LAW5460M Insolvency Law Assignment sample

 

Module Code And Title : LAW5460M Insolvency Law Assignment sample

1. Introduction

The thesis statement of this study is to highlight the legislature of the Insolvency Act under 1986 in terms of pursuing corporate rescue outcomes in the UK. On the other hand, this study is going to scrutinise several outcomes which are also connected with Insolvency Act 1986. This study is trying to address the specific issue which creates a negative impact on the legislative action of the UK government as well as also greatly involved in the area of administration procedure. The ultimate administration process is specifically designed in terms of holding an organised business together while it’s planning equally which is formed to put in a specific place of financial restricting. Insolvency arises when an organisation has insufficient assets in terms of covering its debts or it is quite unable to pay its debts when they fall due. In recent years, the process of administration has been in the limelight with respect to the huge number of high-profile administrations on high street.

2. Main body

Issue

The Insolvency Act 1986 has specifically governed several types of business and administration related issues which are highly related to its personal bankruptcy. Besides that, it is also connected with the surface of Individual Voluntary Arrangements as well as other necessary administrative orders that are quite related to the aspect of company insolvency. On the other hand, it is specifically acknowledged that the core rationale of some significant kind of corporate rescue is necessary to capture the surplus of going concern value of chosen assets in respect to company insolvency[1]. Besides that, it can be also acknowledged that the respective value of a company’s related business and its key operations are more likely to be far greater than the main scarp value regarding its respondent asserts. Along with this, it is quite possible in terms of asking the area administrator as well as the court in terms of getting permission for bringing proceedings[2]. Moreover, it can be idealised that it is against the organisation which is in administration. Although, the creditor has easily offered a monetary claim that’s ideally unlikely to be granted permission. In this regard, it is effectively claimed which have its own proprietary nature that is specifically allowed to be continued.

One of the major insolvency issues which are interconnected within the surface area of administrative procedure of an organisation in the UK is to be insolvent in case of its failure to pay necessary bills. Besides that, it is also applicable in case of the company not able to pay bills for long terms and the total of its general liabilities specifically exceeds the exact total value of available assets. Several kinds of warning signs regarding the insolvency of a company and its administrative process can be visualised through a consistently poor amount of cash flow in the financial assets of a business. Besides that, the functioning level of a company in the UK at presenting at a specific limit which is going to overdraft. Along with this, another major issue has been context to the area of administrative process depending on pressure from the creditors. Sometimes, negative consequences have been conceptualised in case of the administrative structure is not well, as a result, the company has failed to pay regularly to its active employees.

The experiencing lack of amount of cash flow along with ongoing losses in business operations creates multiple risks to proceed the business in an organised way. Besides that, the basic operational cost regarding the ongoing premises of business structure is down and also triggers the risk of constant threats about some legal action in respect to unpaid bills. In this regard, the Insolvency Act 1986 is for this specific company which is faced with a huge range of economic and other necessary interrelated business issues. Insolvency is a kind of critical situation when the organisation in the UK is quite unable to repay its necessary outstanding financial loan to the respective lender in a certain due time. In this regard, the high court of the UK has merely appointed a type of official liquidator whose initial job is based on collecting all the liquidated business assets. The insolvent act as well as paying off the ultimate proceeds to the respective creditors has been listed in the functional structure of the insolvency procedure.

The main cause of insolvency is due to poor planning and the responsive procedure is highly interlinked with poor financial management. However, there have been multiple reasons to create these negative positions including loss of business revenue, losses in the credit area, loss of cash flow as well as loss of capital[3]. On the other hand, the insolvency administrator has a strong power in terms of doing anything which is expedient or necessary with respect to the management of affairs. The role of administrative procedure can be solely involved in the business operational procedure as well as get the formality of property of the organisation through removing the key directors and other appointed directors.

Rule

The very long-awaited rules and regulations regarding Insolvency Rules 2016 has been laid before Parliament on 2016, 25th October [4]. On the other hand, it has been coming into the legislation force in 2017, 6th April. Besides that, the Insolvency Rules 1986 as well as all amending legislation has been repealed.” Section 222 1under Insolvency Act 1986″ is showing configuration about inability in terms of paying debts. Along with this, the rule has been applied during unpaid creditors regarding £750 or more. In this specific case, the organisation has stopped their work for three weeks after getting the service of demand which is typically neglected in terms of paying the sum to secure or compound. It is largely deliberate for delivering service to the satisfaction of the creditor. On the other hand, the administrative process has been merely introduced by the legislative form of “the Insolvency Act 1986” as it is critically amended by the form of “the Enterprise Act 2002” among the UK based organisations.

