MSc Management Personal Effectiveness Assignment Sample 2023
Introduction
Personal effectiveness is the most important parameter for a human to find the best form of oneself and this parameter considers different approaches for different skills. As an illustration, skills consider quality to meet anyone’s goal with ease. This effectiveness delivers motivation to one’s career to meet with success in life by putting hard work, strong mentality, energy and developing abilities. The basic 7 skills are determination, persistence, creativity, developing ideas, self-confidence, managing stress, problem-solving and decision-making skills.
These all put effort to overcome any issues by finding suitable solutions and provide encouragement to people to self-develop their skills. Therefore, the effectiveness in self-development will deliver support to meet their specific goals. In addition, personal effectiveness consists of four parameters such as ownership, discipline, execution and learning agility.
Personal effectiveness considers a practice of anyone’s daily life to analyse issues and to find key factors for developing strength in life and this positive approach provides a boost to bring out a clear concept for implementing development.
This report includes three tasks in which task 1 discusses key skills and behaviours of Mark Zuckerberg and this part uses various modules to deliver leadership and personal effectiveness. This task also uses one personal effectiveness framework to discuss properly skills and behaviour.
Task 2 of this report delivers an idea of learning styles and this includes Honey and Mumford’s learning styles and provides the strengths and limitations of those styles. In addition, task 3 of this report delivers developing skill methods and includes the most effective method by comparing with two methods by analysing similarities and dissimilarities between those two. This report aims to deliver effective learning methods by providing suitable examples to help one to develop a career.
Task 1 – Analyses of key skills and behavior of Mark Zuckerberg
Skill and behavior of Mark Zuckerberg
Mark Zuckerberg the man of competency created a blue-white platform and this platform keeps on modifying. This is only possible when a person is continuously upgrading his skills or continuously working for the betterment of his workplace (Caroline et al. 2021). A few skill and behavior of Mark Zuckerberg is:
Hard worker
Mark Zuckerberg uses his 100% concentration and focuses on his work. Mark Zuckerberg analyzes the market, acknowledges the need of the market, and then works continuously for change. He can work persistently for new ideas and can generate a change for his company. Undoubtedly, he has the master skill of coding and a compelling vision.
The hard work of Mark Zuckerberg made Facebook a successful social website along with its heights. Facebook is one of the oldest and the most used social media today this is only possible due to regular changes according to the users.
Ruthless
Mark Zuckerberg becomes ruthless whenever there is a need. His ruthlessness was noticed when there was a clash between the co-founder Estevez and Winklevoss twins that created a lot of hype in the media (Winch and Little, 2021). He uses his determination and ruthless behavior in removing the competitive threat of the market.
Critical thinker
Mark Zuckerberg has a clear vision though he focuses on every idea whether it is a small or a large one. He believes in deep thinking and looking at the outcomes of the idea or thought he focuses on the most profound thought that assists him about wrong and right. If Mark Zuckerberg is having a bunch of ideas he goes for the idea, which has the best outcome no matter if it, is his second choice or his third choice.
Problem solving
Mark Zuckerberg is an exceptional problem solver, while running a company worldwide there are many possibilities of having hundreds of problems each day. There is need to solve every problem and proper rules are made for each problem. He examines the ideas that he implemented. He has a strong feeling or urges to solve puzzles
Examples regarding his skills and behavior as mentioned above:
- The best example of Mark Zuckerberg’s hard work is the name of the company Facebook that is multinational.
- We all have seen the ruthlessness of MarkZuckerberg he sets an example by setting down his competitor Snapchat
- He accepts the ideas that have the proper outcome no matter if it is the second best or the third best idea.
- Before developing facebook he developed a website within an hour named Facemask.com he stole photos from nearby databases and used them for choosing two beautiful women. This website crossed the limit of traffic within two days (Rasyidi, 2022). He used this to avoid it because he hacked those photos instead of taking permission to use it.
Use and the limitation of skills and behaviors
- Hard work implies rigorous working for the company for its betterment. If a new idea strikes then work is to be done for that particular idea so that it gets implemented for the continuous progress of the company. Hard work has its limitations. It should not go in the wrong direction and it should align with smart work.
- Ruthlessness is the behavior that helps in taking tough decisions regarding the growth of the company and defeating the competitor. Ruthlessness can make a bad impression on the employees.
- Critical thinking is most important concerning the business so that companies renovate it with new ideas to make some difference. It should have certain limitations so that critical thinking does not gets diverted to over thinking.
- Problem solving continues the relevant flow of the consumers to enter the website (Niebuhr and Gonzalez, 2019). Problem solving should have a particular time limit so that it does not take time for the rest of the management system.
