Allgäu. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 46(2), pp.417-429.

Dietze, M., Krautblatter, M., Leinauer, J., Illien, L. and Hovius, N., 2021, April. The melody of a failing peak-seismic constraints on rock damaging and stick-slip motion at the Hochvogel (DE/AT Alps). In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts (pp. EGU21-2602).

Gonzalez-Mathiesen, C., Ruane, S. and March, A., 2021. Integrating wildfire risk management and spatial planning–A historical review of two Australian planning systems. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 53, p.101984.

Henson, C.M., Decker, N.I. and Huang, Q., 2021. A digital twin strategy for major failure detection in fused deposition modeling processes. Procedia Manufacturing, 53, pp.359-367.

Kaddoura, K. and Zayed, T., 2021. Intelligent Optimized Decision-Support System for Sewer Network Assets Improvement. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 27(4), p.04021045.

Li, H., Díaz, H. and Soares, C.G., 2021. A failure analysis of floating offshore wind turbines using AHP-FMEA methodology. Ocean Engineering, 234, p.109261.

Machocki, K.K., Marhoon, Z., Shaarawi, A., Sehsah, O. and Dixon, T., 2021, September. A New Condition Monitoring System Improves the Reliability of the RCD Element During the MPD Jobs. In IADC/SPE Managed Pressure Drilling & Underbalanced Operations Conference & Exhibition. OnePetro.

Mays, J., Craig, M.T., Kiesling, L., Macey, J.C., Shaffer, B. and Shu, H., 2022. Private risk and social resilience in liberalized electricity markets. Joule, 6(2), pp.369-380.

Oboni, F. and H Oboni, C., 2021. Mankind, Risks and Planning. In Convergent Leadership-Divergent Exposures (pp. 19-51). Springer, Cham.

Olsen, T., Stiffler, N.M. and O’Kane, J.M., 2021, April. Rapid Recovery from Robot Failures in Multi-Robot Visibility-Based Pursuit-Evasion. In 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (pp. 9734-9741). IEEE.

Rabiee, S., Basich, C., Wray, K., Zilberstein, S. and Biswas, J., 2022. Competence-Aware Path Planning via Introspective Perception. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

Satzer, P., Komuczki, D., Pappenreiter, M., Cataldo, A.L., Sissolak, B. and Jungbauer, A., 2021. Impact of failure rates, lot definitions and scheduling of upstream processes on the productivity of continuous integrated bioprocesses. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology.

Shiravand, V., Faiz, J., Samimi, M.H. and Djamali, M., 2021. Improving the transformer thermal modeling by considering additional thermal points. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 128, p.106748.

Van Driel, W.D., Jacobs, B., Watte, P. and Zhao, X., 2022. Reliability of LED-based systems. Microelectronics Reliability, 129, p.114477.

Xu, Z., Xiao, X., Warnell, G., Nair, A. and Stone, P., 2021, October. Machine learning methods for local motion planning: A study of end-to-end vs. parameter learning. In 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR) (pp. 217-222). IEEE.

Zygmanski, P. and Halvorsen, P., 2021. Routine pretreatment patient‐specific IMRT QA (PS‐IMRT‐QA) should be discontinued and replaced with a real‐time on‐board beam monitoring system (BMS). Medical Physics, 48(9), pp.4715-4718.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Know more about UniqueSubmission’s other writing services:

Assignment Writing Help

Essay Writing Help

Dissertation Writing Help

Case Studies Writing Help

MYOB Perdisco Assignment Help

Presentation Assignment Help

Proofreading & Editing Help