The Insolvency Act 1986 regarding the structure of parliament of the UK has been offered a kind of legal platform in respect to all necessary organisational matters which are related to both corporate and personal insolvency in the United Kingdom. The chosen act has been applied to get a stable action regarding the disruptive structure of the organisation which has a very limited liability partnership as well as engaged in a partnership within a breathing space[5]. The breathing space has helped to allow a specific rescue package as well as get more range of additional advantageous realisation of the available business assets that used to be put in an exact place.

On the other hand, there have been outstanding changes that have not yet been made through the legislative area by UK governance[6]. Hence, it is a kind of legal act applicable in the UK in terms of consolidating some enactments that are ideally related within the structure of organisational insolvency as well as also winding up unregistered organisations. Moreover, it has been idealised that the enactment is quite related to the force of insolvency as well as the bankruptcy of individuals with other enactments. It is also bearing on two different subjective matters which include qualification as well as functions of an insolvency practitioner.

The Insolvency Act in 1986 critically embraced a specific objective in respect to promoting certain recovery through the introduction of two different rescue procedures. One rescue procedure is covering companies’ prior which is usually applied to the aspect of formal insolvency. Another rescue process has been applied for administration regarding the affected organisations which are most closely to the form of insolvency. On the other hand, “the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (CIGA Act 2020)” in the UK has ideally introduced a type of new process as well as applicable measures in terms of seeking early rescue of organisations[7].

The rescue process is selectively based in the context of financial distress as a sedimentary result of pandemic effect due to Covid-19 which actions resulted in a huge range of economic crises. In this regard, it can be concluded that the form of the Insolvency Act 1986 has been actively designed in terms of critically dealing with several optimal issues as a type of underutilisation regarding provisions of the chosen schemes of strong competition[8]. Moreover, it is also useful for a certain arrangement once the bankruptcy proceeding is active under the acceptance of the Bankruptcy Act 1974[9]. The above-mentioned act has been specifically established as an option of a more flexible system and operation in respect to the aspect of voluntary arrangements.

Section 21 regarding the general Insolvency Act has been provided as a type of additional impact in respect to sequestration of an estate of an insolvent spouse. The estate has been placed due to vesting of the other estate of the solvent spouse initially in the Master. The above discussion is strongly contradicted as a general purpose of the Insolvency Act under the rules of section 21[10]. On the other hand, the constitution regarding the most relevant provision of the formation of the Insolvency Act has shown its activeness which decided with core reference to the area of interim Constitution. Besides that, Section 65, 64 and 21 of the rules and legislation of the Insolvency Act has been placed under scrutiny in this specific case[11]. Along with this, it can be conceptualised that Section 21 has ideally objected to on the surface of constitutional grounds of the exact right to legal equality and the right to property[12]. In this case, the accounted organisation in the UK can be easily dissolved without going through the surface of any insolvency procedure. All administrative, administrators’ receivers, as well as liquidators, have taken office which is effectively authorised under insolvency practitioners.

Section 21(3) has strongly required the trustee as he can in terms of ascertaining the address of the area of a solvent spouse[13]. In this case, it is necessary to offer the person a written notice for the upcoming six months regarding the exact intention of the person to be able to realise their own business property. Moreover, it is also interconnected for publishing such a legal notice in the UK government Gazette. Another legal notice has been sent through a newspaper circulating in the surface area of the district as in this place has been listed as a solvent spouse residing[14]. Along with this, the princess regarding terminating, extending as well as obtaining a moratorium under the legislative rule of Part A1 in respect to the Insolvency Act 1986[15]. In this regard, it can be said that the core impact of the moratorium on the business creditors as well as other subsequent priorities has been strongly accorded in terms of certain pre-moratorium along with moratorium debts in the context of the letter insolvency process[16]. Moreover, “Sections 268 and 267” of the form of the Insolvency Act 1986 has specifically set out an optimal circumstance in this case, the individual has merely been deemed very unable[17]. In this case, the individual is unable to pay its necessary debts in case one of its creditors has presented a petition of bankruptcy.