Analysis of skill and behavior of Mark Zuckerberg
Mark Zuckerberg has awful leadership skills, which keep Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp top on the social media list. This is due to the equanimous behavior of MarkZuckerberg. This helps him to stay cool in typical conditions or stressful situations (Zuckerberg and King Jr, 2018). He has a calm approach toward any kind of challenge because anger does not solve the problem in that particular situation; rather the situation turns out to be uncontrollable.
CMI Code of Conduct
Mark Zuckerberg has a CMI code of conduct framework that is a real differentiator. This is what the company stands for; it refers to professionalism, competence, honesty, integrity, and keeping updated concerning the market (Greer and Quick, 2022). This code binds all the members and adds ingredients to the position.
Task 2 – Evaluation of Learning Style
Learning styles measure one’s performance to rectify gaps while meeting objectives and this observation provides effectiveness to meet goals. This evaluation delivers strong objectiveness to complete a quality performance in any field such as in a professional career and business.
Figure 1: Honey and Mumford’s learning style
(Source: Health.gov.au, 2022)
This part includes Honey and Mumford’s learning style to evaluate self-learning performance. Honey and Mumford’s learning style delivers four professional learning parameters such as activists, reflectors, theorists and pragmatists (Health.gov.au, 2022). Activists’ criteria measure performance by analysing involvement to collect new experiences by removing bias. Reflectors determine learning styles by analysing data and observing learning capabilities from different angles or perspectives (Krajcik, J.S. and Czerniak, 2018).
Theorists deliver suggestions of facts after completing the analysis and this process considers theories in it while completing this process. Pragmatists practice finding new ideas and skills to have an opportunity for development.
Figure 2: Results of Honey and Mumford’s learning style test
(Source: Mint-hr.com, 2022)
After completing this test, I achieved a score of 8 in theorist, 3 in activist, 5 in pragmatist and 7 in reflector (Mint-hr.com, 2022). Therefore, the above analysis, delivers that the self-learning analysis follows different statistics, theories, stories, quotes and information before conducting any development. Globalisation theory is one of the development theories that include the process of completion of events by following the development in social, economic and cultural aspects to achieve an international benchmark in any prospects (Clark, 2019).
Therefore, effective learning theories provide support to make any decision to achieve goals. I, therefore, follow this approach while considering any implementation to make any improvement. In addition, I follow remarkable person’s activities such as Mark Zuckerberg while setting development in my career. I collected 3 scores in activists as I practised a few activities such as problem-solving and role play and therefore, I gain information from this test to perform overall activities by counting other experiences.
I achieved a 5 score in pragmatics as I practice not enough activities to find skills and this score indicates I to cover more activities in my career. In addition, I achieved 7 scores in the reflector as I follow through with different types of statistical observation while considering any data analysis activities (Cheng et al. 2018). In this part, I also want to make development by considering more surveys and analysis of data. The overall score shows that needed development is required in many aspects to achieve quality and meet goals in a career.
Professional development follows different types of learning styles and out of those two learning styles, visual learning and kinesthetic learning style are effective learning styles to make developing in a professional career. Visual learning style includes any learning objectives by providing visual guidance and this can be both offline and online versions (Onyema et al. 2019).
For example, learning of a chapter in the education sector considers providing knowledge through a blackboard discussion. Therefore, learners can collect information from theories and handmade drawings at a time and can relate to both figures and theories to gain complete knowledge. Therefore, this good understanding will provide support to develop their career as this style delivers a depth of knowledge.
Online visual learning also provides support as this process delivers learning materials in audio-visual mode by using modern technologies in it (Chernikova et al. 2020). The present generation practices this learning mode to gain more information learning through it.
These all are the strength of visual learning styles. However, this learning process has some limitations as offline learning cannot be able t provide a real example of practical knowledge for any subjects and therefore, this provides a lack in the learning process (Karabulut‐Ilgu et al. 2018). Online learning also faces technical issues and this interrupts the learning process. This learning style has not enough opportunity to clear one’s doubt while completing learning materials.
The kinesthetic learning style is another learning model and this process delivers learning by showing practical knowledge. This style follows direct touch with objects to clear learning objectives (Sousa and Rocha, 2019). For example, anyone can have information regarding Facebook on google, however, this information will not provide enough real experience. Therefore, by using Facebook, one can collect more experience and can elaborate more clear information about Facebook.
This learning style, therefore, delivers effective support in the practical learning process to build clear ideas on the learning materials (Lam et al. 2018). This style considers visual and auditory techniques and therefore has a similarity with the visual learning process.