According to the governmental rules in the UK for the Insolvency Act 1986 has been provided to the organisation or any individual who are actively unable for clearing their past debts in case of owing nearly £5,000 in respect to the creditor of business operation[18]. During these circumstances, the creditors have applied one of two selected conditions. The organisation or individual has not clearly paid, compounded as well as secured structure of a statutory demand regarding the debt within the next three weeks which is being served with a specific demand. However, it is not properly applied to the context of a high court in the UK in terms of setting aside its own demand of statutory. Another condition has placed like the creditor has strongly attempted in the form of execution in that place the debt has merely arisen from a legal court judgement[19]. On the other hand, another enforcement process also applied during this ongoing disruptive condition which applied against the individual or an organisation in order to the debt without any success.

Application

The main changes presented in the corporate law in the UK were looked at as the Joint Stock Company Act 1844 which came about into an exhaustive system in wrapping up law. The Companies Act 1862 first time presented the possibility of intentional ending up by the court. The regulation of 1844 presented a total division among corporate and individual indebtedness. The Act contained arrangements explicitly for corporate indebtedness and this was joined by wrapping up arrangements in the Limited Liability Act[20]. The Limited Liability Act gave individuals restricted obligations for the obligations of the business entities. Apart from this, any credit arrangement entered by a singular part rather than through a corporate substance was rejected from the ambit of restricted risk. The further organization was presented in the Enterprise Act 2002. The organization is a method by which an outer supervisor, the executive, is named to deal with the organization.

In addition, the scheme, which has been endorsed by gatherings of lenders and individuals from the organization, actually needs after an application, the authorization of the court, before it becomes effective. Several authors said that when a plan becomes compelling, it will bindingly affect the organization and every one of the impacted gatherings, even on the contradicted ones as per area 899 section 3[21]. Additionally, the court likewise has the legitimate right to invalidate a plan of course of action which has been authorized before on the off chance that a misrepresentation is set up. In the present corporate world, where people live, organizations’ capital constructions have become progressively perplexing. Consequently, plans of course of action under the Companies Act 2006 have been set up as the rebuilding methodology for bothered organizations. The prevalence of such plans has been developing step by step among organizations wishing to rebuild their obligations under the adaptability introduced by English law.

Comparable activity is important to improve the economy and keep away from the cascading type of influence of corporate disappointment. Corporate salvage methods give an option in contrast to liquidation when an organization is close to bankruptcy. In the United Kingdom, the plans of course of the action system partake in a long regulative history which can be followed back to the late nineteenth century. At first, made in the Companies Act 1862, Schemes of course of action are seen as a top pick and adaptable instrument, all around tried in court yet as yet developing practically speaking. Hence, it is classified in the UK’s Companies Act 2006[22]. Plans are not officially an indebtedness continuing or part of the lawful structure for bankruptcy. In addition, bank plans are regularly utilized in conditions where the organization is ruined.

Besides that, section 900 of a similar part, alludes to the plan of motion which has a particular use. Even though it has a practically similar methodology with the plan of course of action. Plans can be utilized in a wide scope of settings and can reach out to cover any concurrence with which the court is fulfilled. Changes in the idea of the organizations and their resources prompted the improvement of creative corporate salvage techniques, by and large known as pre-bundled deals. Pretty much every corporate bankruptcy regulation on the planet incorporates a salvage apparatus like pre-packs, the most notable being s.363 of the 11 U.S. Code[23]. In England and Wales, pre-packs for the most part happen as an organized methodology. In pre-pack organizations, the offer of the organization or its business is organized before the beginning of the bankruptcy methodology and it is affected not long after the arrangement of an executive.

Specifically, this postulation contends that the speed, absence of straightforwardness and restricted partner investment intrinsic in these cycles set out opportunities for different creditors. Specific accentuation on the changes to the organization method under the Insolvency Act 1986 that was presented by the Enterprise Act 2002[24]. The Insolvency Act 1986 unites the arrangements of the Insolvency Act 1985 and the Companies Act 1985 arrangements on chiefs’ preclusion. New guidelines under this Act were distributed in October 1986, and the Act is relied upon to be in power in December 1986.

The Building Societies Act 1986 significantly broadens the force of building social orders. In addition, the fact that their main role of fund-raising from individuals and loans to individuals on the security of private property is held[25]. Along with this, it is quite possible in terms of asking the area administrator as well as the court in terms of getting permission for bringing proceedings.

Other than that, it is likewise material if there should be an occurrence of the organization not being ready to cover bills for long terms and the all-out of its overall liabilities explicitly surpasses the specific all out worth of accessible resources. A few sorts of caution signs in regards to the indebtedness of an organization and its managerial cycle can be pictured through a reliably helpless measure of income in the monetary resources of a business[26]. Other than that, the working level of an organization in the UK at introducing a particular breaking point is going to overdraft. Alongside this, another significant issue has been set to the area of managerial cycle contingent upon tension from the loan creditors.

The encountering absence of a measure of income alongside continuous misfortunes in business activities makes numerous dangers to continue the business in a coordinated manner. Other than that, the essential functional expense in regards to the continuous premises of business structure is down and triggers the danger of steady dangers about a few lawful activities regarding neglected bills. In such a manner, the Insolvency Act 1986 is for this particular organization which is confronted with a gigantic scope of monetary and other important interrelated business issues[27]. Indebtedness is a sort of basic circumstance when the association in the UK is very unfit to reimburse its essential extraordinary monetary advance.

The primary driver of bankruptcy is because lack of foresight and the responsive system is profoundly interlinked with poor monetary administration. Moreover, there have been numerous motivations to make these negative positions including loss of business income, misfortunes in the credit region, loss of income just as the loss of capital[28]. Significant changes happened in the City of London on October 27, 1986, because of changes to The Stock Exchange Rules. Further, the Financial Services Bill rolls out significant improvements to the guideline of the speculation business. With impact from October 27, 1986, stockbrokers’ proper payments on the deal and acquisition of offers for their customers were abrogated[29]. On a similar date “single limit” was likewise annulled.

On the other hand, the bankruptcy overseer has solid power as far as doing whatever is convenient or required concerning the administration of undertakings. The job of managerial technique can be exclusively associated with the business functional method just as get the convention of property of the association through eliminating the critical chiefs and other designated chiefs.

The extremely hotly-anticipated principles and guidelines in regards to Insolvency Rules 2016 has been laid before Parliament on 2016, 25th October. In addition, it has been coming into the regulation power in 2017, sixth April. Other than that, the Insolvency Rules 1986 just as all revising regulations has been cancelled. Insolvency Act 1986 under Section 222 is showing arrangements about failure as far as paying obligations[30]. Alongside this, the standard has been applied during neglected leaders concerning £750 or more.

In this particular case, the association has halted their labour for a considerable length of time in the wake of getting the help of interest which is commonly disregarded as far as paying the total to get or accumulate. It is generally conscious for conveying administration as per the general inclination of the leaser[31]. Then again, the authoritative interaction has been only presented by the official type of the Insolvency Act 1986 as it is fundamentally changed by the type of the Enterprise Act 2002 among the UK based associations.

The Insolvency Act 1986 in regards to the construction of parliament of the UK has been offered a sort of lawful stage concerning all fundamental hierarchical issues which are connected with both corporate and individual bankruptcy in the United Kingdom[32]. The picked act has been applied to get a steady activity in regards to the troublesome construction of the association which has an extremely restricted responsibility organization just as occupied with an association inside a breathing space

The Acquired Rights Directive is no special case for the degree allowed for execution. It can differ between the Member States in one significant manner with regards to circumstances in which a utilizing organization winds up in monetary misery. Part States were given circumspection to pick whether or not to use a special case for specific indebtedness circumstances[33]. It is important to accommodate the assurance of representatives in case of a difference in business, specifically, to guarantee that their privileges are defended. On the other hand, there have been outstanding changes that have not yet been made through the legislative area by UK governance.