However, this learning style has a limitation as the learning process can be interrupted if real learning materials or practical resources will not available for some learning aspects (Darling-Hammond and Cook-Harvey, 2018). Therefore, the learner will face issue while learning if the unavailability of learning resources occurs.
Task 3 – Comparison of Strategies for Improving Skills
Methods to improve the skills
The two basic methods to improve the skill are :
- i) Training
Training is one of the best ways of learning and practicing the skill as well as gaining knowledge. If the technology advances, the employees need to enhance their skills and align with the latest technology (Jaroenkitboworn, 2021). Trainings are used in different ways:
Technology-based training: If there is advancement in the technology in terms of the latest software to make the workflow easy and scalable. Technology is used to make particular tasks easy and short.
On-the-job training: It is one of the most commonly used training to focus on skills related to the job. This especially trains the newly hired and gives the knowledge of insights. It takes less time and is less expensive and employees are trained under supervision.
- ii) Job rotation
Job rotation is a practice where employees are shifted to different assignments to expose themselves in each vertical of the organization.
- Job rotation is used for learning purposes so that employees get to learn about every field.
- It leads to a flexible workforce. The workflow will enlarge, and management feels free to fill any role available.
- Employee replacement: If any of the employees leave the company, the management can allocate the vacant place to a variety of employees (Chopra and Bhilare, 2020). Here job rotation plates a major part in management.
Identification of similarities and differences in skill development methods
Training and job rotation methods are the two methods that can be used in any organisation to develop personal and professional skills. Training methods consider skill-up activities by providing learning materials to the people. This needs to be both theoretical and practical as both parts deliver different significance.
Theoretical training provides depth knowledge of any learning materials and this process discusses entire subjective parts (Almazova et al. 2020). Practical training includes the real-life experience of any learning materials and this training includes direct involvement physically in the learning materials. Therefore, these two complete packages deliver entire knowledge of any topic and support the people to complete their job role to make development in the organisation.
Whereas the job rotation method delivers different knowledge in different aspects and this process does not deliver entire details knowledge (Farashahi and Tajeddin, 2018). Therefore, people or employees need to collect more information by self-learning and this makes difference this method from training methods.
Effective method to develop skills
The above-mentioned two methods deliver effectiveness by developing people’s skills (Lacerenza et al. 2018). After analysing completely both methods, the training method can be more effective as this method provide a complete package of learning materials to people. In addition, this method completes the training process by providing suitable and needed time and therefore, people can learn depth and practical knowledge from this learning method.
Conclusion
Personal effectiveness is a success parameter to making a career by meeting goals and this follows a wide range of activities. However, not every people follow entire activities and the people who practice enough quality activities, get advantages over others. This report concludes as personal effectiveness needs self-confidence and eagerness in learning and skill development to make effective in career making process.
Therefore, this will deliver ways to meet goals and this personal development has a direct impact on professional development. This professional development helps an organisation to develop entire business activities and provide support to achieve great success in the business market. This report analyses and discusses Mark Zuckerberg and his leadership styles and approaches. This person dropped out from Harvard, after this person launched Facebook and covers great success by delivering a worldwide business.
By using this example, this study wants to deliver important information about self-confidence and leadership. In addition, this report discusses different learning styles and shows important knowledge about learning needs and learning processes. This study also includes the skill development method and shows that the training method is an important method to complete skill development activities for people in the education sector and the business sector also.
This report wants to show an effective learning process to make development in both personal and professional careers and wants to provide future scope for further development on the same topic.
Reference
Books
Krajcik, J.S. and Czerniak, C.M., 2018. Teaching science in elementary and middle school: A project-based learning approach. Routledge.
Clark, R.C., 2019. Evidence-based training methods: A guide for training professionals. American Society for Training and Development.
Journals
Caroline, R.T., Sitorus, U., Sinurat, B. and Silalahi, D.E., 2021. An Analysis on the Speech Act of Mark Zuckerberg in English Speeches YouTube Channel. Zien Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), pp.175-181.
Rasyidi, A.H., 2022. THE ANALYSIS OF FORMAL LANGUAGE STYLE USED IN MARK ZUCKERBERG’S SPEECH (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang).
Niebuhr, O. and Gonzalez, S., 2019. Do sound segments contribute to sounding charismatic? Evidence from a case study of Steve Jobs’ and Mark Zuckerberg’s vowel spaces. International Journal of Acoustics and Vibration, 24(2), pp.343-355.
Zuckerberg, M. and King Jr, M.L., 2018. An Exercise in Leadership: Being the Change that You Wish to See. Powerful Relationships in Leadership: A Collection of Modern Leadership Insights, p.57.