Conclusion

The strategy can likewise be utilized for organizations that are not indebted on a deliberate premise. Organizations are considered to exist for the sole reason for their liquidations during the strategy. The Advocate General for this situation was of the assessment that the reason for the strategy was not to the point of deciding the relevance of procured privileges arrangements. Maybe the way that the organization kept on exchanging by any stretch of the imagination, paying little mind to the explanation it keeps on exchanging. It doesn’t make any difference assuming that the organization’s monetary pain would be exacerbated by the exchange of work contracts diminishing the worth of the business being moved.

In addition, it is a sort of legitimate demonstration appropriate in the UK as far as uniting a few authorizations that are unmistakably related inside the design of authoritative bankruptcy just as likewise ending up unregistered associations. Moreover, it has been romanticized that the authorization is very connected with the power of indebtedness just as the chapter 11 of people with different establishments. It is likewise bearing on two diverse emotional issues which incorporate capability just as elements of a bankruptcy professional.

The Insolvency Act in 1986 accepted a particular target in regard to advancing specific recuperation through the presentation of two distinctive salvage methodology. One salvage strategy is covering organizations’ earlier which is typically applied to the part of formal indebtedness. One more salvage process has been applied for an organization in regards to the impacted associations which are most near the type of indebtedness. Therefore, the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 known as CIGA Act 2020 in the UK has presented a kind of new cycle just as relevant measures as far as looking for early salvage of associations. The salvage cycle is specifically situated with regards to monetary misery as a sedimentary aftereffect of pandemic impact because of Covid-19 which activities brought about a gigantic scope of financial emergencies.

3. Summary

The entire discussion can be concluded as the form of the Insolvency Act 1986 has been actively designed in terms of critically dealing with several optimal issues as a type of underutilization regarding provisions of the chosen schemes. Additionally, it is likewise helpful for a specific plan once the liquidation continuing is dynamic under the acknowledgement of the Bankruptcy Act 1974. The previously mentioned act has been explicitly settled as a choice of a more adaptable framework and activity in regard to the part of intentional courses of action.

Section 21 in regards to the overall Insolvency Act has been given as a sort of extra effect concerning sequestration of a home of a bankrupt life partner. The home has been put due to vesting of the other domain of the dissolvable life partner at first in the Master. The above conversation is unequivocally gone against as a universally useful of the Insolvency Act under the legal section code 21.

Bibliography

Akintola K, Milman D. The rise, fall and potential for a rebirth of receivership in UK corporate law. Journal of Corporate Law Studies. 2020 Jan 2;20(1):99-119.

Al Mashhour, O.F., Hamad, A.M. and Al, E.M., The Scheme of Arrangement and Reconstruction as an Efficient Corporate Rescue Mechanism: A Study Under the UK’s Companies Act 2006.

Ali R. International Insolvency Regimes and Rescue Measures Particularly with Reference to the USA and the UK. Journal of Law & Social Studies (JLSS). 2020;2(1):26-33.

Blazy, R. and Nigam, N., 2019. Corporate insolvency procedures in England: the uneasy case for liquidations. European Journal of Law and Economics, 47(1), pp.89-123.

Chen TW, Azmi R, Abdul Rahman R. Paradigm shift from a liquidation culture to a corporate rescue culture in Malaysia: A legal review. International Insolvency Review. 2020 Jun;29(2):181-203.

Edelman, J., Meehant, H. and Cheung, G., 2019. The evolution of bankruptcy and insolvency laws and the case of the deed of company arrangement. Lloyd’s maritime and commercial law quarterly, (4), pp.571-602.

Ellina S. Administration and CVA in Corporate Insolvency Law: Pursuing the optimum outcome. International Company and Commercial Law Review. 2019 Feb 1;30(3):180-91.

Frisby S. Of rights and rescue: a curious confluence?. Journal of Corporate Law Studies. 2020 Jan 2;20(1):39-72.

Gov.uk. 2017. About us. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/liquidation-and-insolvency/liquidation-and-insolvency

Hawthorn, D. and Young, M., 2018. Remodelling the model law: the model law on recognition and enforcement of insolvency-related judgments. Corp Rescue Insolv, pp.195-197.

Kastrinou, A. and Vullings, S., 2018. ‘No Evil is Without Good’: A Comparative Analysis of Pre‐pack Sales in the UK and the Netherlands. International Insolvency Review, 27(3), pp.320-339.

Keay, A., Loughrey, J., McNulty, T., Okanigbuan, F. and Stewart, A., 2020. Business judgment and director accountability: a study of case-law over time. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 20(2), pp.359-387.