Winch, A. and Little, B., 2021. Mediating American hospitality: Mark Zuckerberg’s challenge to Donald Trump?. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(6), pp.1243-1260.
Greer, K. and Quick, J., 2022. 7 best practices for implementing a successful mental well-being strategy. Employee Benefit News.
Onyema, E.M., Ogechukwu, U. and Anthonia, E.C.D., 2019. Potentials of mobile technologies in enhancing the effectiveness of inquiry-based learning approach. International Journal of Education (IJE), 2(01), pp.1-22.
Karabulut‐Ilgu, A., Jaramillo Cherrez, N. and Jahren, C.T., 2018. A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), pp.398-411.
Sousa, M.J. and Rocha, Á., 2019. Leadership styles and skills developed through game-based learning. Journal of Business Research, 94, pp.360-366.
Lam, Y.W., Hew, K.F. and Chiu, K.F., 2018. Improving argumentative writing: Effects of a blended learning approach and gamification. Language learning & technology, 22(1), pp.97-118.
Almazova, N., Krylova, E., Rubtsova, A. and Odinokaya, M., 2020. Challenges and opportunities for Russian higher education amid COVID-19: Teachers’ perspective. Education Sciences, 10(12), p.368.
Jaroenkitboworn, K., 2021. Connecting Strategies in Mark Zuckerberg’s Commencement Speech at Harvard University. rEFLections, 28(3), pp.395-418.
Chopra, A. and Bhilare, P., 2020. Future of work: An empirical study to understand expectations of the millennials from organizations. Business Perspectives and Research, 8(2), pp.272-288.
Farashahi, M. and Tajeddin, M., 2018. Effectiveness of teaching methods in business education: A comparison study on the learning outcomes of lectures, case studies and simulations. The international journal of Management Education, 16(1), pp.131-142.
Lacerenza, C.N., Marlow, S.L., Tannenbaum, S.I. and Salas, E., 2018. Team development interventions: Evidence-based approaches for improving teamwork. American psychologist, 73(4), p.517.
Darling-Hammond, L. and Cook-Harvey, C.M., 2018. Educating the Whole Child: Improving School Climate to Support Student Success. Learning Policy Institute.
Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Stadler, M., Holzberger, D., Seidel, T. and Fischer, F., 2020. Simulation-based learning in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(4), pp.499-541.
Cheng, A., Nadkarni, V.M., Mancini, M.B., Hunt, E.A., Sinz, E.H., Merchant, R.M., Donoghue, A., Duff, J.P., Eppich, W., Auerbach, M. and Bigham, B.L., 2018. Resuscitation education science: educational strategies to improve outcomes from cardiac arrest: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 138(6), pp.e82-e122.
Websites
Health.gov.au, 2022. Identifying your personal learning style – Department of Health Available at: https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/publications/publishing.nsf/Content/drugtreat-pubs-front1-wk-toc~drugtreat-pubs-front1-wk-secb~drugtreat-pubs-front1-wk-secb-2~drugtreat-pubs-front1-wk-secb-2-5~drugtreat-pubs-front1-wk-secb-2-5-ide [Accessed on: 05/09/2022]
Mint-hr.com, 2022. Honey and Mumford Learning Style Questionnaire – Mint HR Available at: https://www.mint-hr.com/mumford.html [Accessed on: 05/09/2022]
Appendix
Appendix 1: Honey and Mumford’s learning style questionnaire
- I have strong beliefs about what is right and wrong, good and bad.
- I tend to solve problems using a step-by-step approach, avoiding any ‘flights of fancy’
- I regularly question people about their basic assumptions.
- I am keen on self-discipline such as watching my diet, taking regular exercise, sticking to routine.
- I take care over the interpretation of data available to me and avoid jumping to conclusions
- I like to relate my actions to general principles
- In discussions I like to get straight to the point
- I enjoy fun-loving spontaneous people.
- I am careful not to jump to conclusions too quickly.
- I prefer to have as many sources of information as possible – the more data to mull over the better
- I tend to be attracted to techniques such as new work analysis, flowcharts, contingency planning.
- Quiet, thoughtful people tend to make me feel uneasy.
- I think that decisions based on thorough analysis of all the information are sounder than those based on intuition.
- In meetings I put forward practical, realistic ideas
- I can often see better more practical ways to get things done
- I tend to discuss specific things with people rather than engaging in ‘small talk’
- If I have a report to write I tend to produce lots of drafts before settling on the final version
- I am keen to reach answers via a logical approach
- I like to be able to relate current actions to a longer term, bigger picture.
- It’s best to ‘look before you leap’
- I steer clear of subjective or ambiguous topics