Legislation.gov.uk. 1986. About us. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/45

Legislation.gov.uk. 2000. Insolvency Act 1986. Available at:   https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/45/pdfs/ukpga_19860045_en.pdf

Nsubuga HJ. Employee rights in corporate insolvency: a UK and US perspective. Routledge; 2019 Oct 8.

Onyinye OC. CORPORATE RESCUE MODELS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE UNITED STATES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH NIGERIA. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW AND LEGAL PHILOSOPHY (IJOCLLEP). 2020 Jul 13;2(3).

Parliament.uk 2019. Insolvency: company Administration. Available at: https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN04915/SN04915.pdf

Parry, R. and Gwaza, S., 2019. Is the balance of power in UK insolvencies shifting?. Nottingham Insolvency and Business Law e-Journal, 7.

Umfreville C. Pre-Packaged Administrations and Company Voluntary Arrangements: The case for a holistic approach to reform. International Company and Commercial Law Review. 2019 Oct 31;30(11):581-603.

Umfreville, C., 2019. Pre-Packaged Administrations and Company Voluntary Arrangements: The case for a holistic approach to reform. International Company and Commercial Law Review, 30(11), pp.581-603.

Vaccari E. Corporate Insolvency Reforms in England: Rescuing a “Broken Bench”? A Critical Analysis of Light Touch Administrations and New Restructuring Plans. International Company and Commercial Law Review. 2020 Oct 21;31(12):645-67.

Vaccari E. English Pre-Packaged Corporate Rescue Procedures: Is there a Case for Propping Industry Self-Regulation and Industry-Led Measures such as the Pre-Pack Pool?. International Company and Commercial Law Review. 2020 Feb 25;31(3):170-97.

Wood, J.M., 2019. Assessing the effectiveness of the UK’s insolvency regulatory framework at deterring insolvency practitioners’ opportunistic behaviour. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 19(2), pp.333-366.

Yebisi ET, Omidoyin TJ. Corporate Rescue Law to the Rescue of Businesses in Trauma in Nigeria. JL Pol’y & Globalization. 2018;73:44.

[1] Onyinye OC. Corporate Rescue Models In The United Kingdom And The United States: A Comparative Study With Nigeria. International Journal of Comparative Law and Legal Philosophy (Ijocllep). 2020 Jul 13;2(3).

[2] Yebisi ET, Omidoyin TJ. Corporate Rescue Law to the Rescue of Businesses in Trauma in Nigeria. JL Pol’y & Globalization. 2018;73:44.

[3] Ellina S. Administration and CVA in Corporate Insolvency Law: Pursuing the optimum outcome. International Company and Commercial Law Review. 2019 Feb 1;30(3):180-91.

[4]Parliament.uk 2019. Insolvency: company Administration. Available at: https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN04915/SN04915.pdf

[5] Ali R. International Insolvency Regimes and Rescue Measures Particularly with Reference to the USA and the UK. Journal of Law & Social Studies (JLSS). 2020;2(1):26-33.

[6] Chen TW, Azmi R, Abdul Rahman R. Paradigm shift from a liquidation culture to a corporate rescue culture in Malaysia: A legal review. International Insolvency Review. 2020 Jun;29(2):181-203.

[7]Legislation.gov.uk. 2000. Insolvency Act 1986. Available at:   https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/45/pdfs/ukpga_19860045_en.pdf

[8] Vaccari E. Corporate Insolvency Reforms in England: Rescuing a “Broken Bench”? A Critical Analysis of Light Touch Administrations and New Restructuring Plans. International Company and Commercial Law Review. 2020 Oct 21;31(12):645-67.

[9] Ali R. International Insolvency Regimes and Rescue Measures Particularly with Reference to the USA and the UK. Journal of Law & Social Studies (JLSS). 2020;2(1):26-33.

[10] Umfreville C. Pre-Packaged Administrations and Company Voluntary Arrangements: The case for a holistic approach to reform. International Company and Commercial Law Review. 2019 Oct 31;30(11):581-603.

[11] Gov.uk. 2017. About us. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/liquidation-and-insolvency/liquidation-and-insolvency

[12] Umfreville C. Pre-Packaged Administrations and Company Voluntary Arrangements: The case for a holistic approach to reform. International Company and Commercial Law Review. 2019 Oct 31;30(11):581-603.

[13]Legislation.gov.uk. 2000. Insolvency Act 1986. Available at:   https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/45/pdfs/ukpga_19860045_en.pdf

[14] Akintola K, Milman D. The rise, fall and potential for a rebirth of receivership in UK corporate law. Journal of Corporate Law Studies. 2020 Jan 2;20(1):99-119.

[15] Legislation.gov.uk. 1986. About us. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/45

[16] Vaccari E. English Pre-Packaged Corporate Rescue Procedures: Is there a Case for Propping Industry Self-Regulation and Industry-Led Measures such as the Pre-Pack Pool?. International Company and Commercial Law Review. 2020 Feb 25;31(3):170-97.

[17] Legislation.gov.uk. 1986. About us. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/45

[18] Nsubuga HJ. Employee rights in corporate insolvency: a UK and US perspective. Routledge; 2019 Oct 8.

[19] Frisby S. Of rights and rescue: a curious confluence?. Journal of Corporate Law Studies. 2020 Jan 2;20(1):39-72.

[20] Al Mashhour, O.F., Hamad, A.M. and Al, E.M., The Scheme of Arrangement and Reconstruction as an Efficient Corporate Rescue Mechanism: A Study under the UK’s Companies Act 2006.

[21] Ellina, S., 2019. Administration and CVA in Corporate Insolvency Law: Pursuing the optimum outcome. International Company and Commercial Law Review, 30(3), pp.180-191.

[22] Ali, R., 2020. International Insolvency Regimes and Rescue Measures Particularly with Reference to the USA and the UK. Journal of Law & Social Studies (JLSS), 2(1), pp.26-33.

[23] Umfreville, C., 2019. Pre-Packaged Administrations and Company Voluntary Arrangements: The case for a holistic approach to reform. International Company and Commercial Law Review, 30(11), pp.581-603.

[24] Akintola, K. and Milman, D., 2020. The rise, fall and potential for a rebirth of receivership in UK corporate law. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 20(1), pp.99-119.

[25] Chen, T.W., Azmi, R. and Abdul Rahman, R., 2020. Paradigm shift from a liquidation culture to a corporate rescue culture in Malaysia: A legal review. International Insolvency Review, 29(2), pp.181-203.

[26] Parry, R. and Gwaza, S., 2019. Is the balance of power in UK insolvencies shifting?. Nottingham Insolvency and Business Law e-Journal, 7.

[27] Kastrinou, A. and Vullings, S., 2018. ‘No Evil is Without Good’: A Comparative Analysis of Pre‐pack Sales in the UK and the Netherlands. International Insolvency Review, 27(3), pp.320-339.

[28] Blazy, R. and Nigam, N., 2019. Corporate insolvency procedures in England: the uneasy case for liquidations. European Journal of Law and Economics, 47(1), pp.89-123.

[29] Wood, J.M., 2019. Assessing the effectiveness of the UK’s insolvency regulatory framework at deterring insolvency practitioners’ opportunistic behaviour. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 19(2), pp.333-366.

[30] Hawthorn, D. and Young, M., 2018. Remodelling the model law: the model law on recognition and enforcement of insolvency-related judgments. Corp Rescue Insolv, pp.195-197.

[31] Keay, A., Loughrey, J., McNulty, T., Okanigbuan, F. and Stewart, A., 2020. Business judgment and director accountability: a study of case-law over time. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 20(2), pp.359-387.

[32] Edelman, J., Meehant, H. and Cheung, G., 2019. The evolution of bankruptcy and insolvency laws and the case of the deed of company arrangement. Lloyd’s maritime and commercial law quarterly, (4), pp.571-602.

[33] Hawthorn, D. and Young, M., 2018. Remodelling the model law: the model law on recognition and enforcement of insolvency-related judgments. Corp Rescue Insolv, pp.195-197.

Know more about UniqueSubmission’s other writing services:

Assignment Writing Help

Essay Writing Help

Dissertation Writing Help

Case Studies Writing Help

MYOB Perdisco Assignment Help

Presentation Assignment Help

Proofreading & Editing Help

Leave a Comment